Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C&p Repeat?

Rate this question


sbrewer

Question

Just to catch you up to speed, Here's the story and a question...

My husband filed 1151 for his toe which was denied and appealed.. He had a C&P on July 17. The NP that did the C&P said he could see the toe did not bend but could not say it would bend previous to surgery and it would probably be best for myself and our daughter to write a letter stating that it would bend. Well, he was going to wait and get a copy of the C&P to see what the NP wrote before we wrote our letters. Oh and he works at the VA as well, so yesterday 7/19 he gets a call from a dr. so and so who tells him he needs to come back to him for more examinations. So he went and then today he was sent back for another x-ray, which the radiologist said would be better I guess to compare it the the previous two x-rays. One was taken before surgery and one after. Does anyone know what this means?

Thanks,

sbrewer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Guest jstacy

When a VA Radioligist reads an Xray, They use a previous one to compare the new one too. They will write a report like this.

There are changes in whatever to whatever from previous study. Get a copy asap. They are available the next day after the Xray.

Radiologist do not write opinions.

Edited by jstacy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Sbrewer

That sounds good to me. For whatever reason the VA doctors sound like they actually want to help your husband. This is a rare event and I would cooperate 100% while keep you eyes open any tricks the VA may try and pull. The only doc at the VA who ever went out of his way to help me was the guy who did my AO exam. He is no longer there. They got rid of him in a hurry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys,

I just talked to my husband who had his C&P results and the dr. wrote it "was as likely as not" that the surgery caused a hammer toe. He noted that there was no mention of hammer toe before surgery and no mention of it until 4 months after the surgery. I think this is good news, but don't know if it will rate at anything or not. This is the toe next to the big one. Any input would be appreciated...

Thanks,

sbrewer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree- sounds good but how the VA will rate this is very hard to say.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Here's what the rating schedule looks like that pertain to your claim;

5276 Flatfoot, acquired:

Pronounced; marked pronation, extreme tenderness of plantar

surfaces of the feet, marked inward displacement and severe spasm

of the tendo achillis on manipulation, not improved by orthopedic

shoes or appliances:

Bilateral.......................................................................

...................................... 50

Unilateral ................................................................................

.......................... 30

Severe; objective evidence of marked deformity (pronation,

abduction, etc.), pain on manipulation and use accentuated,

indication of swelling on use, characteristic callosities:

Bilateral.......................................................................

...................................... 30

Unilateral......................................................................

..................................... 20

Moderate; weight-bearing line over or medial to great toe, inward

bowing of the tendo achillis, pain on manipulation and use of

the feet, bilateral or unilateral ................................................................................

.. 10

Mild: symptoms relieved by built-up shoe or arch support.............................................. 0

5277 Weak Foot, bilateral:

A symptomatic condition secondary to many constitutional conditions,

characterized by atrophy of the musculature, disturbed circulation,

and weakness:

Rate the underlying condition, minimum rating .................................................... 10

5278 Claw foot (pes cavus), acquired:

Marked contraction of plantar fascia with dropped forefoot, all toes

hammer toes, very painful callosities, marked varus deformity:

Bilateral.......................................................................

...................................... 50

Unilateral......................................................................

..................................... 30

All toes tending to dorsiflexion, limitation of dorsiflexion at ankle

to right angle, shortened plantar fascia, and marked tenderness

under metatarsal heads:

Bilateral.......................................................................

...................................... 30

Unilateral......................................................................

..................................... 20

Great toe dorsiflexed, some limitation of dorsiflexion at ankle,

definite tenderness under metatarsal heads:

Bilateral.......................................................................

...................................... 10

Unilateral......................................................................

..................................... 10

Slight…………………………………………………………………………………0

5279 Metatarsalgia, anterior (Morton’s disease), unilateral, or bilateral....................................... 10

5280 Hallux valgus, unilateral:

Operated with resection of metatarsal head................................................................. 10

Severe, if equivalent to amputation of great toe............................................................ 10

5281 Hallux rigidus, unilateral, severe:

Rate as hallux valgus, severe.

Note: Not to be combined with claw foot ratings.

5282 Hammer toe:

All toes, unilateral without claw foot............................................................................ 10

Single toes............................................................................

........................................ 0

5283 Tarsal, or metatarsal bones, malunion of, or nonunion of:

Severe..........................................................................

.............................................. 30

Moderately severe ................................................................................

..................... 20

Moderate ................................................................................

.................................. 10

Note: With actual loss of use of the foot, rate 40 percent.

5284 Foot injuries, other:

Severe..........................................................................

.............................................. 30

Moderately severe..........................................................................

............................ 20

Moderate ................................................................................

.................................. 10

Note: With actual loss of use of the foot, rate 40 percent.

I hope this helps!

Vike 17

Edited by Vike17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use