Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Congressman Filner

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Congressman Filner , Chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee-will be joining us during the second half of the show- and we will be discussing with him the situation of homeless veterans- and what is being done to help them.

http://www.stardustradio.com/

5:30 CT and 6:30- EST

Our call in number is 1-319-648-5143

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks all-Mcafee-that was the exact number Congressman Filner gave out-(202)225 2346

I didn't see your question here until this AM-so I assume that was you calling in to the show?

Did he say this was Malcolm Shorter's number?

He gave the same number to another call in too-

I hope the new number helps you-

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all-Mcafee-that was the exact number Congressman Filner gave out-(202)225 2346

I didn't see your question here until this AM-so I assume that was you calling in to the show?

Did he say this was Malcolm Shorter's number?

He gave the same number to another call in too-

I hope the new number helps you-

I tried to interrupt the Congressman when he said claims were taking 6 months to a year- This is a fallacy that the VA perpetuates.

The reality is it takes about 4 months for the VA to send the claimant a VCAA letter - these letters can be so deficient that the VA knows the letter will set up a BVA remand down the road-the main reason for the backlog-

and then the denial letter might come 2-3 months later within 6 months to a year.This statistic in no way reflects that claims are being worked on and resolved within a year.

They arent.

In my correspondence to Congressman Filner on other issues I have been quick to point out that the backlog has been caused by the ROs themselves due to deficient VCAA letters to the claimant.

A proper VCAA letter incorporates Pelegrini and Hupp (for widows claims)-they actually have to read the claim to be able to develop a proper VCAA letter.

Then it is up to the claimant to get to them what they need.

Deficient VCAA letters almost always cause the BVA to remand so that the veteran can get their VCAA rights at the RO level.WIth ample evidence however, the BVA can award. They did this in my case although every statement and submission I made to BVA (it was the first statement in my I-9) pointed out (with copy as evidence ) how deficient my VCAA letter had been.

I mentally made up my own VCAA letter and sent them what it should have said.BVA found thr RP deficiencies were moot because they had the evidence that a proper VCAA letter would have asked for.

I could gripe all day about this- and really get ticked when I hear the 6 months to a year claims process.All one needs to do is look at the original claim dates of current BVA cases.

With more troops being sent into Afganistan and with the passage of the AO Equity Act (hopefully) as well as the 3 new AO presumptives, more claims will continue to be filed.

Someone asked in the readio show chat room if more judges will be hired at the BVA, they have 4 new ones now- unfortunately I dont think that important question got asked on the air-but COngressman Filner said the magic word ---Accountability-----

if we get that from the VA (and it sure has been lacking)- that alone could significantly alter the claims process.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I tried to interrupt the Congressman when he said claims were taking 6 months to a year- This is a fallacy that the VA perpetuates.

I sometimes think that the members of congress are beguiled by those they are suppose to oversee.... You did a great job, Berta. I enjoyed putting a voice to the wit & wisdom I read from your posts. You are one in a million.

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello All Hope All Is Well.

Thank You Berta,Yes I did call in I was so nervous I broke down cause at the same time I am angry for what the US.Army and Veterans Administration has taken a life and future from a man whom only wanted to serve his country and in return to be neglected by those whom created the SOLDIER.

For some odd reason the same problem still exists due to network difficulties your call can not go through? Did not contact Col.Shorter

I also did not hear Congressman Filner address spoliation of record?

That was a great show and Keep it going.Thank You Again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello All Hope All Is Well.

Well my phone company informs me that Washington DC.has BLOCKED any incoming calls from my or this telephone number.

They also said this is very unusual and are looking further into as to why?

As for me personally I am not surprised by anything Washington does or has to offer cause to DATE they have not been productive as for Veterans entitlement or resolve.

I am curious as to whom threw the switch or was this in error.I am sure Congressman Filner would like to know that now in order not to deal with a Veteran just BLOCK his or her Number. Imagine WOW.!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use