Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Spoliation Destroying Or Removing Evidence In A Claim

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

Just want to know is there a deadline to file a claim for spoliation? I have several claims on remand from 1994 to 2004. Is there a guild line to writing a response?

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

http://www.vawatchdog.org/VAshredderscandal.htm

There is a deadline this month as well as criteria for dates of submissions that are claimed lost or destroyed, and the above link has the Fast letter and direction as to how to file these claims under the October Incident.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Thanks

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Pete992

Late last year, Dr. Peake wrote "fast letter 08-41" regarding the subject. Since all you will get from the VA's website about the shredder scandal is pretty much lip service where they promised not to do it any more, and gave amnesty to employees who violated the law and shredded evidence. Your best source of information on the shredder scandal is VA watchdog...Larry Scott has kept a close eye on it and is much more credible than the VA..the VA is trying to save several executives neck on this deal, and many of us would like to "attend the hanging" of VA executives nailed for shredding evidence. It appears that the VA has gotten their way, again, at the cost to Veterans. Not only were VA executives NOT prosecuted for this shamefull illegal destruction of evidence, at least one, at the Cleveland RO was actually promoted, instead of being jailed.

http://www.vawatchdog.org/08/nf08/nfdec08/nf120408-1.htm

Other shredder scandal information is here:

http://www.vawatchdog.org/VAshredderscandal.htm

My recommendation: If you feel that you are a shreddergate victim (many are victims and dont even know it...there were no letters sent to possible victims), then file

a "Special Handling Request" (SHR). You can file it on a 21-4138, if you like. I recommend you include your reasons why you think certain evidence was shredded, such as RO Decisions which do NOT reflect certain evidence.

It is a good idea to send copies of evidence you feel has been shredded, if you have copies. If you dont, file a SHR anyway, and explain that even tho this evidence is missing, it is confirmed by medical evidence, etc. etc, and recall the shredded documents contents as best as you can.

File all this at your RO and send it certified mail return receipt requested BEFORE NOV. 19.

If you do not get a response, then complain to the VAOIG.

Keeping copies of everything, if the RO "blows off" your SHR, like they did mine, then include this information when you appeal. Nail em..dont let em off the hook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Sample SHR letter:

Jones, Robert..123-45-6789

RE: Special Handling request due to critical evidence being shredded.

The above named Veteran humbly requests the RO give attention to this "Special Handling Request" per Dr. Peak's fast letter 08-41, because it appears that evidence critiical to the Veterans case has been shredded or mishandled by the RO as follows:

1. On Sept. 1, 2001 the Vetran applied for benefits due to a broken back suffered during military service. Since this condition was not listed in any of the decisions since then, this critical evidence appears to have been mishandled. A copy of this application is enclosed.

2. The Veteran supplied an IME by Dr. Bosch on July 1, 2001 which was not listed as evidence in the December, 2004 RO decision so it also appears to have been shredded.

3. A copy of the claims file received by the Veteran on Oct. 1, 2009 is missing several key pieces of evidence, and the VEtran is enclosing this missing evidence.

4. One document, an application for dependents, is missing, and the original is also missing. However, the Veteran filed this evidence on Sept. 1, 2001 along with his application listing Robert Jones Jr. age 3 on the document, and Mrs. Sally Jones as spouse. Since the Veteran is not being paid for dependents it is assumed this evidence was also shredded. The regulations require the VA to consider that the VEteran is seeking the maximum benefit allowable by law, and there is simply no evidence that this Veteran was not seeking benefits for his spouse and dependent children also.

I certify that the above information is true to the best of my knowledge.

Signed, Robert Jones, Veteran dated 11/01/2009

Robert Jones name was used, and is not my real name. My apologies to anyone who may also have that same name.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Thanks

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The special procedures cover missing documents submitted by a veteran or other applicant for VA benefits during the 18-month period between April 14, 2007 and October 14, 2008.

VA will process any missing applications or evidence resubmitted under these special procedures as if the document had been originally submitted on the date identified by the claimant.

Veterans and other applicants have one year, or until November 17, 2009, to file previously submitted documents under these special procedures.

Veterans not covered by these special rules who believe relevant material is missing from their files can submit additional documentation at any time. An award of benefits earlier than April 14, 2007, may be established if there is credible corroborating evidence supporting an earlier date of document submission."

It pays to repeat this info as to Special Handling Procedures for claims coming under the "October Incident."

We have until Nov 17,2009 to take advantage of the VA Fast Letter on this.

I realized that -as I keep getting SSOCs for a CUE claim -that VA failed to m,ention any of my legal evidence which was certainly sent between the April 2007 and Oct 2008 time frame.

I am preparing this letter tomorrow-

I dont know however if anyone has had a claim under the October Incident properly adjudicated upon recipt of the evidence or recipt of the Special request under the VA Fast letter -October 2008

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use