Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Oversight Of My Osa Claim - Qq?

Rate this question


bob_abad

Question

Hi gang,

Me again w/ this ongoing Sleep Apnea(OSA-incurred after service) battle w/ VA. I received another denial letter as of 03/15/10. Oh boy! VA made a terrible mistake on this one!

Here's the event summary:

> My c-file was brokered to Phoenix VARO (from Oakland VARO) around Dec '09 timeframe

> I forwarded my required evidence & docs to the Phoenix VA as per instructed. It included witness letters, IMO, OSA medical records, VA supplies & others.

> But almost at the same timeframe near the end of February, the Oakland VARO was getting ready to deny my claim again.

> There was a miscommunication between Phoenix & Oakland....Would you believe this??????

> Now my c-file was returned to Oakland. They sent the denial letter as of 03/15/10.

> I went to Oakland VARO to inquire if they received my SOC response from Phoenix..The answer was no!

> I was sooooo frustrated @VA for their major f%^& *p!!

> My 1st time to go to our local county VSO to seek assistance...She just shook her head re: VA and immediately followed up to re-open.

>Ok, my case was finally re-opened since 03/18/10.

According to IRIS, it is in development stage. Question is, how long will it be there and what is the next stage?

Hear from someone soon. Thanks!

From Bob,

4th Inf. Div; Central Highland Campaign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

bob_abad,

I think requesting a "re-open" was a poor game plan on the VSO's part.

First of all your OSA claim had not yet reached a point where the decision

was final.

Also, when you "re-open" with N&M you loose your EED.

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure agree-how do you re-open something that isnt closed?

Make sure the VSO has copies of your evidence/ If they didnt list it as Evidence n the denial it meant they didnt even read it and you might have to have the VSO submit it again.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

IMHO if you get a denial, then you need to file a NOD even if that denial was in error (or especially if it was in error).

By regulation, if you do not file a NOD a decision becomes final in one year. After one year, you can still dispute a decision but you must meet the very strict "Clear unmistakable error" standard.

If you got a bad decision, you want to file a NOD within a year...it preserves your rights. It is simply not in your best interest to have to meet the CUE standard if you dont have to. Go for easy..getting VA benefits is challenging enough without making it more difficult for you to meet the "Cue" standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bob_abad,

In your post you say that your OSA incurred after service. How are you service connecting this? Is this secondary to another service connection?

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use