Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question For Nehmer Vets/widows

Rate this question


Berta

Question

If you got the Nehmer letter regarding potential retro there is a good chance ,in most cases , that you can expect retro.

I understand many have even gotten phone calls from VA telling them the retro they can expect.

Have any of you figured out what retro you could expect? The historic rate charts at the VA web site go back to 1977 but are not too easy to find.

I ask because I figured out the lowest possible lowball retro award I could get by using the historic rate charts for vet-spouse -child regarding my IHD claim. I also figured out the highest retro I might attain.

But this is my point.

If I am lucky enough to get a Nehmer phone call-right away I will know if they did it correctly.It will be higher than the lowball retro figure I figured out (based on the lowest SMC rate as accrued )

Then maybe I can appeal it right over the phone :rolleyes:

and get a fast re do. I sure will raise Hell if the amount is wrong (they probably WONT call me)

Although Nehmer only seems to warrant the proper EED, it seems to me any rating issues can be challenged right away, telling the VA they committed a CUE. But I need to think about that more.

Also- a good way VA can skim our money is to forget dependents.I sure hope they are considering in these Nehmer retro awards that-in some cases the children might have turned 18 during the retro period and are dropped as dependents but on the other hand, there could have been births of other dependents (and/or step children added to the family or adopted children in the many long past years that retro AO can involve.)

It can be worth one's while to try to figure out how much your Nehmer award should be.

DUH I should talk. The VA made 2 errors on my stuff years ago and the errors totaled 40 thousand and I didnt even really pick up on the errors.

I did question them long ago but I made the mistake of believing the follow up letter I got from the VA.

They were wrong.

Years after that the RC found the errors and ordered them to pay me.

I feel pretty stupid that I did this. I should have paid more attention to the matter.40 thou is a lot to overlook.

I was so glad to have the claim resolved in 1998 that I didn't seem to even want to think about them again.And I should have really checked their figures right away.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Berta,

I started a topic yesterday and you were kind enough to respond. The question was not well developed, I apologize for that.

The question did pertain to my husband and yes, he did receive a "Nehmer" letter. I thought he did, and not wanting to rely on the memory,

I pulled it from the file and it does state "this case (my husbands) qualifies for a special review based on a possible prior VA benefits claim for one of

the three new presumptive diseases". He was denied sc for his heart and we didn't file an appeal as he had other issues that were primary and he was quite ill from them and not the heart issue.

Fast forward to an EKG done earlier this year he done in the ER at the hospital and we found out he'd had a prior heart attack, a silent attack. He also has Coronary Artery disease, sc for DM2 (AO related), etc. and so on. Ironically, this letter he received asked him to prove he was in RVN.....when he was and its already been established and yes, I notified VA they should take a look at his file as service in RVN has been established.

So, I'm not sure where this will end up. We can access ebenefits however, I found out through a phone call to VARO that the claims affected by Nehmer will not show up on ebenefits (I had wondered why it didn't show up, all of his other items are there)....they said it had something to do with it being part of a class action lawsuit.

So.......I'm told by 1-800 a rating decision is done and was mailed out to us late last week. It should arrive this week or next. We can wait until it arrives. And, hopefully they

got it right .........

Incidentally, they did send him on a slew of exams, and that was prior to this letters arrival. Interesting, eh? All heart related. All of his care has been at the local VAMC except for the hospital stay at a private facility and I notified them where they could obtain all of his updated med recs and brought a copy in to his VA doc after we arrived home for her review and was told "it will become part of his medical file here". I should go down and check. I'll wait until the decision arrives. No, I haven't seen any $ show up in our account - my notes frommy call to VA this morning indicate the 1-800 rep said that any retro awarded will be paid at the beginning Nov. I don't know about that, the retro he received when we won his 100% claim was in the bank before the decision arrived. Are they doing Nehmer differently ?

We shall find out. If its denied, we'll go from there.

If you got the Nehmer letter regarding potential retro there is a good chance ,in most cases , that you can expect retro.

I understand many have even gotten phone calls from VA telling them the retro they can expect.

Have any of you figured out what retro you could expect? The historic rate charts at the VA web site go back to 1977 but are not too easy to find.

I ask because I figured out the lowest possible lowball retro award I could get by using the historic rate charts for vet-spouse -child regarding my IHD claim. I also figured out the highest retro I might attain.

But this is my point.

If I am lucky enough to get a Nehmer phone call-right away I will know if they did it correctly.It will be higher than the lowball retro figure I figured out (based on the lowest SMC rate as accrued )

Then maybe I can appeal it right over the phone :rolleyes:

and get a fast re do. I sure will raise Hell if the amount is wrong (they probably WONT call me)

Although Nehmer only seems to warrant the proper EED, it seems to me any rating issues can be challenged right away, telling the VA they committed a CUE. But I need to think about that more.

