Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Pre-service Disability Reduction

Rate this question


Vync

Question

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

After reading a bunch of forums here, I decided to re-read my original SC award letter. I found that the VA actually reduced a 30% rating by 10% because they say I had a 10% pre-service disability. I would like to know if it would be worth the effort to 'correct' this problem.

I am 40% SC, but here is the breakdown of my SC conditions:

1. 10% asthma bronchiole (claimed as asthma)

2. 30% allergic rhinitis/sinusitis (reduced by 10% because the VA says I had a 10% pre-service disability)

3. 10% chronic allergic conjunctivitis, bilateral

4. 10% internal derangement of the right temporomandibular joint

Pre-service disability?

On my award letter, for number two it says, "Prior to service, the disability is considered 10 percent disabling, based on evidence that showed he always had problems of recurrent rhinitis. Following military discharge, the disability is 30 percent disabling which is the maximum evaluation for allergic rhinitis, because evidence now shows septal deviation and nasal polyps not shown on the veteran's entrance examination. The preservice percentage is always deducted before assigning any service-connected evaluation less than 100 percent. This condition is evaluated as 20 percent disabling."

Here is where it gets wierd. On my award letter, for number one it says, "In the doctor's opinion, the veteran obviously had allergic problems before entering the service which got worse during service implied by development of asthma in 1991."

Questions:

1. If I had both conditions prior to service, how could they determine a percentage of a pre-service disability percentage without examining me?

2. Can I get this 10% reduction corrected?

3. What do I do now?

Thanks in advance!

V

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Vync

I assume the statement "In the doctor's opinion, the veteran obviously had allergic problems before entering the service which got worse during service implied by development of asthma in 1991." is from the C&P exam? Also you said "If I had both conditions..."; did you? What does you induction physical say--anything regarding chronic allergic rhinitus or asthma prior to service? Did you make any statments to the effect of having either or both conditions?

Finally, how long ago was this original claim decided? If it is less than a year, the you can file a NOD. After a year, you are going to need to either reopen the claim with "new and material evidence" or file a CUE (harder still).

Can you get the 10% reduction removed? Yes, but only if the condition(s) did not exist prior to service. Which means that your induction physical and early SMRs would have to be silent regarding rhinitus and asthma, and (obviously) you had not been diagnosed with either condition by your physician prior to entry onto AD. Which means you are going to have to successfully dispute the examiner's statement that you "obviously had allergic problems before...". It would help if you had your complete C-File, including the examiner's report. I know my VARO is about a year behind filling records requests, it would be much faster to make an appointment and go to the VARO in person to review your C-File.

Good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The fact that you had allergies and they got worse when you served is not a valid reason to reduce your service connected rating.

Welcome to Hadit.

Anything that gets worse in service is the same as a brand new condition. The word they use is aggravated

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA uses this scenario. Aggravation of a preservice disability will be service conected only to the extent of the aggravation.

That is the hurdle you ,ust jump.

J

A Veteran is a person who served this country. Treat them with respect.

A Disabled Veteran is a person who served this country and bears the scars of that service regardless of when or where they served.

Treat them with the upmost respect. I do. Rejection is not a sign of failure. Failure is not an option, Medical opinions and evidence wins claims. Trust in others is a virtue but you take the T out of Trust and you are left with Rust so be wise about who you are dealing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

That's good info from everyone.

I think I had indicated that I had the problems when I went on AD, but will have to dig through and check, but I never indicated the extent. I find it crazy that the VA puts you through the meatgrinder and they have strict guidelines to qualify someone for a percentage, but they can magically generate a "reduction" number out of thin air without any strict measurements.

Also, visiting the RO to view my records sounds like a good idea. I am going to call them and see about making an appointment to to that.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use