Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules
- 0
-
Tell a friend
-
Recent Achievements
-
Our picks
-
Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,
Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL
This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:
Current Diagnosis. (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)
In-Service Event or Aggravation.
Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”-
- 0 replies
Picked By
Tbird, -
-
Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?
Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,
Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability ratingPicked By
yellowrose, -
-
Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court
broncovet posted a post in a topic,
VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.
They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.
This is not true,
Proof:
About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because when they cant work, they can not keep their home. I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason: "Its been too long since military service". This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA. And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time, mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends.
Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly. The VA is broken.
A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals. I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision. All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did.
I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt". Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day? Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Welcome to hadit!
There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not. Try reading this:
https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/
However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.
When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait! Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?" Not once. Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.
However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.
That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot. There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.
Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.
Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344
Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Post in What is the DIC timeline?
broncovet posted an answer to a question,
Good question.
Maybe I can clear it up.
The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more. (my paraphrase).
More here:
Source:
https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/
NOTE: TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY. This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond. If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much.Picked By
Lemuel, -
-
Question
2 Dollar Bill
Just wanted to introduce myself. I was in the Army from '86 to 9/90, when I was chucked out (honorabley) with 5 days notice, a daughter and wife 8 months pregnant, because I injured my knee and both ankles from a 30' fall from an obstacle on the Air assault course in '87. Went 3 years and an overseas tour on a temp profile. Got 10% out of the Army, but that all went back to the Army for years to pay back the $8500 in severance pay I received, which all went to the hospital for the birth of our second daughter. Anyway, I fought with the VA for awhile but they wore me down, I was working full time and going to school full time.
20 some years later, my buddies convinced me to go back to the VA and, after a little prodding from the DAV (I'm a life member), they upped it to 30%. Wow. The thing I'm wondering about is that the VA denied the claims on my ankles from day 1. The initial paperwork on the claim filed in September of 2010 said I was asking for re-evaluation of my knee and an eval of my ankles as injured over time due to my knee. I argued with the first VSO I talked to because I've had the ankle injuries from '87. He told me there was no way the VA would consider that. Well, when I got the decision 2 days ago, the VA states that although I based my claim on my ankles being injured over time due to knee problems, that my ankles were, in fact, injured during the initial fall in '87!!!
This opens up the question: Is there any way the VA would, or could be forced to give me back pay?
Well, I'm rambling on. For the last 20 years, I've suffered thru this, joined the DAV and worked to get the word out to vets and active duty members that the VA is not your friend, no more than the DA. I've worked at Ft. Campbell since '95 and talked to alot of folks coming home and the word seems to out pretty well that you have to cover your butt these days when you get out. I had no such help when I got out and I know alot of you guys didn't either. No matter what your branch of service or where you served, we all wrote a blank check to Uncle Sam when we signed up, but that's no excuse for the way vets are treated by the system.
Best Regards to All,
Bill
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
4
3
2
1
Popular Days
Jun 17
5
Jun 19
3
Jun 21
2
Jun 16
1
Top Posters For This Question
2 Dollar Bill 4 posts
Berta 3 posts
Pete53 2 posts
Notorious Kelly 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 17 2011
5 posts
Jun 19 2011
3 posts
Jun 21 2011
2 posts
Jun 16 2011
1 post
11 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now