Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Available Records?

Rate this question


JimBinOK

Question

In researching VA proceedures for C&P Examinations, I have seen several places that the C&P Doctors are "required by law" to have in their posession and have reviewed the "C file" records prior to doing the examination, so they will have knowledge of the whole picture.

Can anyone tell me where I can find the specific law information to cite a possible violation by the RO?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

That is a good question-I have never seen this as an actual law for the doctors-however

within 38 CFR Book B is:

§3.303 Principles relating to service connection.

(a) General. Service connection connotes many factors but basically it means that the facts, shown by evidence, establish that a particular injury or disease resulting in disability was incurred coincident with service in the Armed Forces, or if preexisting such service, was aggravated therein. This may be accomplished by affirmatively showing inception or aggravation during service or through the application of statutory presumptions. Each disabling condition shown by a veteran’s service records, or for which he seeks a service connection must be considered on the basis of the places, types and circumstances of his service as shown by service records, the official history of each organization in which he served, his medical records and all pertinent medical and lay evidence. Determinations as to service connection will be based on review of the entire evidence of record, with due consideration to the policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs to administer the law under a broad and liberal interpretation consistent with the facts in each individual case.

This is the key partin that regulation:

"Each disabling condition shown by a veteran’s service records, or for which he seeks a service connection must be considered on the basis of the places, types and circumstances of his service as shown by service records, the official history of each organization in which he served, his medical records and all pertinent medical and lay evidence"

This decision might help:

http://www.va.gov/vetapp94/files2/9413266.txt

It contains this BVA statement:

"During a VA examination in

September 1991, the examiner indicated that it was his opinion that

the subarachnoid hemorrhage was unrelated to the service-connected

hypertension. VA Form 70-7216a shows that "C" file temporarily

transfered to the VA medical center at time of request for VA

examination in August 1991. However, the record is unclear as to

whether the examiner had access to the appellant's claims folder

prior to rendering an opinion in this case. The Board is of the

opinion that the clinical records pertaining to the treatment for the

appellant's hypertension would be beneficial in making a

determination in this case."

This case was remanded due to question as to whether the examiner had all of the records-

It seems to me that in many cases the c file does not have to be present during the C & P.

However, if the C & P examiner's report overlooks pertinent parts of the c file the vet should certainly question that in the NOD if they denied the claim.

I think vets should feel free to definitely bring pertinent med records to a C & P if they feel these records would definitely help render a proper C & P exam. Why sit there wondering if the doctor is actually getting the point of your claim and what the focus of the C & P is on. It certainly pays to provide them with bonafide medical records that help your position- because even with the c file present- I dont see how they would possibly be able to go through it all anyhow.

Whether the C & P doc has the c file records or not- chances are they won't take the time to read them-

If key medical points are not brought up by the veteran, and are important to the claim, the vet should have these records to show the doc-the only other alternative would be, if the decision is not what they want based on the C & P-the veteran can mention this in their NOD- and then attach or refer to pertinent records that the doctor missed.

I helped a vet last year who brought his SMRs and many of his VA med recs to every C & P he had.By this time- last year-He knew the records in and out ,had them all tabbed,and after spending many frustrating years with his claim, he finally got an award.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta

If you get a rotten, biased, and incomplete C&P is their a faster way to get reexamined than going to the BVA? Now we are looking at threes maybe to get another remand, new C&P, and decision. I been there!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • In Memoriam

John --

There is a way to correct a defective C&P examination. All you have to do is to point it out line and verse to the RO in your NOD. substntive appeal, or stand-alone letter; and, if that doesn't work, to the DRO. In some RO's,, service reps have the power to schedule exams by themselves.

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Things might go faster by circumventing the C&P process. I went to the head of the department and explained the problem. I talked real quick and to the point. He decided to get involved. He told me to come back after the next clinic and he would review the records. In my case I was denied because they said I was not treated inservice for the disease. They used different terms for the same disease post service and inservice. He read the SMR and wrote a note as to his opinion in my VA medical record. I was service connected based on his report. I did not have a C&P exam. It won't hurt to give it a try. The doctor also told me that he scheduled appointments when asked to by service orginizations. I am sure not all hospitals will work the same

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jstacy

The C@P's are now computerized with a cookbook for the Doc to Follow. There is a place on the form in the computer that lists records reviewed. It breaks them down by service record, Va Record and other evidence.The Docs must say they reviewed them before they can approve an Exam. Usually another Doc has to also approve the Exam. If you need one I can attach an electronic copy of a recent one I had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Istacy,

Maybe t-bird could make this form available on the site. I took a standard nexus form letter from 2000 but I then told the doctor to make a reference to the reports he reviewed. He would not have done it if I did not tell him to. Take this new form with you to the hospital and get it filled out. I tell you, I circumvented the C%P process. I wished I would have figured it out earlier. The RO refused to schedule a C&P for five years. I went to one hospital who refused to help. Then when I moved I went to another hospital and they told me they had no problem helping me anyway they could with an issues of service connection. The guy in customer affairs told me they wrote these types of reports when asked by a veteran for the ten years he worked there. They could not believe that another hospital refused to write a note for me. I was refered to the clinic by customer affairs and when I got to the clinic the head of the department was very willing to write a note in my VA record. I sent his note to the RO and was service connected.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use