Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bilateral And Other Questions

Rate this question


ruby

Question

I had a DRO hearing 2 months ago and just had my new comp exams.

"The examiner is asked to provide an opinion, if it is as likely as not that the claimed condition is the same as or is a result of HS shown during active duty."

The examiner stated:

"The following medical opinion reached based on extensively reviewing of the C-files, medical records at VAMC and medical literatures."

It is the opinion of this examiner that this veteran's wide spread arthropathy/pain/arthritis/degenerative changes that involves in multiple joints, hands and axial skeletal (spine) are at least as likely as not a result of HS as shown during active duty."

The examiner then supported her opinion with medical rationale and supporting medical literature.

A. Since the examiner was asked if it is as likely as not and she stated at least as likely as not---Will this create a problem?

2. If the limitation of motion of the specific joint or joints involved is noncompensable under the codes a rating of 10 percent is for application for each such major joint or group of minor joints affected by lom. LOM must be objectively confired by findings such as swelling, muscle spasm or satisfactory evidence of painful motion.

B. If 10 joints ie shoulders, elbows, hands, knees and ankles bilateral show evidence of swelling and pain am I correct that I may recieve 10% for each joint using the bilateral factor.

C. If I have bilateral radiculopathy at the C6-C7 dermatomes this rating would be seperate of the rating for ROM for the cervical spine ?

D. If the C&P examiner stated that the pain, decreased rom and swelling have a significant impact on employment ( SSD for arthritis) is this normally sufficient to get IU if I don't get 100% secular

C. While I didn't ask for an increase the DRO had all my SC conditions re-evaluated. I haven't had a PFT in 5 years, will this hold up my claim while I am waiting for this test. I could possibly recieve an increase from 30% to 50% for my asthma but I doubt it (at least I hope not based on PFT's). I have documented asthma attacks throughout the year and I am currently on 4 inhalers for my asthma to prevent attacks (has been successful to a point-decreased steriod use).

While no one knows what the DRO will do does anyone know what should be done.

I will say that the DRO I had was polite and told me exactly what was going to happen. Once the hearing was transcribed (25 days) he would request a comp exam (30days) when he recieved the info he would finish my claim and send out the results. I am hoping he will have my results to me within the next 30 days as he as done everything he said he would do within the timeframe he gave me.

I would have to say that I have nothing but nice things to say regarding the DRO process or at least this DRO, up to this point. Yes, my opinion will change if he denies my claim.

I hoping my adventure with the VA claims process will soon be over. Thanks for any help on my questions.

Ruby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Ruby:

Looks pretty good from what you posted. All any of us can ask for is a fair and impartial examination of the facts and yes I think your C&P is enough.

Good Luck

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The bilateral thing is supposed to increase your rating via a formula. It could be a factor in getting over the hump to IU. The higher your rating the less it impacts your rating. I have bilateral factor in both legs and arms. It has tiny inpact on my rating which is 90%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks John, guess I will just have to wait and see if I get IU or secular.

Just got a call that my PFT is scheduled for next week, I may get an answer within the month. I hope this DRO is really true to his word.

Ruby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use