Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Cue House Of Mirrors

Rate this question


WYnWn

Question

Hi, (new here)

I was separated from service (USN) in 1979 with MEB ratings of 10% on each knee for injuries incurred while on active duty. Upon application at University of Northern Colorado for educational benefits, I was denied, assigned a new rating of 0% (Sheesh, then why did I have to get out?). There was no physical examination and the rater basically copied verbatim the Pre-Enlistment physical (only injury that had ever occurred was to right knee that was certified as fully healed and qualified for service) with no referrence or apparent consideration of medical records. During almost five years, my medical record documented new injuries to each knee.

During the same year (1979), I filed a letter of disagreement, but was told quite emphatically (my being female) that I needn't bother. I recently refiled under CUE regulations. The VA concurred on the CUE on the left, set the effective date as 1979, but stayed with the 0% rating, and despite clear evidence in med. records, denied the right knee as pre-existing despite injury dates and treatment info in record, concentrating to the exclusion of other info, on a single part of the total diagnosis. I appealed both. The next "decision" confirmed 'service related', restored 10% rating, not for the documented injuries, but for aggravation of a condition that never existed prior to injury, but changing the effective date to the date of the recent VA exam. This decision effectively takes away 31 years of denied eligability for benefits, while preserving the VA's right to be 'paid back' for their separation award of $6000 (apprx), so my "benefits" would not effectively begin until November of 2014.

No decision as of yet on re-injury of right knee appeal.

I am working with a VA rep, (Tx. Senator's Office not VA employed).

I would appreciate any suggestion, information that any of you can offer.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

A friend sent me a cartoon once, with my name inked in underneath. It was a picture of a crane, mouth open, with the frog's head and arms still visible poking out of the bird's mouth. The frog had both hands firmly planted around the crane's neck. Along the top it said: Never Give Up. I believe it.

What happened with the 10% down to 0% was a lazy, or incompetent, or, (surely, I jest) malicious VA employee who probably laughed as he inked in stolen verbage from my pre-enlistment physical stating I'd had a satisfactory recovery from a 1973 surgery to my right knee and that I was qualified for service and presented it as his own words, representing such 1973 information to be valid in 1979, without the intervening years, four of which were problem free, and two frought with mulitple problems directly resulting from two injuries to the right knee while on active duty and documented in clinical records. The 10% down to 0% for the left knee was because of a fabricated condition that had never before existed, but somehow magically appeared just for the purpose of his denial of my claim. (This has been corrected with CUE, but then watered down to nothing again because they changed the effective date to 2011.......and we've accused them of not being efficient!) Never mind that no physical examination was conducted to support such erudite and clever decisions. (Ahhhhh, to live in magic land.) He literally copied the reasons qualifying me for service, and stated them as reasons for denial of the educational benefits I had applied for, simultaneously wiping out the MEB/PEB, medical record history, and all the years between 1973 and 1979. In one fell swoop the VA wiped out not only 20% disability, but, effectively, service connection as well.

When I was no longer required to walk from the parking area to the ferry or launch, then all the way across Ford Island to the sub. trg. ctr., having to stand all day to teach, and descend two levels of stairs as gravity took control of the coffee I consumed, and then reversing the trek to go home, I experienced a little bit of respite from previous complications. Unfortunately, it was short lived. When work demands increased, complications also increased, and have continued to do so for three decades. But, VA says my life didn't continue after 1979 because they have no evidence of it, and of course, they have no evidence because they severed the relationship. And now, here I am at their door, waving a black flag with shining skull and crossed bones, and growling, "Argggggggggggg".

Yes, I have noticed in this journey a frequent need to consult both medical and legal dictionaries, and realize I am not fluent in either language. And it is a language, that if you are not up to speed on, failure is likely lurking around the next corner, which is why I brought my question concerning legal representation to this forum.

Maybe I should start a little contest here to help me with my quest. Please answer the following questions:

My attorney is the best because_________________________________________________________.

And, please include contact information.

Thanks, I really do appreciate your input.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Wyn,,, I think that Bergman and Moore (877-838-2889)are doing very well here for our Vets and come highly recommneded. You also have some Vets here that have used Katrina Eagle(202-299-1070) and Ken Carpenter( 785-357-5251). My attorney is Jill Mitchell from Heard and Smith(800-584-3700) in San Antonio. I would feel comfortable with any of these. I hope some others will also give you some recommendations. I would also feel more comfortable having legal help now that you legally can with the law change in 2007. Thank you for your service and NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I just found out via my lawyer's assistant that my CUE was remanded back to the BVA from the Court due to the BVA using the wrong law in part of their decision to deny. I have to wait for details. They are playing ping pong with my claim. This is another good reason to hire a lawyer. If the BVA uses the wrong law to decide a case then you really need expert help since they are no experts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've sent out emails and left voice messages today. So, now it's Tag, You're It.

What does this move do to your time in limbo, John?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't know. My lawyer is hoping that the BVA will have a change of heart since they have already been slapped on the wrist by the court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I agree with CC...he has listed some big name Vets attorneys. Ken Carpenter, and Katrina Eagle are very well known. You see Ken Carpenters cases all the time. Katrina is/was the president of NVLSP. B and M has a good reputation among Vets, too. Doug Rosinski won a 22 million dollar lawsuit for Vets.

I have emailed Jill Mitchell..if its the same one. She used to be in Cinci..she may have moved.

My experience is that you cant get those big names. They are so busy they may not even be taking cases. While there are thousands of social security law firms, its almost hard to find a Vet lawyer, unless you go out of state.

Being a Vet lawyer is not all that lucrative, so lots of law firms either do it pro bono, or dont do it at all. How would you like it to wait five years to get paid? Oh..yea, I forgot. Since you are a Vet, you are used to it. Vets are the only ones I know who will wait five years or more to get paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use