Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Smc S

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got a email for lawyers at the NLVSP and they say Bradley is settled law. There was an attempt by the VA to upset it in 2009, but it failed so if you are IU plus 60% go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

John....In Bradley they state IU is the same as 100% disabled when deciding an SMC claim, do you know if the 60% is one disability that is rated at 60% or can it be a culmination of ratings that equal 60% or greater..For instance I have TDIU as a rating then I have a 70% plus about 6 20% ratings and 3 10% ratings....Are they saying that TDIU is in itself a rating or are they raising let's say the 70% rating to 100% TDIU so therefore the 70% cannot be used again in deciding a higher level of AA??

I got a email for lawyers at the NLVSP and they say Bradley is settled law. There was an attempt by the VA to upset it in 2009, but it failed so if you are IU plus 60% go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would apply.

pr

John....In Bradley they state IU is the same as 100% disabled when deciding an SMC claim, do you know if the 60% is one disability that is rated at 60% or can it be a culmination of ratings that equal 60% or greater..For instance I have TDIU as a rating then I have a 70% plus about 6 20% ratings and 3 10% ratings....Are they saying that TDIU is in itself a rating or are they raising let's say the 70% rating to 100% TDIU so therefore the 70% cannot be used again in deciding a higher level of AA??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is attorney Ron Abram's testimony to H VAC on SMC and Bradley:

http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/Testimony.aspx?TID=59742&Newsid=442&Name=%20Ronald%20B.%20Abrams

100% SC or TDIU SC plus an independent service connected disability at 60 % equals SMC s award.

The key wording is 'independent'.

Personal example:

My husband was 100% SC for PTSD.

He had "independent" DMII, IHD, and as well as CVA found as due to his AO exposure.

The IHD alone requires 60% rating per the AO IHD regs.( The VA has never rated this FTCA disability but has to now under Nehmer and the new IHD regs ans resolve my CUE as to the lack of rating)

100% SC for PTSD plus 60% for SC IHD equals SMC "S" award.

I think he is eligible for "M" because the evidence indicates that at some point his IHD was 100% and it caused his death, and his CVA (SC) was 100%.

Three separate and independent SC awards at 100% with SMC S eligibility should garner the SMC M Award.

(that is a very unusual situation and maybe this will help someone else)

But my point here is that the regs say "independent " disabilities and as far as I know the additional independent disabilty for the "S" award must be rated at least at 60%.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just to clarify-

3 independent 100% SC awards that satisfy the steps up to SMC "L" levels should garner the M award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta...I think I understand what you are saying and that is the 60% rating cannot be a culmination of ratings that will equal the 60% or how the VA applies their math in computing the 60%. You say the key word is "Independent"...now I read here, where the Statute is saying if the veteran

has additional service connected disability or "disabilities" (meaning more than one)....are they saying the culmination of "disabilities" need to be independent of the 100% rating or TDIU or are they saying as I think what I understand you to be saying is that it needs to be a 60% rating in and of itself without adding multiple disabilities to get to the 60% rating? (God, that's confusing even for me and I wrote it....) I know what I mean but sometimes it doesn't flow out from my mind onto print...so forgive me if you are confused in what I am asking..

38 U.S.C. § 1114(s) provides that SMC at the (s) rate will be granted if a veteran has a service-connected disability rated as total, and (1) has additional service-connected disability or disabilities independently ratable at 60 percent or more, or (2) is permanently housebound by reason of a service-connected disability or disabilities.

This is attorney Ron Abram's testimony to H VAC on SMC and Bradley:

http://veterans.hous...d%20B.%20Abrams

100% SC or TDIU SC plus an independent service connected disability at 60 % equals SMC s award.

The key wording is 'independent'.

Personal example:

My husband was 100% SC for PTSD.

He had "independent" DMII, IHD, and as well as CVA found as due to his AO exposure.

The IHD alone requires 60% rating per the AO IHD regs.( The VA has never rated this FTCA disability but has to now under Nehmer and the new IHD regs ans resolve my CUE as to the lack of rating)

100% SC for PTSD plus 60% for SC IHD equals SMC "S" award.

I think he is eligible for "M" because the evidence indicates that at some point his IHD was 100% and it caused his death, and his CVA (SC) was 100%.

Three separate and independent SC awards at 100% with SMC S eligibility should garner the SMC M Award.

(that is a very unusual situation and maybe this will help someone else)

But my point here is that the regs say "independent " disabilities and as far as I know the additional independent disabilty for the "S" award must be rated at least at 60%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use