Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Guy Wth Big Problem.

Rate this question


kymike

Question

Hello everyone, my name is Mike. I'm a veteran of the first Gulf War. I been coming to this forum for about six months but until now I've never posted anything.

My computer and writing skills are a little rusty and been hesitent to speak up. But these are desperate times for me, so I'm forced to overcome my social anxiety and awkwardness.

I'm pleased to find this forum and all you great vets. Just being amongst you all and knowing somebody out there cares has made a big difference in my attitude.

I'll get to the chase. I'm sure on of you guys can point me in the right direction. I've a history of lower back and SI joint problems going back to GW1 in 1991.

I had a Lumbar fusion L2-S1 on 3/3/10 at VAMC Louisville for my " service connected" degenerative disk disease and HNP. VARO payed my temporary UI.

Everything seemed fine. Before surgury, on 12/30/2009 I filled for an increase for my DDD which was at 40%, and for unemployability,bi-lateral radiculapathy, stenosis,

... basicly residules from my service connected surguries. On 12/21/10 I get a letter from RO saying that they are denying all my secondary claims, unemployability,

and a proposing to reduce my SC from back to 10% because the rater made a mistake when he increase me from 10% back pain/ SI joint pain and recharacterized it as

DDD w/ HNP in june of 2005 without asking for a medical opinion from the C&P doc.

I'm angry, depressed, in severe pain, on Morphine and can't tie my own shoes. So they want to pull this crap now.

I need you guys help sorting this out. I'm hoping that you moderators out there can help me ask the right questions in the appropriate forum.

Thanks in advance. I hope somebody else can't sleep and can clue in on the first steps I need to take to staighten out this mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Sorry, I re-read your post. It appears you already know who input the back issues on the active problems list. This doctor would be key to your claim. I had a similar problem and was service connected by a letter I got

from the department head at a VA hospital. I did not even have a C&P exam. They used the letter from the head of the department that I got. Developing symptoms less that one year afer discharge does show a back issue during the presumptive period. You could seek an opinion that the symptoms during the presumptive were early symptoms of the condition that required surgury in 2006. If you could get this opinion from the Chief of Staff I doubt the VBA would even try to rebut her opinion. I got the head of the department at a VA hospital to write a letter just by walking into the clinic and telling the secretary I needed a report linking my condition to service. i brought one page of my SMR with me. This was enough to get the department head interested and he came out a talked to me. i did not even have an appointment. He wrote a slam dunk letter for servfice connection while a waited.

If it were me I would make a one page document showing a copy of the active problems list from 1996 and a one paragraph statement requesting her help determining if your condition started during the presumptive period.

Here is the bad news. I tried this at two VA hospitals. One department head refused to get involved. The other doctor wrote the slam dunk letter. It saved me from having to pay for an IMO.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderator

Hoppy posted:

I got the head of the department at a VA hospital to write a letter just by walking into the clinic and telling the secretary I needed a report linking my condition to service. i brought one page of my SMR with me.

"He wrote a slam dunk letter for servfice connection while a waited."

end of Hoppy quote.

This is such good advice, that I reposted it in bold, just in case it was missed. Hoppy, by simply "asking for it" in the right way, got his service connection. He had done his homework...taking the SMR with him, and asking the (VA boss) to do it. He pointed out that not all VA bosses will do this, but you can go to another VAMC and see if that VA boss is more sympathetic than the last one.

This is much cheaper than an IMO..probably better, too. While I am not bashing an IMO...I do know that some Vets simply dont have the money for them. So, I would humbly suggest using the "hoppy method" of getting an IMO...go into the VAMC boss' office and ask for your SC letter.

Thanks, Hoppy, for the great post, and great idea. I will add that I did almost the same thing, except that I asked a sympathetic (VA) physician to write one for me, and he did exactly that. The Bible says, "Ask and you shall receive".

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

More details

The letter you get linking your current condition to the military does not have to be a slam dunk. If the letter raises a reasonable possibility that your conditions during the presumptive period and the current condition are related this would required that they schedule a C&P exam. This would put you in a position to argue the claim with a C&P examiner. This is yet another alternative to paying for an IMO. By the way IMO's are hard to write properly. Use the info available on hadit showing the format for an IMO if you choose to get an IMO. We had a retired DRO who used to post on hadit who said he never awarded a claim based on an IMO from aprivate doctor during his entire career working at the VA.

The BVA cases that I have read awarding service connection for back condition show some symptoms in the military and a specific diagnosis that develops prior to the age of 35 or 40. The older you get and the types of work you do post service will be used as evidence showing the post service condition is unrelated to military. The younger you are and the less time between service and the post service onset of continued symptoms will work in your favor.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use