Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ftca Claim Against The Va For Malpractice?

Rate this question


bigvic

Question

Is a ftca claim against the VA for malpractice the same as an 1151?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

No- I explained a little about it under the other post-

FTCA- is a claim against the United States of America.

That is who you settle with(under the auspices of VA General Counsel).

Those claims are handled by VA attorneys.

When a SF 95 is filed, they send you a letter asking for basically the proof of your charges.

A Section 1151 claim is filed with the VARO. It results -if one succeeds, in compensation under 1151 for the additional disabilities that the malpractice caused.

Both claims need clear and convincing medical evidence from VA medical records that megligence or malpractice has occurred.

If a vet is contemplating either or both types of claims- they should get copies of all of their VA medical records before VA is aware of their charges- because that is when stuff at the VARO can mysteriously get 'lost'.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK How do I file a FTCA claim then...? I'd like to see them try and disprove the evidence I have against the VA...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link for FTCA research.

Hope it helps you.

http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f071.htm

carlie

I am not recommending this firm just posting it for your info., hope it helps.

Also: http://www.vamalpractice.com/tort.html

The Federal Tort Claims act involves several procedures that are different than the procedures, which are used to handle a claim against an ordinary individual:

1. A proper administrative claim must be filed with the appropriate Federal Agency within two years. Although this seems simple, click here for a partial list of reported cases where this step was not completed properly and the claimant's case was dismissed. Click here for more.

2. The time for filing a complaint is governed by when the Federal Agency denies the claim. In some cases you may have to file your case as soon as six months after your accident, and in other cases you may have more than two years from the date of your accident to file your claim Although this seems simple, click here for a partial list of reported cases where this step was not completed properly and the claimant's case was dismissed. Click here for more

3. You must file your complaint in the appropriate United States District Court. Although this seems simple, click here for a partial list of reported cases where this step was not completed properly and the claimant's case was dismissed. Click here for more.

4. You must serve your complaint on the appropriate U. S. Attorney and the Attorney General of the United States. Although this seems simple, click here for a partial list of reported cases where this step was not completed properly and the claimant's case was dismissed. Click here for more.

5. The Federal Government is not an insurance company. A Federal Tort claim can only be made if the Federal employee was acting in the "scope of his employment". In some cases, the Federal Government will not be responsible for the actions of its employee and you may have to file a complaint against the individual in the appropriate court. Sometimes the statute of limitations against the individual employee, maybe different than the statute of limitations against the Federal Government.

6. You are not entitled to a jury trial. Your claim will be decided by a United States District Court Judge, without a jury.

7. The maximum attorney's fee is 20% for cases that are settled before suit is instituted and 25% for cases that are put into suit. (28 USC §2678)

Edited by carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They dont make it simple do they...

Bigvic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bigvic,

They like to make it difficult !

carlie

[Code of Federal Regulations]

[Title 38, Volume 1]

[Revised as of July 1, 2004]

From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access

[CITE: 38CFR14.600]

[Page 544-545]

TITLE 38--PENSIONS, BONUSES, AND VETERANS' RELIEF

CHAPTER I--DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

PART 14_LEGAL SERVICES, GENERAL COUNSEL, AND MISCELLANEOUS CLAIMS--Table of

Contents

Sec. 14.600 Federal Tort Claims Act--general.

(a) Federal Tort Claims Act--overview. The Federal Tort Claims Act

(28 U.S.C. 1291, 1346, 1402, 2401, 2402, 2411, 2412, and 2671 through

2680) prescribes a uniform procedure for handling of claims against the

United States, for money only, on account of damage to or loss of

property, or on account of personal injury or death, caused by the

negligent or wrongful act or omission of a Government employee while

acting within the scope of his or her office or employment, under

circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be

liable in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission

occurred.

(B) Applicable regulations. The regulations issued by the Department

of Justice at 28 CFR part 14 are applicable to claims asserted under the

Federal Tort Claims Act, including such claims that are filed with VA.

The regulations in Sec. Sec. 14.600 through 14.605 of this part

supplement the regulations at 28 CFR part 14.

© Delegations of authority concerning claims. Subject to the

limitations in 28 CFR 14.6©, (d), and (e), authority to consider,

ascertain, adjust, determine, compromise, and settle claims asserted

under the Federal Tort Claims Act (including the authority to execute an

appropriate voucher and other necessary instruments in connection

therewith) is delegated as follows:

(1) To the Under Secretary for Health, the Deputy Under Secretary

for Health, Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) Directors, and VA

Medical Facility Directors; with respect to any claim for $2,500 or less

that arises out of the operations of the Veterans Health Administration.

(2) To the General Counsel, Deputy General Counsel, and Assistant

General Counsel (Professional Staff Group I) with respect to any claim;

provided that any award, compromise, or settlement in excess of $200,000

shall be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney

General or his or her designee.

(3) To the Regional Counsels and Deputy Assistant General Counsel

[[Page 545]]

(Professional Staff Group I) with respect to any claim; provided that:

(i) Any award, compromise, or settlement in excess of $100,000 but

not more than $200,000 shall be effected only with the prior written

approval of the General Counsel, Deputy General Counsel, or Assistant

General Counsel (Professional Staff Group I); and

(ii) Any award, compromise, or settlement in excess of $200,000

shall be effected only with the prior written approval of the General

Counsel, Deputy General Counsel, or Assistant General Counsel

(Professional Staff Group I) and with the prior written approval of the

Attorney General or his or her designee.

(d) Delegations of authority to reconsider final denial of a claim.

Subject to the limitations in 28 CFR 14.6©, (d), and (e), authority

under 28 CFR 14.9 to reconsider final denials of claims under the

Federal Tort Claims Act is delegated as follows:

(1) To the Regional Counsel with jurisdiction over the geographic

area where the occurrence complained of arose, with respect to any claim

for $2,500 or less that arises out of the operations of the Veterans

Health Administration.

(2) To the General Counsel, Deputy General Counsel, and Assistant

General Counsel (Professional Staff Group I) with respect to any claim;

provided that any award, compromise, or settlement in excess of $200,000

shall be effected only with the prior written approval of the Attorney

General or his or her designee.

Note (1) to paragraph ©(2): For any award, compromise, or

settlement in excess of $100,000 but not more than $200,000 a memorandum

fully explaining the basis for the action taken shall be sent to the

Department of Justice.

Note (2) to paragraph ©(3)(i): For any award, compromise, or

settlement under paragraph ©(3)(i) of this section a memorandum fully

explaining the basis for the action taken shall be sent to the

Department of Justice.

Note (3) to paragraph (d)(2): For any award, compromise, or

settlement in excess of $100,000 but not more than $200,000 a memorandum

fully explaining the basis for the action taken shall be sent to the

Department of Justice.

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 1291, 1346, 1402, 2401, 2402, 2411, 2412, 2671-

2680; 38 U.S.C. 512, 515; 28 CFR part 14, appendix to part 14)

[64 FR 47112, Aug. 30, 1999]

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use