Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Happens After A Nod Is Filed

Rate this question


HvyGns38

Question

If a person is denied a SC'd claim and he/she files an NOD, what is the next steps in the process? Which route would be the best and expeditious to take?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The next step in the process is the decison to either do a DRO appeal or go directly to BVA. The NOD is supposed to trigger a statement of the case from the VA. The VA usually asks you if you want to do a DRO or go directly to the BVA. I would do a DRO Hearing if I were you. Two bites at the appple. You can keep getting new evidence and submitting it after the NOD is filed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

trying to get the VA to even recognize the word "expedient" is a waste of time you are now on the "hamster wheel" but I agree with what John told you maybe with a little luck you can get a DRO hearing within a year BVA is around a 2 year wait with the DRO you get 2 chances at a "Good decision" with the BVA you only get one chance if the DRO denies you you will have the chance to get a IMO or IME to strengthen your case after the DRO if necessary you can add new evidence even at your BVA hearing you just can't add new stuff at the CAVC level then it is all about case law and process I have never done a CAVC but that is my understanding of it

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

take the dro process frist it can work get all doc reports and exit exam report see what they say your condition is.

go on bva site and type in your condition to see how those case were won or lose.

make copy of the winner and make your case off of that

my two cents lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOD DeNova Review request(they are supposed to do this but request it anyway as it is obvious they cut corners and some don't...So yes DRO request , De Novo review, and YES personal hearing with DRO...My face to face DRO hearing took 7 mths to set it up after request,I requested 2 hrs as had 2 conditions to present too, but lasted 1 3/4 hrs, and almost 7 mths to get the transcripts of it(only 1/2 received/as they left out all the info I gave of faulty NP Biatch name/exam/lies/all the truthful things I presented on one of the 2 cases I presented...7 mths or so later got the VARO to cue itself and one claim went to 50% but other went to BVA.

Make sure you are orderly with all the NEW evidence you present at the personal hearing too! Follow other comments here by other knowledgable vets too...Good Luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Keep in mind that evidence is what wins claims and if you have the evidence you will win eventually. Getting the VA to read the evidence is another matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for all the replies.

I am going to go ahead and file an NOD for my denial for Meniere's disease. I am compensated 10% for hearing loss and 10% for tinnitus, but they never addressed the vertigo that I have only the hearing loss itself. I had surgery two years after getting out because of the bouts vertigo and hearing loss, but the VA claims that there is nothing in my SMR to support my claim. However, I have seen 2 or 3 civillian Dr.'s that say hearing loss is the onset of Meniere's disease, which occured during active duty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use