Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Getting Dea Started... Should Be Simple, Right?

Rate this question


hedgey

Question

When I got my decision papers for my 100%, they said that my college student kid was eligible for DEA going back to the date I was given as my retro date, which was back in 2009. Yay, this will help her pay off her student loans!!

So my kid fills out the DEA application, sends it in. Gets back a letter from DEA saying she must fill out a very short form, choosing the date from which to begin receiving DEA benefits. The letter clearly states that the choices are between the 2009 date and the date I was notified of my 100% rating (December 2010). Naturally, she chooses the 2009 date to get the retro. She also has taken the letter to her college VA representative, to have them fill out & send in the VA form 1999 (certification of attendance or whatever).

So far so good, right?

Yesterday she gets a letter from the VA saying (italics mine):

"By law, VA can't pay for training you received before you became eligible for benefits. Since you became eligible for benefits on November 22, 2010 (where did this date come from???) we can pay you starting on that date. However, we can pay for the remainder of your training if you return the election sent February 28, 2011. Based on the VA Form 1999 you submitted, we recommend that you choose August 30, 2010 as your begin dated since this was the date you began training."

WTH? Okay, I can see that maybe the college didn't fill out the 1999 right, that they left out her previous year of attendance (she started at this college in fall 2008). So I'm going to call or have her visit the VA rep this week and clarify that. But what the heck is the deal with saying she became eligible on November 2010???

The really funny thing is that the letter she got stating her eligibility began in 2009 and this letter saying Nov 2010 is "signed" by the same person....

Along with this new letter was the VA Form 4107, telling her about her right to appeal. Why the heck should she have to go through the appeal process when this is such a clear bungle?

I'm so mad I could spit nails. I really feel like this is almost intentional, because her first reaction was "Rats, that stinks... oh well..." She doesn't know any better, and would just let it drop.

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks Berta!

Not only do you edify me, you make me feel better :)

Still haven't heard back from the FAO. I'm getting anxious about this - I hate calling people and asking for things. I know this was her mistake to correct, but I still feel like I'm going begging. argh!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I do remember getting G.I. Bill going was not that hard. Why DEA should be such a chore I don't understand except I know it can be. It seems the school did most of the work for me back in the dawn of time when I went to school under the Bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Update!

My daughter came home for spring break yesterday afternoon and in the mail was a check for her, for the period from November 2010 to 03/31/2011. Having that big check with her name on it made her head swim and she had no trouble getting up the courage to call the DEA department. Still, she was nervous when she actually got on the phone with them...

The first woman she spoke with was very patient & kind, and after hearing the story put DD on hold to get a case manager involved.

The case manager came on and told my daughter that she had the "choice letter" in front of her, and that she could clearly see that the eligibility date was back in 2009, and that is what DD had selected. So my daughter had definitely satisfied the VA's requirements, and she would be getting the retro payments back to 2009.... but they still needed the Financial Aid Officer in the school to submit corrected dates of attendance.

My daughter asked what she could do if the FAO balked (the woman still hasn't returned my calls since Monday morning last week - me being a PIA mother).

The VA-DEA case manager said that everybody has a boss, and if this woman won't get off her duff & fix this pronto, DD should go over her head. If the school won't make sure it gets done, call her back and the VA will get involved. Surely the lil' ol' school doesn't want to have the VA doing an audit or review of their treatment of Vets & Dependents!! (the case manager was a southern lady).

So my Dear Daughter is relieved and feels pleased that she handled actually dealing with the VA and survived. (I didn't realize how much she'd been paying attention to my own laments). Now she's faced with fighting with the Director of Financial Aid.... I did mention that the FAO who messed up in the first place is also the Director, didn't I? Small school, lots of staff wear lots of hats.

I know this woman is busy, but she's going to get motivated in a hurry if she doesn't fix this for my kid. She's the one who caused all the confusion to begin with, and the stress and distress I've suffered from it lies squarely at her door.

Hmmmph!

And hurray for the VA DEA for treating my daughter, their customer, with courtesy and respect. I think I'll send a kudos IRIS.

Thanks, everyone, so MUCH for all the help and support you've given me through this!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is great Hedgey.

I had problems on my school's end in getting a statement of my paid tuition too.

I can relate this this:

"he VA-DEA case manager said that everybody has a boss, and if this woman won't get off her duff & fix this pronto, DD should go over her head."

First the school financial officer emailed me that the VA does not pay DEA retro and when I emailed her the regulation ,she sat on my request for many weeks until I contacted someone else in their FAO office.

At first that person gave me a hard time-too about the DEA regs-said I was reading them wrong- HUH? I had graduated with Honors, and earned both Mil Studies Certificate at same time I pursued my degree so I said to the woman I would not be using my college experience properly if I accepted what she said and that I would promptly contact the Dean. Bingo they sent the proper info to the VA,emailed me right away that they had sent it, and my check arrived shortly thereafter.

It is difficult,after the years I spent studying under professors who were mostly active Military officers,at this school (and the years of VA BS too) for me to accept any kind of unfounded crap without promptly fighting back.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Vetslady, Berta!

Yep, I think there's going to have to be some chain rattling. If she has to, DD can go to talk to the chairman of the department in which she's majoring. That nice professor happens to be married to the president of the college. I'm sure a phone call from her will be motivational.

It just torques me to think the Director of Financial Aid is so careless about a student's needs (and a Vet's). We're talking about more than 12 months of DEA full-time payments, and that would make a huge dent in my daughter's student loans.

I know it's a busy, busy season for FA people, with new students & parents looking for aid for next fall. I think I'd be more patient and forgiving if the woman didn't allow a tone of irritation enter her voice when she saw she would have to make corrections. And if she would return my calls.

Rambling now... sorry!

Let us be kind, one to another, for we are each of us together in our pain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use