Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can You Sue The Military For Malpractice

Rate this question


Hoppy

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

In the veterans case he developed a condition in the military. He went to the docs and the doc's noted in the SMR that there was no treatment for the condition. Recently the veteran obtained an opinion that there was treatment available. The literature states that an individual with the untreated condition is 8 times more likely to develop severe symptoms if the early symptoms go untreated., The veteran is now diagnosed with the severe condition. The veteran can show evidence that the severe symptoms have been occuring for thirty years. The VA will only cover the last two years since the claim was filed. The paper trail is strong and intact.

I might have to ask a lawyer this question.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hoppy,

If the vet is wanting to file a FTC the rule is it has to be filed in Federal Court within

two years of the claimant becoming aware of the malpractice.

Sorry, I just noticed the topic title deals with "Can You Sue The Military For Malpractice"

and I was thinking of the VAMC.

Doesn't the Ferries Doctrine prohibit law suits against DOD for malpractice ?

jmho,

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Carlie you have BINGO the military has been using the Feres decision to protect idiot doctors since the 1950 decision was handed down by SCOTUS and even if the doctor kills you there is no legal recourse a military doctor blinded ny step father in 1974 at March AFB and then they sent him to Balboa where the Naval eye surgeon made the problem worse when they did a laser surgery to try and correct what the AF doctor did the Naval doctor missed and put a small whole in the back of the eye, which caused fluid to seep out and the eye shriveled and he got a glass eye that was their solution he was retired AF when they did this their only gesture is that since my momm had to take time off from her job to drive him to March Field Hospital for his doctor appointments they never had to wait Dale was always called on time and she did not have to waste her entire day sitting around the hospital but they would not pay any financial compensation and I think the Naval doc got a reprimand in his file which I don't think bothered him much he was just counting his days until he could go practice in the civilian world and make some real money.....Feres is the military medicals get out of jail free card and you can't sue me all the soldier and their family get is frustration even trying

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joanne-doroshow/for-veterans-day-lets-fix_b_353462.html

This article (and the show they did on deceased war veteran Rodriguez)shows the chilling ramifcations of the Feres Doctrine.

I wonder sometimes what other nations in the world think of the Feres Doctrine and the lack of accountability it has insured the military medical system for decades.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

As far as suing the military I think they have sovereign immunity. If they hurt you they have to pay in the form of disability compensation. It is like when I worked for civilian feds. If you get hurt on the job even if it is due to their negligence all you can get is workers compensation. Hell, you have to get a lawyer for that sometimes. Example: Soldier gets hurt on battlefield. The doctors trying to save his life make mistakes that cause him major malfucntions later in life. Can you sue those doctors? I don't think you can but you can get compensation I think. I am thinking off the top of my head. Suing institutions is a lot harder than you might think. They get protection from congress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I am thinking of looking into retroactive military retirement. I remember this came up about 10 years ago. I can't remember much about it.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey hoppy.

In answer to your topic, no you can't sue the millitary for medical malpractice for the time period you were on active duty or reserve. But you can sue them if the malpractice happened after you were discahrged. you can find that info here:

http://www.chalatlaw.com/FTCA-Military-Medical-Malpractice-Claims.html

"The most familiar, and arguably, the most unfair, exception to the FTCA, is known as the FERES (pronounced "fairies") doctrine, which takes its name from an old United States Supreme Court decision, FERES v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950). Under the FERES doctrine, members of the United States armed forces are barred from making a claim against the United States for personal injury or death arising "incident to service." Military medical treatment received by a service member, while he/she is on active duty has been held by the courts to be "incident to service," and, thus not actionable, even if that treatment was for a purely elective procedure, and even if the procedure was performed negligently. The FERES doctrine has also been applied to bar cases by service members in which the negligence, such as being exposed to Agent Orange, occurred while the service member was on active duty, but, where the injury did not become apparent until many years after the service member had been discharged. " © Copyright 2010. Chalat Hatten & Koupal PC. All Rights Reserved

If you are thinking about getting a military discharge upgrade to medical discharge or medical retirement you can check out this hadit thread:

I am thinking of looking into retroactive military retirement. I remember this came up about 10 years ago. I can't remember much about it.

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use