Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tinnitis Comp Exam

Rate this question


OnRiver

Question

Went in for Comp Exam for Tennitis....said I had it bilaterially and conceded Vietnam Combat noise....was in Tanks....but said in his proffesssional opinion was not related to my service. My Va State Rep went blastic after reading. Guy isn't a Dr. so does anyone have any experience with this type of opinion giving and its effect on compensation ruling. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest terrysturgis

ONRIVER, I am SC Tinnitis 10% bilaterial. I have tried to help two Viet Nam veterans get their Tinnitus service connected and they got turned down. I think my claim succeded because I had an IMO from a licensed audiologist that said my tinnitus was " as likely as not to be service connented" before I filed a claim and took the C&P. I was artillery and sent a tape recording I made in country to support my claim. I am 0% SC for hearing loss. I had the other two veterans NOD and get the IMO to try again. One was 11B infantry and the other was an Army small aircraft repairman. Also just for info I am DMII 20%, lower body 20% each leg bilaterial, 10% each arm upper body, billaterial with 10% tinnitus for a total of 70%. As Berta says file for everything, Good Luck! Terry Sturgis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also Onriver-

This is a long lawsuit from the District Court regarding a disability-(maybe SSA case?)

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:fiTCo5...k&cd=1&ie=UTF-8

The condition dysenthesias (like you mentioned you have) is mentioned in it and also how it restricted the plaintiff from work as well as other conditions he had-

I feel this could be the basis in your case for SMC- (38 USC 1114) due to loss of use of hand, directly due to the DMII.

In this federal suit the description of 'loss of use of hand is quite similiar to the VA's-

it could also be used in support of a claim for TDIU if in your dominant hand.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what is so strange...he states that it is likely as not service related and then states his medical opinion is that it is not because its not always there basically. I contacted another audio guy stated that tinnitius to be military connected must be continous. But he did say that by saying it is likely as not would give me a 50% chance. The State Va guys are scratching their heads. They said they would appeal if it came back denied. Has anyone heard that tennitus has to be constant to get it? I mean if having your head against a 90 mm going off (tank gunnery)isn't trauma then what is?

Thanks for all your help it is much appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same C & P examiner pooh-poohed my tinnitus claim twice before I apparently got lucky and the right VARO person picked up my case.

VARO disagreed with her because my files showed that I didn't claim tinnitus on entrance exams in 75 and 76, but complained of it during exams for my hearing loss in late 77 and every time I was asked since.

This finally had the very fine result of my family and I spending some retro money since last turkey day!

I often feel like I'd die willingly for a few seconds of actual silence in my head there at the end!

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use