Jump to content
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Papa

Nehmer Help Please

Question

Is DMII considered a Nehmer case? I disagreed with the effective date of my DMII, and submitted a NOD. But, was told that this was not a Nehmer issue. Also, some one told me that the VA will only go back 5 years for Parkinsons, is that true? If so, why would the doctor ask me how long have I been shaking and having this problem. Wife told him since 1971. I don't expect to have an effective date of 1971, but it sure would be nice :rolleyes: .

Papa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Retroactive payments under Nehmer are explained here:

and also at the NVLSP web site under a search for Retroactive awards under Nehmer.

The retro dates for the 3 new presumptives are explained in the NVLSP Nehmer Training letter which should be found in this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

This BVA case explains the retro involved in a diabetes claim:

It is shorter explanation than within the links I posted.

The veteran met the criteria for AO exposure.He had appealed the EED.

In Part:

"While the medical evidence of record reflects a diagnosis of

diabetes mellitus Type II in 2001, and that, as noted, the

Veteran served in Vietnam during the applicable periods, the

evidence of record does not reflect that the Veteran filed a

claim of service connection for diabetes mellitus Type II prior

to May 8, 2001. In order for the retroactive provisions to be

applied, the Veteran must have communicated an intent to claim

service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus between May 3,

1989 and May 8, 2001. There is no communication from the Veteran

prior to January 24, 2006, that may be reasonably construed as a

claim of service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus; nor

does the Veteran state that a claim was filed prior to such date.

38 C.F.R. §§ 3.151(a), 3.155(a). As the Veteran had not filed a

claim prior to May 8, 2001, the retroactive provisions do not

apply to the Veteran's service connection claim for Type II

diabetes mellitus."

http://www.va.gov/vetapp10/files4/1036312.txt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • Military Service Records - Military personnel records can include DD 214s/Separation Documents, service personnel records found within the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), and medical Records. Military personnel records can be used for proving military service or as a valuable tool in genealogical research.
      • 0 replies
    • So I've been in a basic power chair (Q6 Edge) since 2015. Late 2016 was also fitted for a TiLite TRA manual (also keeping powerchair). 2017 was approved by Tampa VA for clothing allowance for lower. 

       

      Moved to Battle Creek VA late 2017. Since then was issued new basic powerchair (Quickie P222-SE) to replace broken Q6. Still use TiLite also now can lightly ambulate with Forearm crutches.

      Use crutches 50%, and both chairs 25% each.

      Was approved for 1 clothing allowance this year for forearms crutches for upper.

       

      Was denied 2nd for chair/lower that was awarded last year because Chief Prosthetic states "powerchair takes precedence, you were issued that so you are to use only the powerchair".

      Also powerchair has gap between seat and leg mounts where clothes do get caught and tear. Clinician was I'll put it back in but"power chairs dont get clothing allowances", and "any review or appeal will only come back to me"

      I was approved for powerchair/custom manual combo clothing allowance last year; How do I word an appeal for the lower clothing allowance this year?

      My local DAV rep at the VA has no clue on how to handle this.

       
      • 6 replies
    • Thank you.  I’m not exactly sure of how I will file it.  If it is secondary to TBI, would it be pyramiding?
    • I understand what you are saying. Does it sometimes take awhile to update the VA letters and disabilities info online after it closes.....in my case on a Saturday ? Some on other posts on here says no and some say yes so I'm just curious about the inconsistency regarding that if it is yes and no.
    • I understand what you are saying. Does it sometimes take awhile to update the VA letters and disabilities info online after it closes.....in my case on a Saturday ? Some on other posts on here says no and some say yes so I'm just curious about the inconsistency regarding that if it is yes and no.
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines