Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
  
 Read Disability Claims Articles 
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Mystic W/ Ptsd, From Rape,coerced Abortion, Hurt Back,fibro...more

Rate this question


mysticcherokee usn vet

Question

Hi, Im bewildered by all of this. I feel brain damaged with the ptsd, how do yall remember all of this stuff. I really dont know what Ill do, if they turn me down again. Its been a tough row to hoe, no sht. Im lucky to be alive, because Ive tried the other way, not my time I guess.

Will a congressional oversight help or hurt more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

When I get notice that they will open my claim back up, whats next as far as my duty to assist:

At that time can I send my OTHER drs. letter in, and my smr's, taht I feel are relevant. Tho they havem they obviously haven READ THEN GOSH DARNIT!, so the set hav is more condensed.I took out the common cold, etc, so that just pertinent stuff is in there.

Thoughts, opinions? I tried to access Susans site, but havent had any luck. I really want to go there too, and join. She and I could be kindred spirits for all I read thats similar to my experience, in her Bio. STRONG ADMIRABLE WOMAN! Mystic

The VBA has the "Duty To Assist", not the claimant.

The claimant has the responsibility to submit whatever the VBA requests.

For the VBA to "reopen" a claim - the claimant must submit (the VBA's definition)

of "New and Material" evidence. It can not be duplicative evidence already considered

and it can not merely be "cumulative" evidence - basically the same evidence, but just stated

by a different medical provider.

JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's an example and more info.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp11/Files4/1140390.txt

New evidence means existing evidence not previously submitted to agency decisionmakers. Material evidence means existing evidence that, by itself or when considered with previous evidence of record, relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim. New and material evidence can be neither cumulative nor redundant of the evidence of record at the time of the last prior final denial of the claim sought to be reopened, and must raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claim. 38 C.F.R. § 3.156(a) (2011).

Only evidence presented since the last final denial on any basis (either upon the merits of the case, or upon a previous adjudication that no new and material evidence had been presented), will be evaluated in the context of the entire record. Evans v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 273 (1996).

For the purpose of establishing whether new and material evidence has been submitted, the credibility of the evidence, although not its weight, is to be presumed. Justus v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 510, 513 (1992).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Althought it would appear they refuse to even read my redundant smr's, from the git go, but:

I have a letter to send in thats from a doctor been seeing me about 3 years. I didnt send his letter in with the other two doctors', as he initailly listed just things like orthopedic condition, spinal conditions, then fibromyalgia, no mental.

Heres the thing, when I got the letter they said" if theres any tweeking needs to be done, dont hesitate to ask"..., and I did.

I asked them to name conditons w/out codes of course, and sent the request to reopen claim for appeal without the 3rd letter. When is the best time to send the 3rd REVISED letter in. Thanks! Mystic

Edited by mysticcherokee usn vet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found the case Evans vs....., but could make no sense of it. Im at a disadvatage here, as I dont speak legalese, however I get the impression that I need to learn it, and my brain doesnt work that way. How do folk ever get their scd, if they dont understand case law?! M. shakin my head

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found the case Evans vs....., but could make no sense of it. Im at a disadvatage here, as I dont speak legalese, however I get the impression that I need to learn it, and my brain doesnt work that way. How do folk ever get their scd, if they dont understand case law?! M. shakin my head

I just posted that link for you to see info on N&M evidence - no need to try and study Evans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use