Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Mmpi

Rate this question


RSG

Question

I have taken two of these MMPI tests... In both case given By a C&P examiner....I scored so far out of the "NORM" that niether could be rated.....Should those be included

in any correspondence with reference to My claim for IU....

Tnx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

These tests from what I understand of them, are only useful if the shrink feels the participates have complied and done there best to answer and show a pattern. If they feel they are worthless and not completed properly they will be thrown out.

Now that being said I am not implying you did not do your best but sounds like given you the tests shows no benefit to an analysis.

I would ask for a written letter from the shrink as to why they are not being used.

Edited by stillhere
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The MMPI has a scale that is supposed to show if a test taker is exaggerating their symptoms. The way I think it works with the VA is that if they don't like the results of your MMPI they say you are exaggerating your symptoms. The VA prefers the 15 minute exam by a QTC doctor. The MMPI must be interpreted by trained psychologist. That is too expensive and might show the vet has a compensable condition. The MMPI is a good test. I believe the VA does not use it because of cost. Cost drives everything the VA does. If you took a MMPI given by the VA it should be used as evidence unless the VA can show that the vet did knowingly exaggerate their symptoms. That is why they ask the same question ten times to see if answers are consistent. Back in the day the VA gave me the Ink Blot test. The raters just ignored the result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that answers the question or quote "NORM" that the VA uses, if the answers given are not what the VA wants them to be, they are just rejected.... It seems that with documented evidence of GAF scores of 40 or below consistently, for years

and all that goes with documented years of evidence, that the VA would have to use that testing for reference when deciding claims.....Especially if it was a valid (ACTUAL) test...But , I guess that is why the VA shrink Rated it out of the "NORM"....cause it was not valid in her eyes.....

Edited by RSG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

RSG

Remember who is doing the actual rating on your claim: A person with no medical or legal training. They don't know how to evaluate your MMPI results. They don't know how to evaluate the psychologist's summary of the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having taken my share of MMPI and other similiar type psychological tests, I have found that embedded in the tests are questions that help the scorer to determine if the person is being truefull and/or deceptive in the way the questions are being answered .

Being so outside the norms opinion may be their way of saying that they had problems with the way you answered your questions, that being so outside the normal way to score, they could not correlate the test scores to your given symtomology. I would ask for a retest and if possible, from a different examiner. If you cannot get a viable score or if you do not receive the same results, then I would look else where for evidence that can be scored and where a valid opinion can be given..

These tests, such as the MMPI, have been tweeked over the years and having survived the test of times, they are a good tool for determining what type of psychological probems one might have, however they are not the sole determining factor that would be used to give an opinion and/or diagnosis. To give an example, not only did I take the MMPI, I had other such tests and periods of observation that determined their opinion and diagnosis, none of which has change except in severity of my symptomology.

Keep after your Psychologist or Psychiatrist for a definite opinion that would also include a supported diagnosis of your problem. If they do not help you in this, you have but one choice, but to seek an IMO

elsewhere, more than likely outside the VA system and into the private sector.

Good Luck, and I do mean it, getting a definite and supported psychological opinion I have found, is considerably more difficult than most medical problems, that the VA will accept for rating purposes.

Rockhound Rider :cool:

Are you a paranoid schizophrenic

if the ones you think are out to

get you, really are?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use