Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Polytrauma/pain Clinic Limited Only To Returning Oef/oif Vets?

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

I am 100 percent service connected disabled. I went to my occupational therapy appointment today, which is in the polytrauma/pain, I get several accommodations arranged --wheelchair ramp, shower chair, etc. I am asked if I am a OEF/OIF veteran. No, I answer. They review my record, and say they're are going to call someone. They did. The person explains I am not OEF/OIF --i knew this-- and the terms refers to individuals who were "boots on the grounds"

I am then told that polytrauma is being limited solely to OEF/OIF veterans. I explain that I was in the program before, and that I should be in it now. They agree. But because I am not OEF/OIF I cannot receive treatment.

Please advise.

I mean I am priority group 1 polytrauma is covered in the VA health book. Why the heck does it matter where I was injured at I am still dealing with the 100 percen service connected disabilities, and the treatment in clinic is for service connected disabilities.

What about all the older vets. I was told there is such an influx from the OEF/OIF that they take precedence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

First talk to the 'patient advocate".( which may go nowhere.)

I'd then ask in writing via certified letter to the appropriate VAMC director, and if you don't get satisfaction, to the VA secretary and your congressional representatives.

If they are refusing to provide proper treatment, there are also other options, particularly if failing to provide proper treatment cause your conditions to become more severe.

Refusing to provide proper treatment to a 100% SC'd veteran can cause a lot of waves.

I am 100 percent service connected disabled. I went to my occupational therapy appointment today, which is in the polytrauma/pain, I get several accommodations arranged --wheelchair ramp, shower chair, etc. I am asked if I am a OEF/OIF veteran. No, I answer. They review my record, and say they're are going to call someone. They did. The person explains I am not OEF/OIF --i knew this-- and the terms refers to individuals who were "boots on the grounds"

I am then told that polytrauma is being limited solely to OEF/OIF veterans. I explain that I was in the program before, and that I should be in it now. They agree. But because I am not OEF/OIF I cannot receive treatment.

Please advise.

I mean I am priority group 1 polytrauma is covered in the VA health book. Why the heck does it matter where I was injured at I am still dealing with the 100 percen service connected disabilities, and the treatment in clinic is for service connected disabilities.

What about all the older vets. I was told there is such an influx from the OEF/OIF that they take precedence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You need to appeal this it is a decision and you only have 30 days to do it.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This morning, I received a phone call, and I am going to be given an exception and allowed to continue in the program. BUT an exception isn't the terminology that should be used. I have the right to have my service connected injuries treated at the VA. I am receiving treatment for those injuries at this clinic.

The problem is not limited to me but to every veteran that isn't OEF/OIF. I understand the influx of veterans is straining the medical care, with the law that says that post-deployed veterans get five years of medical care, but their medical care doesn't supersede my medical care. At most they are my equal, in regards to waiting for appointments in a pain clinic.

How can a VAMC legally establish a policy that voids my right to adequate medical treatment?

Hopefully, I can get my final TDRL evaluation done and over with in march and get tricare, and just go private. I don't need to fight over healthcare.

Once the VAMC posts the policy in paper I will post it on this site. It goes into effect in January. I already talked to the Director's assistant, did that yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The local VAMC's just make these rules up and then try and bluff you. It is just about money. My VAMC went over budget and started making cuts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use