Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Agent Orange Proposed Rules No Show

Rate this question


vperl

Question

Here we are, no Proposed rules on federal registry.

Anyone surprised ?

Will that lauded legal battle start soon, or is that a suspect artifact of all this ?

I hope not/ to be silent means you are part of the problem

Good luck to us that have AO IHD claims.....

Edited by vperl

One Shot, One Shovel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Here we are, no Proposed rules on federal registry.

Anyone surprised ?

Will that lauded legal battle start soon, or is that a suspect artifact of all this ?

I hope not/ to be silent means you are part of the problem

Good luck to us that have AO IHD claims.....

No surprise here. Don't see how the threat of a law suit will make the VA move on these new presumptives any faster. By the time any law suit for not having the proposed regs written and published on time ever sees the inside of a court room they will have been published making the law suit moot. I would think the law firm that sent that letter to Secretary Shenseki with the Mar 12th deadline knows it would be a waste of time and money to pursue. IMHO the VA is taking it's sweet time on this so that they can cull out and/or low ball as many claims as possible before the new regs are published and then when they are published they will send out a mass mailing of denials and low balled claims and maybe only few will actually get a fair shake. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being one of many that have filed the AO claim, I await a decision that I had originally figured to be.... July 2010

Now I am thinking more like May 2011 for first silly decisions.

Silly as in, did they read the reports, claims, or did the RO actually know how to rate the claims ?

I suspect they will low ball me, because they did not notice one particular thing in my medical file that is listed

100 times, or more, and 5 times in the C&P exam that ought to get me 100% awaard....

I see the future and it is laughable, and predictable in VA speak

No surprise here. Don't see how the threat of a law suit will make the VA move on these new presumptives any faster. By the time any law suit for not having the proposed regs written and published on time ever sees the inside of a court room they will have been published making the law suit moot. I would think the law firm that sent that letter to Secretary Shenseki with the Mar 12th deadline knows it would be a waste of time and money to pursue. IMHO the VA is taking it's sweet time on this so that they can cull out and/or low ball as many claims as possible before the new regs are published and then when they are published they will send out a mass mailing of denials and low balled claims and maybe only few will actually get a fair shake.

One Shot, One Shovel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Every day the VA stalls another group of AO IHD vets dies. This is good business model for the VA. Waiting for others to file legal suits means your epitaph will be carved on your tomb stone..."He waited for justice. He died waiting."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use