Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nexus From Neurosurgen

Rate this question


81150 CAFB

Question

I received a nexus letter from my neurosurgen today in the mail. He is very nice and the first surgery I had with this group was with a different doctor who said he does not do disabilty and how should he know if they are related(1989 surgery and his surgery in august 2009) and would not even think of writing a nexus for me. So happens my next surgery, about three months later (all at L4-L5), was with this other doctor who is younger and the only one in their neurosurgical group that does fusions. I am very thankful for this letter.

Please let me know what you think. Keep in mind I might not get him to change much. I feel he has done so much for me. Please look at the big picture as a nexus and let me know if you think it will fly.

81150 Carswell AFB

"To whom it may concern:

Mr. Hurt Back is a 40 year old gentlemen and patient of mine who recently underwent a redo L4-5 laminotimy, medial facetectomy, and foraminotomy with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. He asked me to personally review his miltary service records in regards to his history of back and leg pain, as well as mutiple surgeries at the L4-5 level.

When reviewing his military service medical records, I noted he had a right-sided L4-5 laminotimy and diskectomy performed in November of 1989 during his military service. This was done for right sided sciatic nerve pain. The patient did well after surgery but re-herniated his disk in 2009. He then underwent a redo left L4-5 laminotimy and diskectomy performed by one of my partners, Dr. Grouch, in August of 2009. The patient initially did well after after this surgery, though he developed new back pain and left leg sciatic nerve pain later in the year.

He then underwent CT myleogram, which showed a left posterolateral disk herniation effacing the left L5 nerve root and causing severe degenerative disk disease at the L4-5 level. This resulted in left leg sciatic pain and low back pain. He then subsequently underwent the previously mentioned decompression and fusion at the L4-5 level.

Based on my experience, it is likely that his mutiple problems at L4-5 are related to his initial injury and surgery in the late 1980's. This led to progression of his degenerative disk at this level, ultimately for him to have spinal fusion. I am hopeful that now with spinal fusion and decompression of both sides, he will have good long-term success, but he will never be completely pain free.

It has been my pleasure to take care of Mr. Hurt back and please call me with questions.

Sincerely,

Neurosurgen"

I know he didn't use more likely then not etc... but do you think his connection is solid? My other concern is sciatica that I still have that is probably permanent-can I claim it even though he doesn't diagnose in this letter?

All help/comments are appreciated.

Thanks!

I miss the Cold War.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • In Memoriam

Here is a BVA search that is for "At least as likely as not" in the claim. There are 15,475 claims that have this statement in them in the year 2009.

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/va_searc...0&UA=Search

This is all I will say about this issue.

Stretch

Just readin the mail

 

Excerpt from the 'Declaration of Independence'

 

We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear your struggles. I don't think the phrase "with all medical probability" is decisive enough. This phrase is too general in nature. Many things can be presumed probable in the medical field and this is why they require the doctors opinion.

We are talking about "likely" "as likely as not" "more likely than not" etc.....

All I know is what I was taught on Hadit. Three of my claims said at 'least as likely as not'. These three were rated 100, 20, 10 SMC.

One of the best ENT surgeons in the country wrote "With all medical probability" after reviewing all medical and service medical records that the injury was related to military service. This was an ENT that operated on my nose and throat, removing my tonsils, right after injuries in service, and this surgeon knew that the Dentist and he were a team, put together, to fix my service injuries. This claim has been denied four times even with several IMO and IME from original doctors. It is still on appeal for over 30 years.

Do what you like. I am just talking about my own experience. I am not just speculating.

Edited by jerrbilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I guess that's why they call it practicing medicine

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder
I guess that's why they call it practicing medicine

doctors and lawyers all have the word "practice" in their windows and we are all their guinea pigs each and everyone of us they get paid regardless of what happens to us

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please let me know what you think. Keep in mind I might not get him to change much. I feel he has done so much for me. Please look at the big picture as a nexus and let me know if you think it will fly.

81150 Carswell AFB

"To whom it may concern:

When reviewing his military service medical records, I noted he had a right-sided L4-5 laminotimy and diskectomy performed in November of 1989 during his military service. This was done for right sided sciatic nerve pain. The patient did well after surgery but re-herniated his disk in 2009. He then underwent a redo left L4-5 laminotimy and diskectomy performed by one of my partners, Dr. Grouch, in August of 2009. The patient initially did well after after this surgery, though he developed new back pain and left leg sciatic nerve pain later in the year.

He then underwent CT myleogram, which showed a left posterolateral disk herniation effacing the left L5 nerve root and causing severe degenerative disk disease at the L4-5 level. This resulted in left leg sciatic pain and low back pain. He then subsequently underwent the previously mentioned decompression and fusion at the L4-5 level.

Based on my experience, it is likely that his mutiple problems at L4-5 are related to his initial injury and surgery in the late 1980's. This led to progression of his degenerative disk at this level, ultimately for him to have spinal fusion. I am hopeful that now with spinal fusion and decompression of both sides, he will have good long-term success, but he will never be completely pain free.

It has been my pleasure to take care of Mr. Hurt back and please call me with questions.

Sincerely,

Neurosurgen"

I know he didn't use more likely then not etc... but do you think his connection is solid? My other concern is sciatica that I still have that is probably permanent-can I claim it even though he doesn't diagnose in this letter?

All help/comments are appreciated.

Thanks!

81150,

I think the letter is good for getting your problem SC'd

but I have no speculation as to what percentage level.

Something that jumps out at me is where the doc states,

"When reviewing his military service medical records, I noted he had a right-sided L4-5 laminotimy and diskectomy performed in November of 1989 during his military service. This was done for right sided sciatic nerve pain.

The patient did well after surgery but re-herniated his disk in 2009."

Being that you were separated in 1991, I have no idea how this

will play out with a VBA decision maker.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carly, I think this was mainly just a "nexus" letter. I'm sure CAFB has medical notes that will determine the rating percentage.

81150,

I think the letter is good for getting your problem SC'd

but I have no speculation as to what percentage level.

Something that jumps out at me is where the doc states,

"When reviewing his military service medical records, I noted he had a right-sided L4-5 laminotimy and diskectomy performed in November of 1989 during his military service. This was done for right sided sciatic nerve pain.

The patient did well after surgery but re-herniated his disk in 2009."

Being that you were separated in 1991, I have no idea how this

will play out with a VBA decision maker.

jmho,

carlie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use