Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Was I 0% Service Connected In 1986 For Adjustment Disorder?

Rate this question


blanco63

Question

I was discharged in 1983 for personality disorder and opened a claim that year for psychiatric disorder. The 2/28/86 decision states the following - Decision: Entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric condition is not warranted. Reason For Decision: Veteran is diagnosed with personality and subsequent adjustment disorder is not a disability which is compensable under the law as outlined by the 1945 Schedule for Rating Disabilities. In the beginning of this decision, it said number of sc disab - 0. I reopened claim on 5/23/00. Their 6/30/00 letter states - The claim for sc for a mental condition was rated 2/28/86. SMR's showed a personality disorder. VA exam in 5/85 showed an adjustment disorder. Neither of these are disabilities for which compensation is payable. So, was i rated 0% in 1986? If not, why wasn't i rated 0% or more in 2000 because adjustment dis had become payable in november 1996? What could i do now? Ask the VA, where's my rating or how about an increase more than my 0%? Cue time? No, it wasn't an error. Would it be called unintentional forgetfulness?

sarcastic cane toad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

At the end of your rating decision - does it show NSC adjustment disorder or something similar? (NSC is Non Service Connected - but is diagnosed in medical records). If you were rated 0% for anything in 1986 the decision would state that. Do you have a service officer? think they can print out a current list of sc and nsc ratings.

Best to ya,

Cg'up!

I was discharged in 1983 for personality disorder and opened a claim that year for psychiatric disorder. The 2/28/86 decision states the following - Decision: Entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric condition is not warranted. Reason For Decision: Veteran is diagnosed with personality and subsequent adjustment disorder is not a disability which is compensable under the law as outlined by the 1945 Schedule for Rating Disabilities. In the beginning of this decision, it said number of sc disab - 0. I reopened claim on 5/23/00. Their 6/30/00 letter states - The claim for sc for a mental condition was rated 2/28/86. SMR's showed a personality disorder. VA exam in 5/85 showed an adjustment disorder. Neither of these are disabilities for which compensation is payable. So, was i rated 0% in 1986? If not, why wasn't i rated 0% or more in 2000 because adjustment dis had become payable in november 1996? What could i do now? Ask the VA, where's my rating or how about an increase more than my 0%? Cue time? No, it wasn't an error. Would it be called unintentional forgetfulness?
Edited by cowgirl

For my children, my God sent husband and my Hadit family of veterans, I carry on.

God Bless A m e r i c a, Her Veterans and their Families!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I was discharged in 1983 for personality disorder and opened a claim that year for psychiatric disorder. The 2/28/86 decision states the following - Decision: Entitlement to service connection for a psychiatric condition is not warranted. Reason For Decision: Veteran is diagnosed with personality and subsequent adjustment disorder is not a disability which is compensable under the law as outlined by the 1945 Schedule for Rating Disabilities. In the beginning of this decision, it said number of sc disab - 0. I reopened claim on 5/23/00. Their 6/30/00 letter states - The claim for sc for a mental condition was rated 2/28/86. SMR's showed a personality disorder. VA exam in 5/85 showed an adjustment disorder. Neither of these are disabilities for which compensation is payable. So, was i rated 0% in 1986? If not, why wasn't i rated 0% or more in 2000 because adjustment dis had become payable in november 1996? What could i do now? Ask the VA, where's my rating or how about an increase more than my 0%? Cue time? No, it wasn't an error. Would it be called unintentional forgetfulness?

"In the beginning of this decision, it said number of sc disab - 0."

It said "number of service-connected disabilities - 0" as in "you had zero service-connected disabilities", as in "none".

You never had a 0% rating. You never had a service-connected rating at all, the way I read your post.

Maybe I am missing something, if so, please help me out.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Blanco

I agree with you in that there is some crazy stuff going on here.

There is a big difference between service connection denied and service connected at 0% even tho they pay the same amount..zip...zilch, nada.

If your are service connected at zero percent, you can always ask for an increase if your condition worsens. However, if SC is denied, then an "increase" does not apply.

Your one year appeal period of the 1986 has long since expired, so you will have to "CUE" the claim in order to get RETROACTIVE BENEFITS to 1986.

If you reopened your claim in 2000 due to 'new and material evidence' then you need to state what that evidence was. For example, if you saw a doctor prior to year 2000 who stated in his medical report that you had a psychiatric disorder, that is far different than a 'personality disorder'. Usually, docs dont say 'psychiatric disorder', they say you are depressed, bipolar, schizophrenic, etc...all of those are 'psychiatric disorders'.

Are you on, or have you ever been on antidepressant meds? (Zoloft, Wellbutrin, Lithium, etc). If you are/have been on those meds, the doc wont prescribe them unless he has made a diagnosis, usually for a mental disorder. The doctor is not trying to "treat" your personality..that is who you are. If you have never been on any doctor perscribed drugs, I would say you are unlikely to get any benefits for a mental disorder (unless maybe you had electro shock therapy, and they dont usually do that until they have tried pills first).

However, if you have been on antidepressants or other mental disorder meds, or have been hospitalized (mental hospital) with things like "suicidal ideations", then you are much more likely to be awarded benefits.

To get benefits, you have to have a current condition or disability, as well as a link (nexus) to military service.

I think I have heard before of Vets who were discharged with a "personality disorder" rather than a mental illness in order to not have to pay benefits. To fix this, you would need ANOTHER Doctor (VA or not VA) to state in his medical report 1)that you do have a mental condition, such as depression and 2)that it was "at least as likely as not" due to military service.

If a Doc Did state this in his medical report, I think that would be "new and material evidence" to open your case.

Finally, of course, you should review your medical records both in service and out of service. If a doc did prescribe pills for you, or if he did diagnose you with MDD or another mental disorder, then you can "CUE" them...that they failed to consider Doctor.....(Jones) evidence. The VA is required to consider ALL evidence, so if they failed to consider a doctors report then that is a basis for CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Like I said, from what you've told us, you were never service-connected for anything from the "git-go"...........so, you've never been actually "rated" at anything.....0% or otherwise.

Best bet.

File a new claim, with new evidence and citing the change of heart of the VA vis a vis personality/adjustment/psychiatric disorder(s).

IMHO.

"It is cold and we have no blankets.

The little children are freezing to death.

My people, some of them, have run away to the hills, and have no blankets, no food; no one knows where they are-perhaps freezing to death.

I want to have time to look for my children and see how many of them I can find.

Maybe I shall find them among the dead.

Hear me, my chiefs! I am tired; my heart is sick and sad.

From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more forever."

Chief Joseph

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always thought that the VA did not give me a percentage in 1986 for adjustment disorder because at that time it was not payable but believe that they should have when i reopened in 2000 since it had become payable in 1996. I guess that i've been thinking that the adjustment disorder was something called NCSC, non-compensable service connected until it became compensable in 2000. So it is time to forget that claim, stop all this nonsense, and open a new claim. I have been treated and on medication for several mental disorders since 1996. I am pretty sure that my psychiatrist will write the simple letter to get the ball rolling. My patient's bipolar do was incurred during his military service in the US Navy. It is related and connected to the schizoid personality do diagnosed by the Navy. GAF, meds, military records were reviewed. I see him on feb 1st. Thank you everybody!

sarcastic cane toad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My patient's bipolar do was incurred during his military service in the US Navy. It is related and connected to the schizoid personality do diagnosed by the Navy. GAF, meds, military records were reviewed. I see him on feb 1st. Thank you everybody!

blanco.

Are you saying you have copies of an actual DX of

schizoid personality while on active duty in the Navy?

Was that your reason for discharge?

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use