Also- a good way VA can skim our money is to forget dependents.I sure hope they are considering in these Nehmer retro awards that-in some cases the children might have turned 18 during the retro period and are dropped as dependents but on the other hand, there could have been births of other dependents (and/or step children added to the family or adopted children in the many long past years that retro AO can involve.)

It can be worth one's while to try to figure out how much your Nehmer award should be.

DUH I should talk. The VA made 2 errors on my stuff years ago and the errors totaled 40 thousand and I didnt even really pick up on the errors.

I did question them long ago but I made the mistake of believing the follow up letter I got from the VA.

They were wrong.

Years after that the RC found the errors and ordered them to pay me.

I feel pretty stupid that I did this. I should have paid more attention to the matter.40 thou is a lot to overlook.

I was so glad to have the claim resolved in 1998 that I didn't seem to even want to think about them again.And I should have really checked their figures right away.

Edited by VetsLady

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The retro might be in the bank before the letter comes.

"Fast forward to an EKG done earlier this year he done in the ER at the hospital and we found out he'd had a prior heart attack, a silent attack. He also has Coronary Artery disease, sc for DM2 (AO related), etc. and so on. Ironically, this letter he"

Had the VA already diagnosed him with CAD? Were they treating him for CAD?

A 'silent' heart attack ,which was fully evident on an EKG done in the VA ER, was my initial piece of evidence when I proved the VA had malpracticed on my husband to the point of causing his death.

Of course not every silent heart attack can be predicted by the VA. And most of them are properly followed up and treated by the VA.They show up on the EKG.

This is why however vets need to understand their med recs and the results of any EKGs etc.

In our case the diagnosis was so vastly different from what it really should have been, and there was no indication at all from the docs that Rod needed follow up care- that it lent to 6 more years of malpractice.

And 6 years of the wrong med for what they said caused his initial collapse-a med which the GC found also had contributed to his death.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The retro might be in the bank before the letter comes.

"Fast forward to an EKG done earlier this year he done in the ER at the hospital and we found out he'd had a prior heart attack, a silent attack. He also has Coronary Artery disease, sc for DM2 (AO related), etc. and so on. Ironically, this letter he"

Had the VA already diagnosed him with CAD? Were they treating him for CAD?

--- He's been treated for CAD from even before he was seen at the VA as a regular patient. He is on several medications and had a series of very high BP readings last year.

--- The EKG that was done was in the ER at a private hospital, we were out of town and an emergency arose, VA authorized him to be taken there. (He had alot of tests and an overnight stay at this hospital, and I had the records sent to our home 1 week later)

--- BP there was in the super high range, they gave him nitro and were the ones who found the he'd had the prior event but could not say when, (age undetermined).

A 'silent' heart attack ,which was fully evident on an EKG done in the VA ER, was my initial piece of evidence when I proved the VA had malpracticed on my husband to the point of causing his death.

--- VA had done a few EKG's, all the way back to his Agent Orange exam, the one where the VA makes you think they are doing you a "huge favor". The exam was done when shortly after he filed his initial exam (like maybe a week), it was not a formal C&P but done by their docs. Although at that time he was not being seen at the VA or treated there, (we had great insurance) he was seen in the private sector until he received sc for the AO issues that gave him a 70% rating and from that point on he saw VA doctors. Not one of them indicated he'd had a silent heart attack. Not one of the EKG result appts we were told he'd had the silent heart attack ........ but, when I pulled the original chart notes on the AO claim and compared them to the EKG he had in March, the AO doctor noted issues that were similar in nature and his rationale for sending to an EKG was "suggestive of cardiomegaly and left ventricular hypertrophy. Chest Xray showed left ventricular hypertrophy and well and he was sent off to EKG dept. I do have that test result someplace. If I can't find it, I'll stop at the FOIA desk and get it.

Of course not every silent heart attack can be predicted by the VA. And most of them are properly followed up and treated by the VA.They show up on the EKG.

---Very true.

This is why however vets need to understand their med recs and the results of any EKGs etc.

In our case the diagnosis was so vastly different from what it really should have been, and there was no indication at all from the docs that Rod needed follow up care- that it lent to 6 more years of malpractice.

And 6 years of the wrong med for what they said caused his initial collapse-a med which the GC found also had contributed to his death.

---Your story is very sad and my heart aches for you. Sharing what happened to you and Rod is a gift you give to every Veteran. Thank you for sharing this.

VetsLady and, Proud to Be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use