Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

From Personality Disorder To Adjustment Disorder

Rate this question


blanco63

Question

I was honorably discharged from the navy in october, 1983 for personality disorder of mixed schizoid and schizotypal features. in november, 1983 i filed a claim for mental disorder. in may, 1985 i had my c & p exam and was diagnosed with adjustment disorder but they said it was non-compensable which was true. was i service connected at that time? in 2000, i reopened my claim and was told the same thing, you have adjustment disorder which is non-compensable. well, as of 11-7-96 it had become compensable. should the va had given me a percentage in 2000? did they make an error and would this be a reason to file a cue claim? if so, what is the best way to do one? do you fill out a certain form and send it to a certain person at the varo? i will be very grateful for any advice and opinions on this matter. thank you!

sarcastic cane toad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

to berta and fellow veterans - in 1985 i was not rated 0% sc nor 0% nsc. i can understand that as adjustment disorder was not payable at that time but was later. i just believe that service ocnnection was established in 1985 as they discharged me for personality do and then said i had adj do at the c and p. i will now give you more details. it is taken directly word for word from the paperwork i have. 10/17/83 hon discharged from the navy for mixed personality disorder, schizoid and schizotypal features. 11/30/83 i opened claim for mental disorder. 5/30/85 c and p exam diagnosed with adjustment disorder. 10/21/85 denied for mental disorder as mental deficiencies and personality disorders are not considered disabilities. veteran is diagnosed with personality and subsequent adjustment disorder is not a disability which is compensable. was i not service connected for adj do at that time without a percentage? 5/23/00 i reopened the claim and sent va my records from my doctor showing treatment for depression from 1996 - 2000 with zoloft. va answer - new and mat evidence has not been submitted(what were those 4 years of records). claim for mental cond denied 10/21/85. smr's showed personality do. va exam 5/30/85 showed adjustment do. neither of these are disabilities for which compensation is payable. well adj do(9440) had become payable as of 11/7/96 so why wasn't i given a percentage in 2000? what do you think about this? what do you think i should do? i will appreciate your help. thanks, john

sarcastic cane toad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume you now receive VA comp for adjustment disorder.

You could file a CUE claim.

CUE claims are hard to succeed in -you have to be peristent and fully support the CUE.

Be specific in it-

you made a good point as to the diagnostic code or lack of one :

"neither of these are disabilities for which compensation is payable. well adj do(9440) had become payable as of 11/7/96 so why wasn't i given a perc...."

Go to the CUE forum -there is plenty of info there and CUE claims can succeed.It is difficult but possible.

what actually is your 50% for now?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi berta, thanks for the quick response. right now i receive 50% for migraine headaches and just started two secondary claims for chronic pain syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome. i am going to try to finish them before starting the cue claim. i think that is the route i must take because i have been denied 4 more times in the last 2 years for any mental condition everytime i got an increase for migraines. i even sent new evidence every time esp when i went for the 50% in may. at that time, my doctor even wrote a letter and stated that my bipolar disorder, social anxiety disorder, and chronic adjustment disorder were incurred in the navy and are related and connected to the personality disorder that i was diagnosed with in the navy. well, still got a denial on that and the letter was not even listed in the list of evidence. denial, ha ha? shouldn't i be getting increases, right? was i not already service connected for a mental disorder in 1985 and 2000? well, that's my story. i will appreciate all advice and opinions. thank you!

sarcastic cane toad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

blanco 63

I have seen adjustment disorder service connnected as secondary to migrane headaches. You might need to pursue this in your claim otherwise the rest of this post deals with what I have read so far.

I am interpreting the decision you quoted differently than you are. It merely states that personality disorders and adjustment disorders are not service connectable. It is not clear that the C&P examiner stated that the adjustment disorder was the result of military service. It could easily be that they are saying that you have a personality disorder related to military service and adjustment disorder of which could have onset after service. Adjustment disorders can onset at any time of your life.

was i not service connected for adj do at that time without a percentage? You need to read the decision carefully. Does this decision specifically state that you are service connected at 0% for an adjustment disorder. Or are you just interpreting this. The decision would probably say something to the effect that service connection for adjustment disorder is granted.

You state that adjustment disorders became service connectable in 1997.I have not seen any recent cases where adjustment disorder was allowed unless it was secondary to another chronic service connected condition. I emphasize the word chronic. The primary condition must be chronic in order to service connect adjustment disorder as a secondary condition. The reason adjustment disorder is only awarded as secondary to another chronic condition is because adjustment disorder is not considered a chronic condition in and of itself. The DSM-IV specifically states that the symptoms of adjustment disorder cannot last more than six months. If the symptoms last more than six months then they need to apply another diagnosis. I will post some BVA decisions later today to show you how this is applied.

It will not be easy to determine that you should have been given compensation at an earlier date. This is because of diagnostic criteria may have changed. In the 80s you were diagnosed under the DSM III. At the time the law changed In 1997 the DSM –IV was in effect. The fact that the diagnostic criteria changed could confuse the issues of an earlier effective date. You can file a CUE claim at any time in the future. Considering that you're dealing with a diagnosis from the DSM and the DSM went through changes it would be premature to say that you have a CUE claim. It will require more investigation.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The military likes to use adjustment disorder instead of PTSD. This is because adjustment disorder is less permanent and less severe. Why not post your decision so we can read the exact wording.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Citation Nr: 0902082

Citation Nr: 0917013

By a May 2006 Supplemental Statement of the Case, the RO

increased the disability rating for a service connected

adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features as

secondary to a service connected back disability, from 10

percent to 30 percent, effective September 12, 2005; the date

of referral to a mental health clinic for increased

depressive symptoms.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use