Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

To Anyone Who Had A Claim Decision Made In The 1970's

Rate this question


hurryupnwait

Question

To anyone who had a claim decision made in the 1970's, I would thoroughly review the decision. It seems that many people on this board had decisions made in the 1970's that had potential errors, (including myself, for not sending me a final decision on a claim).

Happy Trails

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

John,

Mine out of St Pete didn't either in 1978.

It only said if my conditions re-cur I could submit the evidence.

carlie

Carlie

The VA has to properly notify you.

I also found this in my files.

CLAIM STILL OPEN IF PROPER NOTICE OF DECISION NOT SENT TO VETERAN

§ A veteran’s claim was denied in 1969. The VA avers that a notice of decision was not sent to the veteran. In 1982, the veteran sought to reopen his claim. A September 1982 RO decision found the claim had been previously denied. The VA sent a letter only advising the veteran that his claim had previously been denied in 1969. The veteran did not appeal the decision. In 1998 the veteran, through counsel, indicated that he had never been notified of the 1969 denial and requested a formal decision on that claim. The VA’s 1998 response acknowledged failure to notify the veteran of the 1969 decision but found that the 1982 letter informing the veteran that his 1969 claim had been denied finalized the issue and that his appeal rights had expired.

In 1998 the veteran appealed to the Board. The Board denied the veteran’s claim concluding that the back condition had been denied in 1969, that the September 1982 RO decision confirmed and continued the 1969 decision denying the claim and that the notice of the 1982 decision notified the veteran of his continued denial of service connection and included appellate rights information.

On appeal, the Court found the 1982 notice inadequate because it did not provide a reason for the denial in 1969 as required at 38 C.F.R. § 3.103. Ruffin v. Principi, 16 Vet.App. 12, 15 (2002).

Paul

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hmmmm.....if the VA had a duty to inform you of your appeal rights and did not do that is that a CUE? I am not basing my CUE on that issue, but I wonder. My decision does not even say I a have the right to any sort of review or increase if my problems get worse. It is a bare bones couple of pages as far as what is in my C-File. I know in a lot of governmental legal claims and cases if you are not informed of appeal rights they may throw out the decision. I don't know if that is the case with VA claims. I did not get a C&P exam, but that is probably no big deal. My rating was based entirely on my SMR's and in-patient hospital records at the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm.....if the VA had a duty to inform you of your appeal rights and did not do that is that a CUE? I am not basing my CUE on that issue, but I wonder. My decision does not even say I a have the right to any sort of review or increase if my problems get worse. It is a bare bones couple of pages as far as what is in my C-File. I know in a lot of governmental legal claims and cases if you are not informed of appeal rights they may throw out the decision. I don't know if that is the case with VA claims. I did not get a C&P exam, but that is probably no big deal. My rating was based entirely on my SMR's and in-patient hospital records at the VA.

It may not be a CUE because you never received a proper notice of a decision.

It might be considered an open claim.

CLAIM STILL OPEN IF PROPER NOTICE OF DECISION NOT SENT TO VETERAN.

Maybe ask your attorney about it. My attorney avoided calling it a CUE and is saying that it is an open claim, but in my claim, I had a c&P exam and then no decision was ever sent to me, this was noted in my BVA remand letter. The BVA went thru my C file and decided to make note that I never received a decision letter. I owe a great deal to the BVA lawyer that wrote that into my remand letter or I would have never remembered it.

Paul

Edited by hurryupnwait

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
It may not be a CUE because you never received a proper notice of a decision.

It might be considered an open claim.

CLAIM STILL OPEN IF PROPER NOTICE OF DECISION NOT SENT TO VETERAN.

Maybe ask your attorney about it. My attorney avoided calling it a CUE and is saying that it is an open claim, but in my claim, I had a c&P exam and then no decision was ever sent to me, this was noted in my BVA remand letter. The BVA went thru my C file and decided to make note that I never received a decision letter. I owe a great deal to the BVA lawyer that wrote that into my remand letter or I would have never remembered it.

Paul

Paul, Were any of your unfavorable decisions on effective date made in or after 1980 and did any of these claims involve the issue of unemployability? I ask this because beginning in a particular date in 1980 V.A. began using a circular on unemployability which was basically illegal because no public comment had been made under law. The case that decided that recently at the Federal Circuit was Andrew Collaro v. Togo West and it is posted below under a link with that name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul, Were any of your unfavorable decisions on effective date made in or after 1980 and did any of these claims involve the issue of unemployability? I ask this because beginning in a particular date in 1980 V.A. began using a circular on unemployability which was basically illegal because no public comment had been made under law. The case that decided that recently at the Federal Circuit was Andrew Collaro v. Togo West and it is posted below under a link with that name.

DelataJ

I did n't find the link.

I found the case. Thanks for the info

Paul

Edited by hurryupnwait

When I count my blessings I count my family and friends twice.

If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there.

Well done is better than well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use