Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Earlier Date Of Claim

Rate this question


mrsvet28

Question

I am wondering why you need to claim a specific disability for an eed- isnt the original application enough with the disbilities that most were successful after 11 years.

march sent 21-4138/ to open

they withdrew it in June dont know why-

then replied in July to that

now it is a cue in Sept.

award was Nov 09,- anybody make sense of this-

Thanks MrsVet

post-3016-056878200 1286041389_thumb.jpg

post-3016-004915600 1286044039_thumb.jpg

post-3016-093818200 1286044119_thumb.jpg

post-3016-047478200 1286044269_thumb.jpg

post-3016-026013800 1286044301_thumb.jpg

post-3016-091869100 1286044342_thumb.jpg

post-3016-009242500 1286044381_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

If the VA treats your claim as a CUE it is much harder to prove.

thats what happened with the last one-and it took 11 years- a way around it

what do you think of the downloads -do they make sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

What I know is that if your rating became final the only way to change it is usually with a CUE. If the claim has remained open for years due to VA's neglect it is easier. If you filed a claim in 1990 and it remained open until you recently got an award then the ED should be 1990.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I know is that if your rating became final the only way to change it is usually with a CUE. If the claim has remained open for years due to VA's neglect it is easier. If you filed a claim in 1990 and it remained open until you recently got an award then the ED should be 1990.

Talked to the woman from IRIS inquiry she really did call back-sent and faxed all the papers-so we will see what happens-they tried to say put in a a form 9-but it was never being appealed, I opened it as a new claim, and finally got them to accept the 214138. we'll see what happens -willvkeep posting :rolleyes: on the progress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with Carlie.

It appears they sent a SOC dated 7/12/2000 with denials of all claimed conditions -referencing a request for proof of continuity of disabilities dated 8/13/99 and they stated that they received no reply to that request.

If you provided the evidence they asked for, (treatment records ,etc) and have proof of mailing it to them-you should raise that issue.

I had a hard time reading the downloads.

I don't know if the claim the SOC is based on would have fallen under the VCAA but still a VCAA letter would have requested the same thing.

What did they award in Nov 2009?

If this is to re open what appears to be a claim denied because they didnt receive the evidence they requested- you need to send them new and material evidence to re open the claim.

"I am wondering why you need to claim a specific disability for an eed- isnt the original application enough with the disbilities that most were successful after 11 years."

No. The earliest entitlement date for one disability might be greatly different from another disability.

TDIU and 100% SC awarded claims can sometimes warrant an earlier EED if the veteran received SSA solely for the exact same disability but these awards are usually only for one more year of retro.

Personal example:

Husband was 30 SC PTSD 1984

applied for higher PTSD rating Oct 1992 by letter

SSA awarded solely for PTSD EED Nov 1991.

applied for TDIU in 1992 on 21-8940 but this form was never acknowledged by VA.

(also filed 1151 claim March 1994)

posthumously awarded 100% SC PTSD July 1997, with EED of Nov 1, 1991 for 100% PTSD (same date of unemployability of SSA award)

Sec 1151 and FTCA award in 1997/1998

Obviously these were pending claims I had to re-open under my name after he died and continued to send them evidence.

The PTSD award involved evidence outside of the extensive psychological tests he had as well as years of PTSD therapy.

Such as an EEOC case he had against the VA.And personnel records from his employers.And 2 hospitalizations for PTSD.He had continuity of treatment since the first day of his diagnosis in 1984 and probably should have asked for an increase much sooner than he did.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use