Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue Question About Denied Claim

Rate this question


smilen66

Question

Good Evening Everyone,

Many of you may know my claim was denied last week. I've settled down some and was finally able to read the entire claim decision today.

In Section 3, sc was denied for degenerative joint disease for thoraculmbar because my service treatment records show only 1 complaint of low back pain (Oct. 20, 1982).

My tour of Duty was 9-22-80 through 9-23-84

Entries in my treatment record:

  • 11-6-1980 back pain

  • 12-3-1980 Thoracic Back Pain (Taken by Ambulance to Emergency Room)Note made by Dr.: Injury 3 weeks ago with persistent pain.
  • 1-16-1981 Right Lower-Mid Thoracic Pain
  • 10-20-1982 Pain in Mid Section of Spine
  • 7-8-1983 Back Pain Inferior border of Right Scapula
  • 3-7-84 Right Thoracic back pain

My question is wouldn't the above be considered a mistake made by the rater, if there are other treatment days in my service treatment record?

Thanks for responding!

Smilen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hello Smilen66,

Sorry to hear of your denial. Is this the first decision made on your claim? I do know for a fact that as we all get older the chances of degenerative bone disease is more common. But, if your claim is for degenerative bone disease in the lower back then all the treatment you received for the Thoracic area would not be the same. The lower is the Lumbar area and if that is where your pain is then the Veteran Affairs can say that that was the only doctor visit where low back pain was mentioned. Now, the CUE. That is something I have one my claim when I had the DRO decision made and my evidence was listed as a Notice of Disagreement instead in the Evidence Used. I was told that these claim of CUE will be taken up at the Hearing you have before your BVA Appeal (Form 9). Any one word in your medical records can change a whole claim. It has to be just like your claim for compensation. Go back and look at other parts of your records where you may have had a physical for transfer, or for hazardous duty and see if there is anything mentioned about pain in the lumbar or lower back.

Good Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Remember that a CUE is done on a final decision. If you have the ability to appeal a denial that is much easier than trying to prove a CUE. An example is a claim you filed ten years ago that was denied and never appealed. You look at your C-file one day and you discover some gross error the VA made that would change the outcome of your claim. That might be a CUE. The CUE is the last resort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smilen,

This is no where near a C&UE and even if it were

you are no where near the time to call a C&UE.

C&UE has to be on a final unappealed decision.

Berta may pop in on this thread and mention

you can ask the VA to call a C&UE themselves on a decision,

but what you have is not a C&UE.

samiam,

Welcome to Hadit. You posted,

"I was told that these claim of CUE will be taken up at the Hearing you have before your BVA Appeal (Form 9)."

A claim for C&UE can be either with the VARO,BVA or Court,

where ever it is - a specific claim for C&UE must be filed unless VA calls it on

themselves which rarely happens.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Smilen66,

Sorry to hear of your denial. Is this the first decision made on your claim? I do know for a fact that as we all get older the chances of degenerative bone disease is more common. But, if your claim is for degenerative bone disease in the lower back then all the treatment you received for the Thoracic area would not be the same. The lower is the Lumbar area and if that is where your pain is then the Veteran Affairs can say that that was the only doctor visit where low back pain was mentioned. Now, the CUE. That is something I have one my claim when I had the DRO decision made and my evidence was listed as a Notice of Disagreement instead in the Evidence Used. I was told that these claim of CUE will be taken up at the Hearing you have before your BVA Appeal (Form 9). Any one word in your medical records can change a whole claim. It has to be just like your claim for compensation. Go back and look at other parts of your records where you may have had a physical for transfer, or for hazardous duty and see if there is anything mentioned about pain in the lumbar or lower back.

Good Luck.

Hi Samiam,

Thanks for responding. Yes, this is the 1st decision made on my claim. I agree "I do know for a fact that as we all get older the chances of degenerative bone disease is more common." You are current on your research. My point of contention, (I apologize for sounding angry) is when I fell off that truck in Nov. 1980, I was 24 years old. I looked backed at the treatment given for each region and it was either heat or balm or medication depending upon the region.

My claim was for back condition. I now realize , I should have been more specific and named all parts of my back. The V.A. chose to focus on thoracic and lumbar.

Samiam stated: "Now, the CUE. That is something I have one my claim when I had the DRO decision made and my evidence was listed as a Notice of Disagreement instead in the Evidence Used." Please expound...I really don't understand.

As for transfers, I only went Alabama to Georgia and nothing is mentioned about pain in my transfer.

Thanks for being genuine, knowledgeable and compassionate in your response!

Smilen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that a CUE is done on a final decision. If you have the ability to appeal a denial that is much easier than trying to prove a CUE. An example is a claim you filed ten years ago that was denied and never appealed. You look at your C-file one day and you discover some gross error the VA made that would change the outcome of your claim. That might be a CUE. The CUE is the last resort.

Okay, I understand. I appreciate you spelling it out to me...that's what I need. Thanks also, for the example! It has already been suggested that I do a NOD and get a IMO...both of which I'm working on. I have an appointment with my medical Dr. on Wednesday and I'm hoping she can refer me to an Orthopedic Dr. I read somewhere on hadit.com it is better to get an IMO from a Dr. that specializes in what you are claiming. Thanks for your patience!

Smilen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

smilen,

This is no where near a C&UE and even if it were

you are no where near the time to call a C&UE.

C&UE has to be on a final unappealed decision.

Berta may pop in on this thread and mention

you can ask the VA to call a C&UE themselves on a decision,

but what you have is not a C&UE.

samiam,

Welcome to Hadit. You posted,

"I was told that these claim of CUE will be taken up at the Hearing you have before your BVA Appeal (Form 9)."

A claim for C&UE can be either with the VARO,BVA or Court,

where ever it is - a specific claim for C&UE must be filed unless VA calls it on

themselves which rarely happens.

jmho,

carlie

Thanks Carlie! I've learned something this evening! I think I was grasping at straws because I didn't understand why my claim would be denied.It seemed everyone was soooo quiet but I now know it has been said.... NOD and IMO. Thanks again!

Smilen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use