Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

Top 10 VA Disability Claims Articles

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

A Simple Math Question....i Think

Rate this question

crawsfire

Asked by crawsfire,

 Share

Question

crawsfire Apprentice

crawsfire

Posted
Posted

So I previously posted that the Va in its infinite wisdom granted my spouse CH. 35 benefits with a retro starting date. The letter says "Based on Legislative changes on DEA requirements, we determined you are eligible to receive DEA benefits effective April 26, 2001, your date of marriage to the Veteran. You have 10 years or until April 16, 2011 to receive DEA benefits."

I'm I missing something or are they cutting short her benefits by 10 days? Shouldn't her eligibility end on Apr. 26 2011? It matters because she in school full time this quarter so she would be losing $300.00. Should I file a NOD? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

My suggestion would be before you file a NOD, have her contact VA Education Dept. and ask if it was a typo and see what the answer might be. It could be something very simple like that and then you can go from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
crawsfire Apprentice

crawsfire

Posted
  • Author
Posted

My suggestion would be before you file a NOD, have her contact VA Education Dept. and ask if it was a typo and see what the answer might be. It could be something very simple like that and then you can go from there.

Ok, I guess i could do that. The last time I called I was on hold for two hours just to get an I don't know response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • HadIt.com Elder
Philip Rogers Grand Master

Philip Rogers

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted (edited)

Technically, I believe it should be midnight April 25, 2011. I'd just drop them a note requesting a correction of the date, which would probably be $270. That's something they can correct quickly. Happy anniversary, Tuesday! jmo

pr

So I previously posted that the Va in its infinite wisdom granted my spouse CH. 35 benefits with a retro starting date. The letter says "Based on Legislative changes on DEA requirements, we determined you are eligible to receive DEA benefits effective April 26, 2001, your date of marriage to the Veteran. You have 10 years or until April 16, 2011 to receive DEA benefits."

I'm I missing something or are they cutting short her benefits by 10 days? Shouldn't her eligibility end on Apr. 26 2011? It matters because she in school full time this quarter so she would be losing $300.00. Should I file a NOD? Thanks.

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites
sharon Veteran

sharon

Posted
Posted

Request a waiver so that your wife is able to complete her education if she has not used all of her alloted months. They are routinely granted.

"Don't give up. Don't ever give up." Jimmy V

Link to comment
Share on other sites
crawsfire Apprentice

crawsfire

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Request a waiver so that your wife is able to complete her education if she has not used all of her alloted months. They are routinely granted.

Really? That would be great. Is there a specific form I should use or? I think she should be granted an extension because they didn't notify her that she was eligible for benefits until she only had a couple of weeks of eligibilty left. She still has two more quarters of school before she takes her RN exam.

Edited by crawsfire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to question listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vicdamon12
      Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      ArmyTom
      ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      kidva
      kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Apprentice
      kidva
      kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Collaborator
      kidva
      kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator

  • Our picks

    • VA Disability Claims: 5 Game-Changing Precedential Decisions You Need to Know

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Are all military medical records on file at the VA?

      RichardZ posted a topic in How to's on filing a Claim,

      I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
      RichardZ

      Picked By

      RichardZ,
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?

      Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,

      Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
      yellowrose

      Picked By

      yellowrose,

    • Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court

      broncovet posted a post in a topic,

      VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,
    View All
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use

  I accept