Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Where To File A Cue?

Rate this question


USNDW

Question

Helping a friend file a CUE for a bad rating back in 2005 and am a little confused where to file it.

The RO that has his file now is here in the local area. His original claim was processed by a VARO a couple of states away, and they are the ones who made the error (we think) in the original decision. He never filed an appeal from the claim and after his claim was complete the VARO sent the file back here to the local VARO. I think maybe they were too busy here and farmed it out because I know a couple of Veterans in this area who had their claims processed at the same VARO a couple of states away.

Any help in recommending where to file would be great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

I think it should be at the local VARO. I have heard that CUE claims need to be filed at the AOJ (Agency of Original Jurisdiction) but since the claim was farmed out I think it must be filed at the same level. If the local VARO choose to farm it out again, that will be their decision. Keep in mind that since this decision was farmed out the local VARO may not farm it out again and just give it a rubber stamp denial and force it to go to BVA for a decision. Remember the CUE claim guidelines and be specific, make sure there is a CUE before filing.

Edited by pete992
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you need any help that would add fuel to the fire there are some members here that are quite experienced with CUE's.

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, I appreciate that.

We are still in the development stage (which will be much shorter than the VA Development stage) but based on the award letter, and the medical records that covered the conditions it is pretty clear that a serious error occurred. The only thing I need to wait for is a copy of the C&P exam, which the Veteran does not remember where it was, to see if there was anything negative from the examiner, but again the reason for the decision, the 10% bilateral, clearly states a DVT in each limb, remarked on the year that both happened and that there was edema (thrombophlebitis) in both limbs, so how on the hell they got 10% after writing that, who knows??

I will be looking for more help and Carlie has already given me invaluable advice.

I really appreciate your help because this Veteran really got hosed, and I almost think that if he had another pulmonary embolism anytime soon his family would not get jack squat because the condition that he is rated for now would not be considered to be the cause of death.

Never have I seen 2 legs on one person that looked so dissimilar, I am talking 2x the size of the other limb.

Can varicose veins be rated separately from THROMBOPHLEBITIS or Phlebitis??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, he's got a 30% for hiatal hernia (GERD)

They denied a couple of his claims and he never appealed. I wasn't here when he separated and only over the past 2 months have we been discussing his rating. He has to get scheduled for a GWI exam. They are supposed to get back to him this week on that. He had his initial VA exam to begin health care just recently also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You have to file at the level where the CUE was made. If it was made at the VARO level that is where you file it. You know when you file a CUE there is no VCAA or benefit of doubt. If a lot of money is involved the VARO probably will deny it. They just let you send it to the BVA and the BVA lets you appeal to the Court. Your pal should get a lawyer who believes in his claim because it will be a long ride if it involves lots of potential retro. That is my experience. The VA will find any reason to deny these claims. Hell, they don't even need a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use