Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tbi Claim Sent To San Juan To Be Rated

Rate this question


prietosky

Question

My claim for tbi was sent to VARO of Puerto Rico to be rated,any veteran has the experience to been rated for TBI at Puerto Rico regional office? asked becouse i herad there is really hard to get service connected due to the way they work cases.here is some of the findings of my neurosphycological test report: SEVERE visual impairmnet,SEVERE memory,concentration,attention,SEVERE motor cordination,SEVERE ability to learn new material.

DIAGNOSTIC IMPRESSION:

Axis I 293.9 Mental Disorder due to TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (with post concissive symtoms)

309.81 Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Axis II V62.89 Borderline Intellectual Functioning

Axis III

Axis IV Problems related to readjusment from the war

Axis V 65

Based on the information above,what rating % should i get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"Based on the information above,what rating % should i get?"

If this assessment said you are unemployable due to the TBI and PTSD and they are attributed directly to your service - then they should award TDIU in my opinion but see below *- have you formally applied for TDIU yet?

How did this cover anything as to a statement on your ability to be employed?

Do you receive SSA disability benefits for these same conditions?

*If VA rates you at 70% then they will surely consider you for TDIU and send you the TDIU form-but have you sent it in to them yourself?

The rating will hinge on how these disabilities affect your ability to work.

VA uses the date of the signed and filled out TDIU form -if they award- for when the 100% rate of comp begins to be paid.

It pays to send them the form yourself- why wait?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For PTSD you could get 10,20,30,40,50% depend of the severity.TBI the same ,I get 10% for TBI inPUERTO RICO and 30 % for PTSD.

lucena,

Welcome to Hadit.

I'm sorry but the percentage levels you posted for PTSD are not correct.

The correct disability percentage levels for PTSD and all mental health disabilities are:

SC'd at zero - 10 percent - 30 percent - 50 percent - 70 percent or 100 percent.

If you were rated for a disability due to brain injury prior to Oct 2008 the criteria back then limited

that disability to 10 percent.

A change in the Schedule for TBI Diagnostic Code 8045, was made effective Oct 2008 that is much more

advantageous for the veteran.

You may request to be re-evaluated under the newer criteria.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Axis 5 of 65 is your GAF score. That score does not even come close to describing "borderline intellectual functioning" due to PTSD and TBI. A GAF of 65 means you have moderate impairment. Someone with PTSD and TBI is probably severely impaired if their intellectual functioning is boderline. This to me is typical of C&P exams. Get your own doctor who you pay to examine you and write a report. I think you should get 100% based on that exam, but the GAF does not line up with the exam description of Severe impairments listed. Does anyone else believe this vet's GAF lines up with the wording of this exam? It is as if the exam doctor has thrown a booby trap into the exam. How can anyone work with a Severe learning impairment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use