Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

How Do You Un-join This Hadit Board?

Rate this question


LarryJ

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Somebody?

Please?

Help Me.

I can't find the EXIT door.

The ESCAPE hatch.

Carlie, T-Bird, Berta, Pete............SOMEBODY get me the heck outta here!

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Sorry, you have a lifetime membership. 'til death do us part. :)

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't have to leave Larry. I will.

Free

Somebody?

Please?

Help Me.

I can't find the EXIT door.

The ESCAPE hatch.

Carlie, T-Bird, Berta, Pete............SOMEBODY get me the heck outta here!

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tis the season to be jolly :) . Lets agree to disagree and use the knowledge we have to help those in need of our services. My Christmas wishis Peace on Earth, Good will toward men. Help me out.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharon I read the posts where this occurance arose, but LarryJ gave factual information regarding SSDI. We all want peace too but people need to read the information throughly and not try to shoot the messenger. I am sure you as well as I and others have found posts we don't agree with the content someone writes, but one must look at the facts...sometimes we all may be quick to judge but the facts remain and are valid regarding eligibility for SSDI 100% benefits. Thanks Sharon for trying to mediate here too. You offer priceless info on your post responses.

quote name='sharon' date='Dec 20 2009, 10:32 PM' post='181571']

Tis the season to be jolly :) . Lets agree to disagree and use the knowledge we have to help those in need of our services. My Christmas wishis Peace on Earth, Good will toward men. Help me out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sharon I read the posts where this occurance arose, but LarryJ gave factual information regarding SSDI. We all want peace too but people need to read the information throughly and not try to shoot the messenger. I am sure you as well as I and others have found posts we don't agree with the content someone writes, but one must look at the facts...sometimes we all may be quick to judge but the facts remain and are valid regarding eligibility for SSDI 100% benefits. Thanks Sharon for trying to mediate here too. You offer priceless info on your post responses.

quote name='sharon' date='Dec 20 2009, 10:32 PM' post='181571']

Tis the season to be jolly :) . Lets agree to disagree and use the knowledge we have to help those in need of our services. My Christmas wishis Peace on Earth, Good will toward men. Help me out.

Halos,

I was not attempting to shoot any messenger for delivering any factual message. I do agree that Larry is right, that generally a person has to be not working to be approved for SSD. However, I respectfully disagree with the idea that most members present that it is impossible to get SSD while working.

You will not get SSD while working full-time. You will not get SSD while engaging in SGA. You will not get SSD if Social Security determines you are [bold]capable[/bold] of engaging in SGA, regardless of whether you are doing so.

However, there are certain circumstances where people are awarded SSD, while still working, if their disability is such that though they are still able to work some, they are no longer able to work enough to earn the Substantial Gainful amount. This can sometimes be the case in progressive conditions. The person begins to work less and less, and often eventually becomes unable to work at all.

I read in a Social Security forum (SSA Connect) that people often lose a significant amount of benefits because they list their date of onset of disability as the day they stopped working, rather when their income dropped below substantial gainful employment.

When my husband first applied for SSD, he was initially told by the intake worker that his period of disability would start December 2005 (the point he quit working). We asked her to check and see if they could consider the period from July 2005 – November 2005 also, because at that point his earnings had dropped below the substantial gainful amount, though he was still working. They approved his disability effective July 2005 – and so December 2005 became the first month he could be paid benefits, rather than the first month of his 5 month waiting period.

So one thing that really stood out to me was the fact that the Original Poster indicated he was finding it harder and harder to keep working.. That indicated to me he may well go through that period where he keeps trying to work, but finds himself earning less and less. I would recommend that if this becomes the case, that he does speak with Social Security, and / or an attorney to find out his options.

He does need to be fully informed on this matter, and not just go by what someone told him somewhere, because they have all kind of rules about what constitutes SGA (Substantial Gainful Activity) and what constitutes TWP (Trial Work Period). The threshold for TWP is lower – and a month can count as a month used in a Trial Work Period, even if the person did not earn enough to constitute SGA.

With that being said – my real issue was not that the poster was being told that in order to qualify for SSD he had to be completely unable to work at all. That seems to be the general consensus of the group. And that is also the general rule in most cases.

My real issue was that I believed the poster was in all sincerity asking a legitimate question. He had been told he could work while waiting to be approved for SSD, and he wanted to know if that was true.

If I were gobbling pain pills and putting myself through significant pain to try to keep working to support my family, I would most likely ask the same question – if I had been given the same information the poster had been given by his neighbor.

Is that true? If Social Security sees how much pain I am in and how much it is killing me to try to keep my family fed, will they find me disabled so I won’t have to keep going through this?

Unfortunately, we do know the answer is no. We do know that they will not say, “Yes. You are disabled – so you don’t have to work anymore. You can quit now.” (It would be nice if it did work that way though, in some cases.)

But I still thought the poster had a sincere, honest, legitimate question. As such, I pointed this out in response to the eye rolling post.

At this point, I wish I had not done so. Because it did not result in more respect for the poster. It resulted in his question actually being called stupid, and Larry wanting to leave the board.

I do not want Larry to leave the board on my account. If my actions caused Larry to want to leave the board, then I would prefer to be the one to leave. And I have stated such. Well… I didn’t actually state it – but did tell Larry that he doesn’t have to leave; that I will.

Larry contributes a lot to this board. I contribute from time to time, but am not consistent in doing so.

I am not leaving in anger. Though I do leave in sadness. But if I have only been back on the board for a few days, and have already created turmoil in a thread, caused a fellow member’s post to be called stupid, and made another fellow member want to quit the board – then maybe I am not ready to be back here yet.

Maybe in time I will be ready.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use