Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro

Rate this question


Chu Lai69

Question

Question: Lets say the DRO rules/decides in your favor for your appeal. Does the DRO rate it or does it have to go on to a rater? Thanks in advance, Chu

Edited by Chu Lai69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

If the Decision Review Officer (DRO) overturns an earlier Rating Decision, the DRO will issue a Decision Review Officer Decision with evaluations and effective dates for the overturned items. The DRO Decision looks identical to a standard Rating Decision, with the exception that "Decision Review Officer Decision" appears on page 1.

FWIW, if the veteran disagreed with several items, it's quite possible that a DRO might overturn one or more of the previous decisions yet uphold the previous denials on on others. In that case, the DRO will issue both a DRO Decision as well as a Statement of The Case (SOC) (which continues a denial). In my experience and observations, it's more likely to receive the hard copy SOC before you receive the hard copy DRO Decision because any decision (with award dates, money, etc.) requires a few more desks to rest upon and a few more keystrokes to be done before release to you.

In the above case, there MIGHT be a statement somewhere within the SOC text, somewhat to the effect that " ... other issues claimed will be addressed in a separate decision>"

Was that enough information for you?

Question: Lets say the DRO rules/decides in your favor for your appeal. Does the DRO rate it or does it have to go on to a rater? Thanks in advance, Chu

Interested

causalobserver8@aol.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Decision Review Officer (DRO) overturns an earlier Rating Decision, the DRO will issue a Decision Review Officer Decision with evaluations and effective dates for the overturned items. The DRO Decision looks identical to a standard Rating Decision, with the exception that "Decision Review Officer Decision" appears on page 1.

FWIW, if the veteran disagreed with several items, it's quite possible that a DRO might overturn one or more of the previous decisions yet uphold the previous denials on on others. In that case, the DRO will issue both a DRO Decision as well as a Statement of The Case (SOC) (which continues a denial). In my experience and observations, it's more likely to receive the hard copy SOC before you receive the hard copy DRO Decision because any decision (with award dates, money, etc.) requires a few more desks to rest upon and a few more keystrokes to be done before release to you.

In the above case, there MIGHT be a statement somewhere within the SOC text, somewhat to the effect that " ... other issues claimed will be addressed in a separate decision>"

Was that enough information for you?

What is FWIW?

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Decision Review Officer (DRO) overturns an earlier Rating Decision, the DRO will issue a Decision Review Officer Decision with evaluations and effective dates for the overturned items. The DRO Decision looks identical to a standard Rating Decision, with the exception that "Decision Review Officer Decision" appears on page 1.

FWIW, if the veteran disagreed with several items, it's quite possible that a DRO might overturn one or more of the previous decisions yet uphold the previous denials on on others. In that case, the DRO will issue both a DRO Decision as well as a Statement of The Case (SOC) (which continues a denial). In my experience and observations, it's more likely to receive the hard copy SOC before you receive the hard copy DRO Decision because any decision (with award dates, money, etc.) requires a few more desks to rest upon and a few more keystrokes to be done before release to you.

In the above case, there MIGHT be a statement somewhere within the SOC text, somewhat to the effect that " ... other issues claimed will be addressed in a separate decision>"

Was that enough information for you?

Thats so much Interested!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use