Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veldrina - A Couple Of Questions

Rate this question


Philip Rogers

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

I've just found out I've been awarded the same new 10% disability for each of my legs. It also states the bilateral factor is "1.9", which I assume to mean an actual award of 19%, combined, which would round up to 20%. Am I correct, and if not what is the total??? Also, when considering the 100% + 60%, required for SMC, do they use VA math, or normal math, when combining to meet the 60% required???

Thank you!!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

"The VA denied my housebound and A&A yrs ago and have fought me all the way."

And the denials hold the keys to how to succeed now.

It is certainly possibe that VA logic was correct years ago Philip-but in time almost every disability we have gets worse and could put a vet into a SMC criteria.

Do you have an older decision for 100%SC plus 60% Independent SC disability and they denied you in that decisions for SMC at "S" level?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with Veldrina here on the post from Pete as to agoraphobia in this way-

VA will consider agora[hobia as part of a mental disorder:

. Resolving reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor, the

criteria for a rating of 70 percent, but no more, for panic

disorder with agoraphobia and depression, were met as of March

24, 2005. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 4.130,

Code 9912 (2010).

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp10/files4/1039955.txt

I think she might have wondered how Pete could have 100% for anxiety or PTSD and then 60 % SMC S for agoraphobia too- as this is not an independent separate disability.

I feel that this is difficult to understand as a rating .I also have never seen agoraphobia stand alone as a ratable disability.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta - I was originally rated 100% schedular, for PTSD, by the BVA, retro 10 yrs, but the infered issue of HB and A&A was originally missed but I corrected them and it was denied. I had applied for HB and/or A&A within one yr of the decision but was denied. It has been under appeal since. It even went to the court where my atty won a remand. At this point I qualify for the SMC "S" award under 100+60, as I now have other disabilities. The VA has taken so long, w/this case, that even I question whether I qualify for HB, at this point. I should have been awarded it, way back, as it was believed to be permanent, then. The BVA has even requested that they decide whether my PTSD disability kept me from going to work. The C&P doc wouldn't speculate, so I expect the case to be remanded, once again. I'm about to secure an IMO and submit it. If I won they'd owe me about $60k but I doubt it'll win.

pr

"The VA denied my housebound and A&A yrs ago and have fought me all the way."

And the denials hold the keys to how to succeed now.

It is certainly possibe that VA logic was correct years ago Philip-but in time almost every disability we have gets worse and could put a vet into a SMC criteria.

Do you have an older decision for 100%SC plus 60% Independent SC disability and they denied you in that decisions for SMC at "S" level?

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

In Pete's case, I believe he's getting the SMC "S" award for agoraphobia due to being HB, not due to an additional 60%, as that's what agoraphobia does. I don't think it's 2 mental ratings. But that's jmo! Doesn't really matter as long as he gets it, right?

pr

I am with Veldrina here on the post from Pete as to agoraphobia in this way-

VA will consider agora[hobia as part of a mental disorder:

. Resolving reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor, the

criteria for a rating of 70 percent, but no more, for panic

disorder with agoraphobia and depression, were met as of March

24, 2005. 38 U.S.C.A. § 1155 (West 2002); 38 C.F.R. § 4.130,

Code 9912 (2010).

http://www4.va.gov/vetapp10/files4/1039955.txt

I think she might have wondered how Pete could have 100% for anxiety or PTSD and then 60 % SMC S for agoraphobia too- as this is not an independent separate disability.

I feel that this is difficult to understand as a rating .I also have never seen agoraphobia stand alone as a ratable disability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes-I think that must be what Pete means too.

"Berta - I was originally rated 100% schedular, for PTSD, by the BVA, retro 10 yrs, but the infered issue of HB and A&A was originally missed but I corrected them and it was denied. I had applied for HB and/or A&A within one yr of the decision but was denied."

If your medical evidence warranted either A & A or HB at that time Philip- and if they had the evidence in their possession at that time-they should have awarded this benefit.

As you know I have CUE on SMC regarding my deceased husband.

When they made my 1151 DIC award in 1998 they said it was due to myocardial ischemia, and cerebral vascular ischemia (from the IHD) causing death directly from the VA malpractice of the IHD and the CVA and HBP etc etc

The decision had no SMC statement (1151ers get SMC if the med evidence warrants it)

Nor did it have a IHD rating.They have still failed to rate his IHD (all above are now AOs (BVA award last year)

I realised that the VA could have said they denied SMC possibly due to the fact that although the VA OGC reports contain considerable evidence of his IHD and CVA etc-

that they did not know of the IHD disability and therefore no SMC.

But they did know of the CVA -still no SMC-

My point is that the VA must be aware of and have in ther possession medical evidence to warrant SMC.

I wonder if they definitely had it in your case and simply ignored it.

Did you receive SSDI during the older claim? and could the SSA records reveal need for A & A or HB?

In my case the FTCA was resolved in July 1997 and I sent the RO my settlement papers as proof of the 1151 claim.

They actually denied again- can you believe it? Proof of malpractice causing death from the highest lawyers in the VA.

I got on the horn with the OGC real fast. I got my 1151 award very soon after that- but still NO SMC consideration at all.

My long point here is my CUE raises this fact.

The VA had in their possession whether at the VA Central, or the OIG, evidence that warranted a SMC statement in their numerous past denials as well as the award letters.

Is there some documented records somewhere at VA (Voc Rehab) or any therapy treatments that might not be in your regular med rec file (Possible too)

that was in VA's "possession" at that time but yet had not made it into your formal med rec file?

My husband's final PTSD therapy records, as well as his hypnosis records and numerous psychological tests he had to separate his PTSD from his CVA (they were both 100%)

were NOT in his regular VA Med Rec file.

I had to ask his VA shrink for copies of them to submit and the shrink wrote a letter to them too.

They were crucial and I am glad I went to see his shrink after he died.

His other VA shrink documented nothing because he was VA employee shrink (my husband was VA employee) and this doc didnt trust documenting anything employees told him.

My long point here is that as long as evidence is in the VA's possession-it could be somewhere other than the actual med rec files or C file and even not in the specific VARO as in my FTCA case but finding where it is and then telling them that -could help.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use