Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question On Sexual Assault Trauma - TRIGGERS

Rate this question


airdale

Question

  • Answers 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I am new to this so I don't know what NOD is. I know that my appeal is with the DRO. My denial letter for the PTSD was dated 2004. I don't recall multiple issues in the denial, but at the time of filing, I did not have my C-File. With douments from my C-File, I filed my (I believe this is the NOD) appeal in late 2004. I do have a service rep -- that's the POA, right?

1. What is the date of your denial letter?

2. Were there multiple issues in the denial?

3. Have you filed the NOD?

4. Do you have a service rep?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May 18 1972

Airdale

Have you ever tried to get a lawyer to represent you in front of the VA? I think your claim is beyond most VSO's. Most are not up to it. However, it may be possible that since you have a DX of PTSD your claim may succeed. The more time passes and the more complex your claim becomes the more you need expert help. Because you have HIV the VA is probably apt to blame all your problems on the HIV. Your private medical records would be a big help if the VA does not have them. When was your last final decision from the VA? It is natural that the older your claims become the more things can happen to you. The VA looks for the non service connected reasons to explain your disability.

Edited by airdale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Did the VA diagnose you with PTSD? Forget about going public since nobody gives a damn. Are you claiming the PTSD as direct result of sexual assault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am new to this so I don't know what NOD is. I know that my appeal is with the DRO. My denial letter for the PTSD was dated 2004. I don't recall multiple issues in the denial, but at the time of filing, I did not have my C-File. With douments from my C-File, I filed my (I believe this is the NOD) appeal in late 2004. I do have a service rep -- that's the POA, right?

Just trying to get this service connected is going to be a haul if you ask me. In your particular place if the appeal is denied and you still want to pursue it I would recommend you get a good lawyer.

And here is the reason why. Because this occurred so many years ago and there is no paper work or witnesses and from what I read you have no names and for that matter not even the exact location or time. This is asking the government to take your word for an awful lot. I am not trying to dissuade you and if you have come this long I doubt that I could. But put yourself in the governments position. That also will help you in maybe getting this done.

Also go back and read your decision somewhere in the decision the government is telling you what you need to do to get this awarded. Post what they feel they need and maybe we can help with that.

The main thing that I think comes out of claims like this is the reality that no matter how much you hate it and the horrible thought of this crap happening. Those that do not report it when it happens or soon after have a very hard road to haul.

I served in the late 60's-70's and maybe I was just naive to what was going on around me but I served in a war zone and for the life of me don't think I met another American that would have done harm to me. Lucky I guess but when we look at the complexity of military life and the scope (world wide) and with the sexual stuff going on in it nothing will be done until those that are assaulted come forward every single time something like this happens!!

Thank you for your service and I too am very sorry for what you had to go through back then and what you having to go through now but I do wish you the BEST and thank you for your service to our country!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wrote up a report on my stressors and triggers at the request of POA. My biggest problem obtaining documents has been with Naval Investigative Service. They interviewed me as I explained, I know that they did and there was an investigation.

airdale,

What exact disability's did you originally claim on your VA Form 21-526 ?

What from that was granted ?

What from that was denied ?

You posted,

"I learned a lot. The female victims like myself had become sexual addicts, which I did not know happened."

Just to be clear, the above is not something, that always happens, although it might happen, with some.

Below is information for you that shows the type of alternative evidence that may corroborate a stressor incident

for personal assault of a sexual nature.

If you have evidence such as this, it is important to put it in your claim.

http://www4.va.gov/v...es1/0903034.txt

If a PTSD claim is based on an in-service personal assault,

evidence from sources other than the veteran's service

records may corroborate the veteran's account of the

stressor incident.

Examples of such evidence include, but

are not limited to: records from law enforcement

authorities, rape crisis centers, mental health counseling

centers, hospitals, or physicians; pregnancy tests or tests

for sexually transmitted diseases; and statements from

family members, roommates, fellow service members or clergy.

Evidence of behavior changes following the claimed assault

is one type of relevant evidence that may be found in these

sources.

Examples of behavior changes that may constitute

credible evidence of the stressor include, but are not

limited to the following: a request for a transfer to

another military duty assignment; deterioration in work

performance; substance abuse; episodes of depression, panic

attacks or anxiety without an identifiable cause; or

unexplained economic or social behavior changes.

The VA

will not deny a PTSD claim that is based on in-service

personal assault without first advising the claimant that

evidence from sources other than the veteran's service

records or evidence of behavior changes may constitute

credible supporting evidence of the stressor and allowing

him or her the opportunity to furnish this type of evidence

or advise VA or potential sources of such evidence. VA may

submit any evidence that it receives to an appropriate

medical or mental health professional for an opinion as to

whether it indicates that a personal assault occurred. See

38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)(3).

Edited by airdale
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, VA diagnosed PTSD. I am claiming PTSD as direct result from SA. Going public is an option, like I said I have enough for a novel.

Did the VA diagnose you with PTSD? Forget about going public since nobody gives a damn. Are you claiming the PTSD as direct result of sexual assault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use