Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

From War Zones To Jail: Veteran Reintegration Problems

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Subject: [VeteranIssues] From War Zones to Jail: Veteran Reintegration ProblemsDate: Jun 4, 2011 10:29 AM

http://www.cjcj.org/files/From_war.pdf

Long article, study

The article’s Abstract states:

When individuals return home from war they are not the same individuals who left for

war. The Iraq and Afghanistan wars have been on-going since October 2001, and nearly two

million service members have been deployed to these wars – many have been deployed multiple

times. When military personnel return from war, and are discharged from military service, they

are issued the label of veteran. Initially, this term has little meaning or significance to

individuals recently released from military service. As they begin their process of reintegrating

back into the civilian culture the term veteran begins to develop meaning for many veterans.

That meaning is influenced by factors such as interpersonal relationships, education, and

employment/unemployment experiences. Depending upon the level of influence that the Military

Total Institution has had on the veteran, which includes the veteran’s combat experiences, many

veterans find themselves confronted with mental health issues, particularly posttraumatic stress

disorder (PTSD), which is an artifact of her or his combat experiences. A significant number of

veterans with PTSD symptoms have turned to alcohol as a form of self-medication. Many

veterans with PTSD say that alcohol reduces nightmares and difficulties initiating and

maintaining sleep (DIMS). In many instances the experiences of war, PTSD, alcohol, combined

with lethargic civilian attitudes of the problems veterans confront provides the ingredients of a

recipe designed to accelerate the probability of increased veteran incarceration. This article

addresses the aforementioned issues by analyzing the data collected during a study of 162 Iraq

and Afghanistan veterans during a 15-month period, and spanning across 16 states. The data

strongly suggest that veterans with PTSD and alcohol use/dependency issues related to combat

increase the probability of veteran criminal justice entanglements.

A few para’s extracted

Nine to 60 months after demobilization many veterans began to go through changes.

They notice - often for the first time - growing apathy, alienation, depression, mistrust,

cynicism, and expectation of betrayal, as well as difficulty in concentrating, insomnia,

restlessness, nightmares, up rootedness, and impatience with almost any situation or

relationship

nearly all participants who went to the VA for mental health issues expressed dismay

and disgust at the services and treatment they received.

the Institute of Medicine noted:

In going around the country, the committee gathered qualitative data. It heard the

same problems repeated on the West Coast and the East Coast, in the North and

South, by health care providers, by active duty service men and women, and by

veterans: there are not enough mental health providers to meet the demand, case

managers and providers are overwhelmed, wait times are too long for

appointments and between appointments for those in need of mental health and

other services, confidentiality and stigma associated with seeking care for mental

illness is a significant concern of active duty service members, job training and

loss of jobs due to multiple deployments are issues, the ability to diagnose and

treat traumatic brain injuries is a problem, and medical care for National Guard

and reserve forces is an issue as they transition between active duty and civilian

life (Institute of Medicine, 2010: xiii

__._,_.___"Keep on, Keepin' on"

Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"

See my web site at:

http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/

http://www.facebook.com/dan.cedusky

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use