Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Sueing A Vso

Rate this question


carlie

Question

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Ask Berta she nailed the DAV

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"nailed" is a good word-

Pete- I learned the right way to do it-too----

If a service officer causes you damages ( a complete loss of a monetary award) directly due to their negligence-you can sue them in a state court.

Fortunately - even claims that have lousy POAs can succeed eventually- and there are no damages to be recovered.

I suggest that you write to the National Headquarters and to the Commander or Exec board of the vet org regarding any SO who has been negligent -

State clearly why you feel this SO has caused you detriment-

give them some facts that are documented.

Like- say a SO says he will file an appeal (or NOD)for a vet- the vet finds out the appeal (or NOD)was never filed within the year appeal time.

The vet can re-open but he/she has lost the EED.

The SOs defense however could be that the ultimate responsibility for these filings fall on the vet- good point- or simply say he was 'new' vet rep, or poorly trained or just plain stupid.Dont know how the vets chances would be on that case to succeed in state court-

I feel a vet should NEVER depend on an SO to do ANYTHING!

Then again- say a SO (I had similiar case) tells a widow claimant -the claim died with the veteran-and they fail to say that the widow can resurrect the claim-the widow does not know any better and has no reason, based on this SOs statement , to pursue a claim and then years later she finds she was eligible for DIC and also accrued benefits.

The SOs advise (if she can prove what he told her-like his appt book etc resulting in meeting with no claim filed) has cost this widow money.

She files for DIC and accrued 5 years later, after getting a better vet rep and is awarded these benefits-however-since she did not file within one year after the vets death- due to the SOs statement, she has lost forever 5 years of DIC-but

she has basis for damages in a law suit.

Best bet is to go to the SOs boss and complain- with facts-in a letter first. Then if financial damages have actually occurred and cannot be recovered via better representation and the evidence warrants the benefits,

then that is basis for a law suit.

I filed in federal court-dont do that-use the state court-

I had no damages as my awards came after the suit was filed-

still I had taken a deposition of the SO and it was dynamite-

and I enjoyed the look on the faces of him and his lawyer when I whipped out my settlement with the US of A-I had three awards from the VA with me and he said three years before that , that I had no basis for probative claims at all-

I argued his point (thinking this is what any NSO would say)and re-opened but his attitude continued to be very negative and he had no faith at all in what my evidence rvealed.

Complain at the highest level first and give specific facts-as to how the SO is hindering your ability to succeed.

Carlie- I only know of a few vet reps locally-after 20 years of this- who are really good and also up on all of the latest regs etc.

It is really up to us and not up to them to succeed.

The vet rep POA I have in the VARO building is excellent-when into conference with them twice for me when they screwed up---he felt I had succeeded in Sept with more than enough evidence- but still it is solely the medical evidence that will win my claim-and not his expertise.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use