Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Rockford Woman Pleads Guilty To Illegally Obtaining A Veteran's Pension


carlie

Recommended Posts

Rockford Woman Pleads Guilty to Illegally Obtaining a Veteran's Pension

"ROCKFORD (WIFR) -- Jeannine Snider, 66, of Rockford pled guilty today in federal court to making a materially false statement on a VA pension form.

The VA provides pension benefits to certain eligible veterans of the armed forces of the United States and their surviving spouses. VA pensions are need based and are designed to increase the veteran's, or the veteran's surviving spouse's, total income to a level established by Congress.

In the plea agreement filed today, Snider admitted that she applied for a VA pension after the death of a former Rockford resident who had served in the United States Army. The veteran died on May 16, 2000. In the plea agreement, Snider admitted that on a VA pension application form, she falsely stated that she had married the veteran on October 1, 1986, in Tijuana, Mexico.

As Snider acknowledged in the plea agreement, she was never legally married to the veteran.

Snider also admitted that she made false statements to the VA about her income and employment status. The false statements Snider admitted include: (1) a January 28, 2001, VA form on which Snider stated she was not currently working and that she had not worked during 2001, when in fact she was employed by a women's shelter in Rockford during January of 2001; (2) a January 25, 2004, VA form on which Snider stated that she earned no wages from employment during 2003, when in fact Snider was employed by a home health agency in 2003; and (3) a January 4, 2007, VA form on which Snider stated that she earned no wages from employment during 2006, when in fact Snider was employed by two home health agencies during 2006. Snider further admitted that from September 1, 2000, through March 31, 2007, she received a total of $43,143 in VA pension benefits.

The charge to which Snider pled guilty carries a maximum potential sentence of up to 5 years in prison without parole, a term of supervised release following imprisonment of up to three years, and a fine of up to $250,000, as well as any restitution ordered by the court. The actual sentence will be determined by the United States District Court, guided by the United States Sentencing Guidelines. United States District Judge Frederick J. Kapala has set Snider's sentencing hearing for July 7, 2011, at 2:30 p.m."

http://www.wifr.com/news/headlines/Rockford_Woman_Pleads_Guilty_to_Illegally_Obtaining_a_Veterans_Pension_119351584.html?ref=584

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

You bet!!!!

I was contacted by 4 "widows" in the last few years who,in my opinion, were trying to scam the VA.

I even had to contact the CAVC in regard to one situation.

If one reads the investigations at the VA Office of Inspector General web site-there are some interesting stories there of how low some will go to collect benefits that they have not earned or do not deserve.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their is a thief under every rock.

Yes John; maybe Waco RO reads this too. A bit different, but still thieving. Glad Rockford was caught.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use