Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

My Bva Remand

Rate this question


R2004

Question

I have attached my BVA remand and I am hoping someone can PLEASE help me to explain what this means. I am slowly starting to understand a little about what it might say...I think!!

Anyone that can shed a little light on this and what my next steps would be is a great help.

Thanks in advance.

Brian

Remand page 2.pdf

Remand page 3.pdf

Remand page 4.pdf

Remand page 5.pdf

Remand page 6.pdf

Remand page 7.pdf

Remand page 8.pdf

Remand page 9.pdf

I've waited this long and I'm not giving up....NEVER!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I am confused by what you had posted here previously and what this remand states.

However, maybe I need to read it all again.

I am assuming you have heart disease that you claimed as secondary to or as aggravated by the SC PAT.

But I cant tell here if it is a ratable level and the C & P results fro the C & P exam will reveal more regarding that.

I still feel the medical association between the PAT and the IHD (did I understand that you do have IHD?)

Must be spelled out clearly by a cardio doctor in an IMO.

In my opinion this is the most important statement the BVA ever makes in most of these remands:

"The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and argument on the

matter or matters the Board has remanded. Kutscherouslcy v. West,l2Yet. App.

369 (reee)."

That is when an IMO, if not submitted before, can do wonders.

Something seems missing in this remand. I will read it over again later.

It does infer TDIU might be a potential consideration but that depends on the outcome of this claim before the VA will formally consider that.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add, those SSA records could be critical to your claim and I see the VA has NEVER obtained them-and must do that on remand.

What seems to be missing is this-

my claim was remanded for the opinion of a cardiologist.Because that claim involved IHD.

I tracked where the C & P request went and it came here to Bath VAMC-the very same hospital that malpracticed on my husband's fatal heart disease, DMII and CVA years ago.

Then I found out the posthumous C & P was being performed by a PA.Not an opinion by a cardio doc that BVA had called for.

I dont see in this remand -maybe others do- where a specific cardio opinion was requested.

If the BVA didnt specify a cardio opinion (or even if they did but I dont see it there)

the only way to combat that type of opinion ,if it is negative, is with an IMO.

If they dont specifiy a cardio opinion, you will get a C & P from someone who doesn't have a clue.

I have suggested here before that we ,as claimants, should try to satisfy the remand ourselves.

That is why I ordered a cardio IMO.

As soon as I got the C & P results I knocked that all down medically and sent the rebuttal to the BVA.

They threw out the VA opinion as I had 3 other IMOs that VA had not considered in years.

I took full advantage of my rights on remand to send in more evidence.

I didnt send it to the AMC or my RO of origin because they cant read, I sent everything directly to the BVA once my claim had been transferred there.

If you have no service nexus of your heart disease as separate from the SC PAT,then you need an IMO that states that the SC PAT aggravates the additional NSC heart problems or has contributed to them or- that the PAT rating should be higher than it is.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

x

x

x

I think the BVA did a pretty good job with this remand: they were able to separate and define your heart issues --and providing for another C&P Exam. I did not see the BVA address the issue of "anxiety", wasn't that also part of your claim? I have to read this again.

I do think since you are already service-connected (at 0%) for a specific heart disease or disorder, you will need an IMO to show the complex relationship that exists between the past, present and future disabling conditions. What you will need to show is an intimate relationship between your heart conditions. Seems to me, the VA is trying to show two opposite/separate heart conditions, where you are needing to show complimentary, contributing conditions and causes... am I being clear, or confusing? Anyway, just my humble opinion.

You would also do well as to find a veteran-friendly mental health provider to state that your serviice-connected PAT has caused your anxiety.

I'll read is again ... ~Wings

Edited by Wings

USAF 1980-1986, 70% SC PTSD, 100% TDIU (P&T)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2004 I filed a I filed for VA compensation for 5 conditions (1 being mental health) I submitted all the medical documents with my original claim. In 2005, the VA denied all my claims...surprise. I filed a timely disagreement and asked for more time because I was stationed overseas with my spouse (2003-2010).

Never heard from the VA until we got back to the states in 2010 - I had more problems with the PTSD and depression and sent in “more evidence” Thats when i got a call from the VA remand office. Had to write my congressman to get my VA Claims file...but it was worth it when I found a VA Appeal decision I never even knew about!

The VA Board of Appeals Remanded all my claims to the VA Regional Office (I was never given any C&P exams).

The VA scrambled and sent me on a mental health C & P exam in 2011 (service connecting the mental health issue…Remand office told me the rater looked at it and said “30%) but all the medical issues in the C&P exam were mostly untruths and incorrect information. It was very disturbing to read lies and untruths in the C & P exam…I took a loan out and paid for my own IME, which service connected everything with a timeline, and refuted the VA's.

I sent the IME in with more evidence the VA never even considered. The REMAND office is now saying I will have to go on more C & P exams since my IME refuted the VA C & P exam. This could go back and forth for decades and it's already been almost 10 years!

At this point I'm thinking I need an attorney. Any suggestions on attorneys?

Anybody ever get a rating after sending in an IME that disagrees with the VA's C & P exam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Anybody ever get a rating after sending in an IME that disagrees with the VA's C & P exam"

Yes Many of us here have used IMEs or IMos to refute VA's findings.

You mentioned 'The REMAND office' - where is and who is the remand office?

"The REMAND office is now saying I will have to go on more C & P exams since my IME refuted the VA C & P exam. This could go back and forth for decades and it's already been almost 10 years!"

You stated you claimed 5 conditions.

It seems,in my opinion, they are going to do a C & P for each condition.And that would make sense as I assume you only had a MH C & P so far? But the IME refuted all of the conditions they denied ...?

"Anybody ever get a rating after sending in an IME that disagrees with the VA's C & P exam"

Yes Many of us here have used IMEs or IMos to refute VA's findings.

You mentioned 'The REMAND office' - where is and who is the remand office?

"The REMAND office is now saying I will have to go on more C & P exams since my IME refuted the VA C & P exam. This could go back and forth for decades and it's already been almost 10 years!"

You stated you claimed 5 conditions.

It seems,in my opinion, they are going to do a C & P for each condition.And that would make sense as I assume you only had a MH C & P so far? But the IME refuted all of the conditions they denied ...?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use