Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Reopening A Claim Or Filing For Secondary.

Rate this question


10thFO

Question

Last year I was diagnosed with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. I am now going to reopen my originally denied claim for "neck Strain". Should I apply for the "neck strain" which would be a reopen, or file for radiculopathy in relation to Degenerative Disc Disease and Herniation which would be a new claim. Also is there a way to also word the claim to be rated secondary as an injury from a SC injury. Last summer I fell out of my attic, when I was getting some luggage down to go on vacation. Wife wasn't home, and I flipped one and a half times landing on the threshold to the stairs across my lower back, and my neck breaking 3 steps off of an aluminum folding stairs set. I've still got the scar on my right shoulder where it took a 2" wide by 6" long gash out of my skin. It was a very nasty fall and my fingers and hands started hurting worse immediately after that.

I had a Dr. recently look at my MRI's which were taken one month before the fall, and he said that the c-spine injury was related to the lumbar as to the age of the arthritis showing up on both MRI's. I guess I should see about having another one now to see if the fall worsened the conditions. But I'd like to see if I can apply for both the original claim, and the secondary to already SC injury, because if the original gets denied again, I'd have the claim in for Secondary as well, in essence getting the same % and money.

The fall was caused by a numb foot that I couldn't feel trip over the lip to the stairs. causing the flip out of the attack. I still don't know how i didn't kill myself. Very scary.

80% SC/100% TDIU

70%PTSD All the rest is Back problems.

10th Mountain.

God Bless the Troops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

10thFO

Is the numb foot service-connected? You need to build your claims the way you lay bricks. One row of bricks on top of another. If the foot is SC and it was the cause of your consequential injury then maybe you have a claim, but you need a doctor to say that in definite terms. What you will be trying to prove is that your numb foot failed you and as a consequence you took a fall and got other injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Appreciate that John. In referencing the MRI I had in may of '05 I'm thinking that with a Dr.'s written statement that said injury to Cervical Spine, happened at the same time as my DDD in lumbar spine as attested to by the aging of the arthritis as it shows on the cervical and lumbar MRI's and x-rays, are of the same aging. He told me that there is no way that the cervical spine happened at a later date. This would be my basis for Reopening my claim with new and material evidence correct? I'm just asking to make sure before I get him to write the letter. He already said he would.

80% SC/100% TDIU

70%PTSD All the rest is Back problems.

10th Mountain.

God Bless the Troops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your foot or feet are not S/C on their own then the numb foot would have to have been caused from your DDD of your lumbar degeneration or maybe if a nerve were involved from your lumbar DDD and it caused you to lose your balance....Only an injury caused by a S/C condition can be secondary...That is my take on it anyhow.

Railroader

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use