Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Evidence Of A Prolonged Period Without Medical Complaint

Rate this question


Domepeace

Question

I've seen and read cases that are denied because of:

"Evidence of a prolonged period without medical complaint and the amount of time that elapsed since military service, can be considered as evidence against a claim."

I would like to know any thoughts on how to combat this. I'm not sure if stating that a veteran cannot afford health insurance is a viable answer. I'm curious to know, what would be considered a prolonged period; one year, five years?

Thanks,

Domepeace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

There are a number of reasons for a gap in records. I have had a history of back problems. In the 80s I went the rounds of chiropractors. Unfortunately, the two I saw have expunged their records. Ergo, "no record of complaint." I did get a number of letters from people I knew, neighbors, family, that could attest to my back troubles. Weak, often discounted, but they're sometimes better than nothing.

I too have not sought health care when needed because I had no insurance and cannot afford it. It happens.

Another reason to not have a record of care, and I did cite this, is employer bias. Back problems in particular can get expensive. If you establish a pattern of back problems, you can suddenly find yourself in an unemployment line- but not for your health problems! Never that!! But you came to work late one day, made an error in your job... anything will do. My last company was notorious for it. If your back went out or you other wise hurt yourself on the job, you had best not report it! You either "got the flu" or had to take a week off for a "death in the family," things like that. I was having problems keeping my footing and walking any distance (I worked in a large plant) and took to using a stick to get around. I was quietly warned that could get me ousted. Then I fell a couple of times and even though I didn't report any injury I was written up. During a work slow down, I was one of those laid off. But that didn't help either because the reason given was strictly "economical."

In that time period I had one treatment record for my knee and none for my back. I used to just call my doctor and he would prescribe a muscle relaxer. I guess he didn't keep records of those things very long because they weren't in my records from him.

So very nearly the only thing I can offer are 'buddy letters."

It makes for hard going. :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Go back and try to re-visit some of the doctors who treated you. Hopefully, they will not have retired yet and might still remember you, especially if they treated you for an extended duration. It may be possible for them to write a statement indicating they treated you and their diagnosis. It's better than nothing.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is going to depend on the type of disease or injury you are talking about. I have read many BVA cases where the BVA has said, " Medical care is not a requirement to prove service connection".

Now for example, ( and not to get graphic) just before I retired from service in 1986 I started having problems using the toilet.. I went home on terminal leave and before I know it every time I used the toilet I was cleaning blood off my rear. It got so bad that it hurt when I walked. I finally made a 90 minute trip to Fort Devens to get medical treatment at 5 in the evening. I learned that I had a small hemorrhiod. With that knowledge I felt better, at least it wasn't serious enought for me to worry about, it hurt like hell, and was literally a pain in the a$$ , but it was not going to kill me. The problem would come and go for years.. and I never really thought about it much. Later much later I had a colonscopy done and the hemorrhoid was mentioned in the report. Later still I was reviewing my medical records to find evidence of sinusits, when I came across the first entry of treatment for this hemorrhoid. I realized then that I had a valid claim of benefits, but I was not sure I could prove it since I was not treated for it over the years..after all once you know how to take care of this problem you just learn to live with it.. I decided what the heck, and put the claim in. I was granted 10% in 2004. Now that means that was 18 years after I retired, and the only medical evidence I had was that first treatment when I was on terminal leave, and colonscopy reports over the years. I didn't have any doctor statement indicating a NEXUS, I really had nothing.

So too make a long story short you do not always have to prove treatment.. You just have to prove when the problem started and that you still have a problem.

Oh.. I have a few other problems that I had very little medical evidence for. And I also received service connection for those problems too.

Edited by Teac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

Hey Teac,

I am also SC for sinusitis, but was granted based on a five year appeal right after I got out.

An issue like DDD is a bit different. I posted a link to a BVA case where a guy got SC for DDD 20 years after having a single back injury, despite having any real concrete medical evidence at all. I have a lot of evidence, then a gap, then a whole lot more evidence. The VA acknowledges I have DDD, but simply say it is not SC. It basically is a crap shoot sometimes and the appeal continues.

Also, Berta indicated that there was medical evidence a mile long in her claim, but the VA simply did not bother to read it.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use