Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secondary Issues

Rate this question


shillnav

Question

I have a 10% SC injury on the left knee. A C&P was done last week on the left knee only. Am awaiting the results of a request for increase.

1. Because of the left knee injury which occured 30 yrs ago, my right knee is giving me problems due to favoring it all these yrs. Doctors early on told me this would most likely occur.

2. After the injury to my left knee, I had a numbness, tingling, pressure type sensation down my leg and into my foot. I told the VA drs about this decades ago but it wasn't severe and nothing was ever done about it. Main thing was treating the knee. This foot is now in bad shape, arthritis has set in, etc.

Question : I know this will not be a quick or easy thing, but how should I move forward on connecting the foot and my other knee as secondary conditions caused by my original injury??

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks Much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I have a 10% SC injury on the left knee. A C&P was done last week on the left knee only. Am awaiting the results of a request for increase.

1. Because of the left knee injury which occured 30 yrs ago, my right knee is giving me problems due to favoring it all these yrs. Doctors early on told me this would most likely occur.

2. After the injury to my left knee, I had a numbness, tingling, pressure type sensation down my leg and into my foot. I told the VA drs about this decades ago but it wasn't severe and nothing was ever done about it. Main thing was treating the knee. This foot is now in bad shape, arthritis has set in, etc.

Question : I know this will not be a quick or easy thing, but how should I move forward on connecting the foot and my other knee as secondary conditions caused by my original injury??

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks Much

That certainly is a distinct possibility. What does your treating physician say about your left foot and other knee? The first thing you might want to do is pick up a copy of the C&P report and see what it says. You don't have to wait to get your decision from the RO. You should be able to get a copy of the C&P report from the facility where you had the C&P.

If you get a copy of it yourself, then you will know what the doctor actually said. (Sometimes it loses a bit in the translation).

My husband had a claim for cervical problems when he retired. The claim was denied because they said they could not find a current disability, though they did find a slight problem at one of the areas. He was given another C&P on his appeals. The same area on the x-rays was noted - with an increase in the gap in the disk space - but still no finding of disability.

Later, he had a claim for his headaches. He went to a C&P exam, and the claim was denied. The RO denied it because it was not an "undiagnosed illness." Their profound statement was "Your headaches have been diagnosed as headaches." LOL

What they FAILED to tell him was that the C&P examiner had actually attributed his headaches to the service. He stated the headaches originating in the back of his head were from the cervical area. He included copies of xrays, and drew arrows to the area of the injury (the EXACT same area they had noted before) which showed it had become MUCH worse since he originally filed a claim for the cervical strain (when they couldn't find a "current" disability). The examiner also indicated his headaches that started in the front were the result of his chronic sinusitis. The examiner pointed out that this had been diagnosed in service, confirmed by xrays in the service, and treated in the service.

Yet the RO merely informed him that his claim for headaches was denied because they had been diagnosed as headaches and thus were not an undiagnosed illness.

So always, always, always get copies of the doctor's reports and read them.

Free

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a 10% SC injury on the left knee. A C&P was done last week on the left knee only. Am awaiting the results of a request for increase.

1. Because of the left knee injury which occured 30 yrs ago, my right knee is giving me problems due to favoring it all these yrs. Doctors early on told me this would most likely occur.

2. After the injury to my left knee, I had a numbness, tingling, pressure type sensation down my leg and into my foot. I told the VA drs about this decades ago but it wasn't severe and nothing was ever done about it. Main thing was treating the knee. This foot is now in bad shape, arthritis has set in, etc.

Question : I know this will not be a quick or easy thing, but how should I move forward on connecting the foot and my other knee as secondary conditions caused by my original injury??

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks Much

shill,

Welcome to Hadit.

You will need a doctor to state #1 and #2 in writing.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Since it has been 30 years since the original injury I would want a really detailed explanation from the doctor to make the secondary connection. The VA will probably come back with the fact that these are just ordinary results of aging, blah, blah. The doctor should explain the mechanics of your injury and how it has affected your gait etc to cause these secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use