Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

At What Point Should You Obtain A Lawyer

Rate this question


Ryguy

Question

I'm in the middle of my appeal for my upper back and neck chronic issues. I was previously denied these issues back in 2007 from Atlanta VA. I've moved now and the DRO is reviewing my claim in the city in which I now live. The VFW Rep. did tell me my case would be decided by February 27, 2010.

My doctor from the VA in Atlanta wrote in his notes that i had chronic upper back and neck ridoculpathy which was service related and he recommended my past employer take note of this when giving me work assignments.

My current doctor wrote in his notes that all my neck and upper back problems are subsequent of the accident I was involved in and that it is more likely than not related to the accident. He also wrote in his notes that he recommends me to appeal the VA's denial decision.

So my question is, if i'm denied again with the traditional dro review, Should i jump the gun and get an attorney, I saw so many positive results with attornies on this website.

*I am also getting a buddy statement from someone i recently found on facebook who remembers my neck and upper back conditions.

*Do you Hadit Pro's think I still need an IMO for this type of case

Thank you guys for all you do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

On Lawyers: IMHO you should get a lawyer only AFTER you have been denied at the BVA level UNLESS you wind up on a VARO-BVA remand VARO yo-yo, or if your claim is "stuck" at AMC..then you could consider having a lawyer write you a Writ of Mandamus. Writs can also be written by the Veteran, but I wrote one and they are a lot of work! A Writ is the equivilant of writing a term paper for college such as one needed for your Bachelors or even Masters Thesis. If you dont have some computer/research skills or have a very good friend who does, then you probably need an attorney to write them.

IMHO hiring a lawyer at the RO or DRO levels is a waste of money. Even at the BVA level it is usually not necessary IMHO.

But dont go to the CAVC alone...get a lawyer at the CAVC..JMHO. As mentioned an exception is a Writ of Mandamus filed at CAVC provided you have access to good research skills. Several people on this board have filed Writs pro se.

ON value of IME's/IMO's: If your doc wont give you a nexus statement, and you have fired him and the second VA doc also refuses, time to look for an IMO/IME. But I would ask at least TWO VA docs to provide the nexus statement first. I did not need an IMO/IME because I found a "Vetran friendly" doc at my local VA...basically I asked "old Vets" at the hospital, and figured it out from talking to Vets. IMO's/IME's can cost what a used car costs, but several people on here say they are worth it. The trouble with buying IMO/IME's is that when you need them, you usually dont have the money.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ohhh wow. Thanks for the information, I just saw someone's results from an attorney and thought it would be a easier route. But I understand fully now. So do you think wtih the statements that my doctors wrote that will be enough or is an IMO definitely necessary?? I just was trying to avoid bothering a doctor for a IMO. I guess if I was justice its something i may have to consider

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I think if you have a claim where you feel you are over your head it might be a good idea to get a lawyer after you get denied and file your NOD. Some of the chemical poisoning claims and CUE claims are examples of claims where a lawyer might help if you get into legal questions and not just evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"More likely than not" is better than "at least as likely than not", which is supposed to give a 50/50 probability. If you have a doctor's statement with that, it is great.

Personally, I had a NOVA lawyer assist me with my NOD, and ended up being awarded 100% SC P&T. He didn't even charge me, as I had all the evidence gathered for the NOD, and said he would have charged me if we had to go to hearing; which he was willing to represent my case for me.

Just my two cents worth...

"It is a terrible thing, when you lose your train of thought and you only have a one track mind"... Me

96C2P/96F2P (old MOS designations)

97E2P/37F2P (new MOS designations)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, Thanks Guys. Bonzai, may I ask where did you find your lawyer at? I'm just trying to get all my ducks in a row, just in case the Review Officer comes back with a denial decision. I have faith that its going to work out in my favor, but i've been dealing with this claim since 2007, and the proof is everywhere, Im submitting a buddy statement and I think that should suffice evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My lawyer was a local lawyer in Jackson, TN that my wife's Social Security lawyer recommended. He told us the lawyer was a member of NOVA (National Organization of Veterans Advocates), so I went to him.

The funny thing is, my lawyer is no longer handling new veterans cases, but the Social Security lawyer has now become a NOVA lawyer; so all new referrals go to him. It seems that my lawyer has decided to stick with just Social Security. Very sad, because when I went to see him, he wrote up my NOD in about 15 minutes. He even got my entire C-file sent to his office, where his secretary copies it all to a CD, and then gave me the C-file and electronic copy.

Mind you, I am not saying that all NOVA lawyers would do what mine did for free, but I shall be eternally grateful to the lawyer who helped me; because I was at a loss - had all my evidence, but no idea of how to proceed. I wasn't a member of HadIt then...

"It is a terrible thing, when you lose your train of thought and you only have a one track mind"... Me

96C2P/96F2P (old MOS designations)

97E2P/37F2P (new MOS designations)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use