Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just Received Increase Decision From Varo (great News)

Rate this question


Bound4heaven

Question

Greetings to all,

I just received my increase decision from my varo after 18 months Praise God!. They did not not include my new SMC level or my new monthy comp. I do not understand this am very confused at this decision. Can anyone help me.

My current rating is 100% T&P

50% SMC (Loss of use of extrimitys)

New % for increase 50% Mayofascial Strain

New % 40% (increased from 20%) Arm condition

New Increase Total is 70% effective date 18 months ago

The payment letter which I have always received (states payment will be made within 15 days) was not included. My new smc level was not included. My new monthy comp amount was also not included.

Did the person who sent this out make a mistake? can anyone give me any advice.

I do have 5 issues on appeal, however I would not think that should effect this at all, since there is no decison made. Thank you and God bless you.

Bound4Heaven

Edited by Bound4heaven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Best I can tell that would be the SMC L 1/2 award-

vet-spouse -one child 3363 per month and then 136 for the two additional children-

I agree with Bob- as he sees this-

"from what I see you have if they determine that you have loss of use of that arm or hand then you should be entitled to the next higgher rate at least...."

I feel that anyone asking for SMC should practically tell them what level they expect and why-

On the arm NOD- they will want evidence of loss of use of-

if it involves your hand- that means, unable to dial phone , pick up coins, write legibily-etc---

the arm condition will involve loss of abilty to flex elbow, loss of strength, stuff like that.

That is why these BVA decisions are so good as a reference- it takes time to search for similiar disabilities but then it shows why they awarded and at what level or why they didnt.

Do you have copy of all C & P results for these conditions?

Dear Berta,

Yes I do have copies of this C&P exam. I did foward a copy to them in regards to my NOD on my right shoulder in which they increased to 40% I asked for 60% and loss of use.

The question I have is that will I recieve addtional Comp for this new 70%? In the award letter they did say they grant an earlier effective date to 18 months ago. Thank you again and God bless you.

Bound4Heaven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I actually read your whole post so I understand a bit better.....heres a couple of things that may apply

(3) Additional independent 50 percent disabilities. In addition to the statutory rates payable under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) through (n) and the intermediate or next higher rate provisions outlined above, additional single permanent disability or combinations of permanent disabilities independently ratable at 50 percent or more will afford entitlement to the next higher intermediate rate or if already entitled to an intermediate rate to the next higher statutory rate under 38 U.S.C. 1114, but not above the (o) rate. In the application of this subparagraph the disability or disabilities independently ratable at 50 percent or more must be separate and distinct and involve different anatomical segments or bodily systems from the conditions establishing entitlement under 38 U.S.C. 1114(l) through (n) or the intermediate rate provisions outlined above. The graduated ratings for arrested tuberculosis will not be utilized in this connection, but the permanent residuals of tuberculosis may be utilized.

Also...

(5) Three extremities. Anatomical loss or loss of use, or a combination of anatomical loss and loss of use, of three extremities shall entitle a veteran to the next higher rate without regard to whether that rate is a statutory rate or an intermediate rate. The maximum monthly payment under this provision may not exceed the amount stated in 38 U.S.C. 1114(p).

Also...

(i) Total plus 60 percent, or housebound; 38 U.S.C. 1114(s). The special monthly compensation provided by 38 U.S.C. 1114(s) is payable where the veteran has a single service-connected disability rated as 100 percent and:

(1) Has additional service-connected disability or disabilities independently ratable at 60 percent, separate and distinct from the 100 percent service-connected disability and involving different anatomical segments or bodily systems, or

(2) Is permanently housebound by reason of service-connected disability or disabilities. This requirement is met when the veteran is substantially confined as a direct result of service-connected disabilities to his or her dwelling and the immediate premises or, if institutionalized, to the ward or clinical areas, and it is reasonably certain that the disability or disabilities and resultant confinement will continue throughout his or her lifetime.

Since you are seeking 60% I guess you already understand this...also

If you are recieving SMC at say L and you have another injury that would qualify you for L or higher as well...you go to O...ok?

It's a bit convoluted, but read thru it all and it kinda starts to make sense....from what I see you have if they determine that you have loss of use of that arm or hand then you should be entitled to the next higgher rate at least....

Bob Smith

Dear Bob,

Thank you for your response. The continueing question I have is will I receive any addtional comp for the NEW 70% in which they gave me an effective date of 18 months ago or will I get nothing? , and have wasted 18 months og fighting and many C&p exams. It appears that might be the case. I do thank you and God bless you.

Bound4Heaven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on this statement from the vA:

"They said that I was at my max in regards to SMC (They have never issued me a SMC Level, and that I was not going to be compansated even though they granted an effective date 18 months ago. They said I have reached my SMC limit" it looks like they are not going to send you any retro-

You will have to NOD that and ask them for the higher level that your medical evidence shows that you should be granted. I would certainly focus on the hand-arm disabilities and on the next level of SMC- which is either an M level or O-it is difficult to even contemplate the level because each case is so different.

The best thing to do is to read over the 38 1114 regs and see what category would be the highest one that reflects your SC disabilities and then shape the NOD to focus on the evidence that would prove that.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on this statement from the vA:

"They said that I was at my max in regards to SMC (They have never issued me a SMC Level, and that I was not going to be compansated even though they granted an effective date 18 months ago. They said I have reached my SMC limit" it looks like they are not going to send you any retro-

You will have to NOD that and ask them for the higher level that your medical evidence shows that you should be granted. I would certainly focus on the hand-arm disabilities and on the next level of SMC- which is either an M level or O-it is difficult to even contemplate the level because each case is so different.

The best thing to do is to read over the 38 1114 regs and see what category would be the highest one that reflects your SC disabilities and then shape the NOD to focus on the evidence that would prove that.

Dear Berta,

Thank you once again, Yes I will focus on the arm condition. I guess I still feel a little numb. It appears that the 18 months have been in vein. I will put it behind me and learn from it. Thank you and God bless you.

Bound4Heaven

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use