Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C+p Examiner

Rate this question


aidenspapa

Question

SHE STATED IN HER C+P EXAM THAT MY SCHIZOPHRENIA/SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER WAS FIRST DIAGNOSED IN THE SERVICE AS PER THE SERVICE MEDICAL RECORDS.THEREFORE THE PERSONALITY DISORDER THAT THEY POSTED IN MY SEPERATION PAGES WAS INAPPROPRIATE( THIS IS THE VA C+P EXAMINER STATEING THIS)I WAS DENIED IT IS GOING TO DRO SOON,DO I HAVE A LEG TO STAND ON ACCORDING TO THE C+P EXAMINERS OWN REPORT,I WAS OFFERED SERVICE CONNECTION FROM PSYCH DRS IN USMC ON THE GROUNDS I TOOK MEDS.I REFUSED MEDS,YOUNG+STUPID.SO THEY PUT ME DOWN AS PERS DISORDER=NON COMPENSATIONAL.THANKS FOR FEEDBACK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"No,the first time i was denied was 15 years ago,they never gave rational for there denial. "

Do you have a copy of that decision?

Have you checked your C file for it?

Also have you applied for TDIU?

They might (and SHOULD from what I see here)award you 100% SC right off the bat-they MUST take the SSA records into consideration (Washington V Derwinski)

If they lowball you we can help there-

I wonder if the committed a CUE in the older decision.

If no Reasons or bases for denial something was drastically wrong.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depending on what the VA regulations stated when the VA gave you your first denial, not telling you WHY they denied could be a CUE.

How could you have filed a substantive 'notice of disagreement' (NOD) when nobody told you what you should disagree with?

Again, depending on the VA regulations and court precedent, that lack of information might have left your claim OPEN.

If not still open, the denial was never explained to you,

so you could not properly or timely NOD the darn thing.

(A typical VA ploy to encourage a veteran to just drop the whole thing.)

"was to scared of what was in pill,i declined so it was easy for the board at the time to give me general discharge with non compensatable disorder.BIG MISTAKE I MADE.Hopefully before i die i will get this thing.Thanks Hoppy."

The refusal to take medication might be listed as a major symptom of schizoaffective disorder in your case.

(I feel fine, therefore, I must be fine.)

That will involve an 'outside the VA' doctor.

On the other hand, simply telling you of the denial could be cause to initiate the NOD without any explanations at all.

That would kill your earlier effective date.

Hopfully, one of our better researchers can clear this up.

I'm leaning toward still open.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Is disturbs me when I see vets who are mentally ill being discharged for non-medical reasons like PD's. It makes it harder for the vet to get SC'ed and it is a way for the military to save money at the expense of the vet. Basically, a PD discharge is a slander if it is not true. Now that it has been over 15 years since discharge it is harder to get the discharge changed to what it should have been even with good evidence. You should have been getting benefits from the day you were discharged. I bet many thousands of Vietnam era vets were discharged as personality disorders who had PTSD and other mental health problems. Now that is real fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

A clerk at the VA in Waco decided that even though Medical evidence was there that I had Panic Disorder that it was a personality disorder. For anyone that has been set aside by the VA claiming you have a personality disorder ask the VA what the diagnostic code is and than review the symptom. More than likely you can put that white elephant to bed right than and there although it is possible to have a personality disorder and also a service connectible Mental Disorder

I hope that I made some kind of sense here.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Below is an argument I previously wrote for a veteran. We are still battling. I have a psychologist

who has worked at a VA for 20 years back me up on these arguments. The VA psychologist I

work with has been performing C&P’s for over ten years. She likes the way I write so she listens

to what I have to say.

_______________________________________________________

The C&P clinician found it difficult to justify an ongoing life long struggle obtaining and retaining

employment with a diagnosis of panic disorder. The C&P examiner advanced an explanation of

the employability problem as the result of a personality disorder NOS. Although the patient had

been evaluated at both the VAMC in La Jolla and Mission Valley the reports reviewed by me did

not identify a personality disorder diagnosis made by treating clinicians. It is my opinion that lifelong

difficulty obtaining and retaining employment can be explained both by a diagnosis of

personality disorder NOS and untreated panic disorder. The Veteran first developed panic

disorder in his early twenties while on active duty. Based on the reports of record and

considering the reality of this patients long term untreated panic disorder any symptoms

interfering with employability cannot be isolated as due to a personality disorder NOS.

Personality disorders can be diagnosed when manifested by a lifelong pattern of action or

behavior. However, the known onset of panic disorder in the early twenties which went untreated

makes establishment of a lifelong pattern that can be attributed to personality disorder

speculative.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What I really hate is when a C&P examiner asks those leading questions that point a DX in the direction of a PD. If a vet is not experienced they may answer some of these leading questions in a way that can be interpreted to sound like a PD. For instance, if exam doctor asks if you ever experimented with drugs or got into a fight in high school. Did you ever argue with your parents? The kiss of death is have you ever been arrested for anything. You just bought yourself a PD diagnosis of "sociopathic personality disorder".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use