Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Talked To Va Service Officer

Rate this question


Flatbroke

Question

Went today and talked to the VA Service Officer at Fort Wood and she ran up my percentages and came up with 94.

She looked over the latest SOC that I got and said that I needed to get the ratings for the PN on both feet raised to 20% since I am having troboule with both feet and then I would be over 95% and then 100%P&T.

In the mean time said to file for IU and helped me with the forms.

I dont think the VA knows or relizes that I have not worked since Oct last year, but will when I send in the forms and a copy of the approval from SSD saying I was eligable since Oct 26, 2010

Ready for the next round.

Kilo 4/12 VIET NAM
11/67-11/68 (TET)
HQ 1/10 LeJune
68
C 1/10 LeJune
68-69
HQ Marine Security Guard School
69
Great Lakes Brig - Corrections
11/69 - 3/70
Semper Fi Everything stays the same until it changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Flatbroke,

Keep up tthe good fight.

Papa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Went today and talked to the VA Service Officer at Fort Wood and she ran up my percentages and came up with 94.

She looked over the latest SOC that I got and said that I needed to get the ratings for the PN on both feet raised to 20% since I am having troboule with both feet and then I would be over 95% and then 100%P&T.

In the mean time said to file for IU and helped me with the forms.

I dont think the VA knows or relizes that I have not worked since Oct last year, but will when I send in the forms and a copy of the approval from SSD saying I was eligable since Oct 26, 2010

Ready for the next round.

This brings up an interesting question..... If a person has been TDIU for say, 18 years, under PTSD, with a total combined rating of 90%, what happens when that person gets additional ratings that would put the combined rating at 100%? Do they "lose" the TDIU, so that SMC can't be awarded for the 100% plus 50% or 60%? Do they now "just" become 100% combined?

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That I dont know. Berta, Carlie ar one of the others that have been here for a while and have the knowledge can answer you. I just need to get the 100% P&T so that the benifits can start.

This brings up an interesting question..... If a person has been TDIU for say, 18 years, under PTSD, with a total combined rating of 90%, what happens when that person gets additional ratings that would put the combined rating at 100%? Do they "lose" the TDIU, so that SMC can't be awarded for the 100% plus 50% or 60%? Do they now "just" become 100% combined?

Kilo 4/12 VIET NAM
11/67-11/68 (TET)
HQ 1/10 LeJune
68
C 1/10 LeJune
68-69
HQ Marine Security Guard School
69
Great Lakes Brig - Corrections
11/69 - 3/70
Semper Fi Everything stays the same until it changes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Wac

I am at 90% and I got the SMC "S". I wonder the same thing since If I got up to actual 100% would I lose "S"? I don't know the answer either. I was 80% IU and got an extra 60% and got the "S". I am 90% schedular. I won't be asking for any increases I don't think except my CUE. However, if I got the CUE that might also make me retro for "S" back many years. If you are 90% you have to get an extra 50% to get to 95% and thus to 100% schedular. You see how hard it is to get there? Your question is a good one. When I got "S" is was result of a CUE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wac

I am at 90% and I got the SMC "S". I wonder the same thing since If I got up to actual 100% would I lose "S"? I don't know the answer either. I was 80% IU and got an extra 60% and got the "S". I am 90% schedular. I won't be asking for any increases I don't think except my CUE. However, if I got the CUE that might also make me retro for "S" back many years. If you are 90% you have to get an extra 50% to get to 95% and thus to 100% schedular. You see how hard it is to get there? Your question is a good one. When I got "S" is was result of a CUE.

After reading Flatbroke's post, it got me thinking. There have been a number of Vets who were 100% TDIU, then ended up with an increase in rating on one or more of their disabilities, giving them a combined 100%. Does that negate the TDIU, or does the Vet retain his/her TDIU? If, in addition to the TDIU (for one single disability), you have additional disabilities that add up to the 50% or 60%, you're eligible for SMC. I wonder how many Vets have been cheated out of SMC by the VA making his/her TDIU into a combined 100%? Many Vets who are receiving compensation, know NOTHING about SMC, and thus would never realize they were ripped off!

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

WAC

There are many vets who are eligible for "S" right now who are not getting it because they don't read Hadit. I do suspect the VA may bump up vets on TDIU to 100% to avoid "S". You have to be total plus 60% so if you get bumped to 100% you need an extra 60%. If I did not file claim for "S" I never would have gotten it even though I am not supposed to have had to file for it. This would be a good question to ask VA lawyer. Once you get "S" I don't think they can take it away easily even if you go from 90% TDIU to 100% schedular, but this is still a good question that should have legal, techical answer. I am going on gut feeling about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use