Jump to content

mysticcherokee usn vet

New User Review
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About mysticcherokee usn vet

  • Rank

Previous Fields

  • Service Connected Disability

Recent Profile Visitors

595 profile views
  1. wings dont even bother, just shut the front door, because YOU DONT KNOW ME> you make assumptions, and ya know what they say bout those. Im not talkin to you *itch, get IT! mystic
  2. I thought i was gonna die from blood loss with that last abortion in military FORCED. it didnt seem like she called me a liar. SHE DID. then i showed her examples of cases where SOMEONE ELSE accused Military of forcing abortion, (same time i did my tour) and they were approved for disability.not called liars. I think Wings is a liar. If she REALLY HAD PTSD, she wouldnt have the recall that she practices on here. JMO. She lied and got away with it to the disability folk. Smirk. Mystic
  3. pre-award letter. Hmmmmmm, didnt know there was such a thing, but it sounds major "warm and fuzzy", and deserving of a major CONGRADS!!!! Mystic
  4. EWWW EXCITING!! Ill say a prayer tonight for you. Sincerely, Mystic
  5. X X X Hot-diggety-dog! Awesome! Congradulations! Woo Hoo!!!!! Mystic
  6. Still here, there and everywhere! Woo Hoo! Mystic
  7. Besides Wings claimed that my very contetion of rape and coercion from the military was ludicrous, and accused me of comparing the military to the Gestapo. The last of that is ludicrous and Ive proven my contentions are real and not at all unbelievable, as evidenced in these(rightoff the top) case scenarios.I win,shes a loser,imo. case/Thread closed
  8. Carlie, the denial was for allegies and such. However there were two items noted in the beginning that were approved, and I dont know for sure what they were, but I know what she claims. Nowhere does it state that her claim of rape and coercion to abort were denied or dismissed, remanded or any other thing, so it must have been approved. Mystic
  9. No attack, merely a constitutional right. For the accused to face their accuser. Court of law is good enough for me. Heres yet another claim of forced abortion, and mind you they won. http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp10/Files2/1016362.txt This isnt meant as an assault, truth be told, just countering what I felt was an assault on my honor. You might feel the same in my position, ut since ya dont, nobody is forcing you to read this, with all due respect. Mystic
  10. Very Interesting. Thanks! I cant find 2/3 tho. I watched number one. Mystic
  11. I have been looking at claims and almost immediatly came upon one that mirrors my complaint. Yet Wings you claim that Im accusing our military (ya know the one that a lot of people are saying they got screwed by) of being like NAZIS, in forcing women to get abortions. That YOU represent the entire forum in your opine of my dilemmma.This appellant was in almost exact years I was, and has exact same complaints.:BUT IM A LIAR WINGS. You give yourself to much credit , with sticking your head in the sand ostrich like, and swearing the whole forum is down there in the sand with you. Jeez, can I get a little love here sister friend! Mystic http://www.va.gov/vetapp/wraper_bva.asp?file=/vetapp98/files1/9801361.txt INTRODUCTION The veteran served on active duty from April 1978 to June 1979. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) denied benefits sought, and the veteran appealed. The Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) remanded the case to the RO in March 1995. Thereafter, the RO granted two of the service connection claims which had been remanded, and now increased rating appeals have since been perfected and are currently before the Board for the two disabilities for which the RO granted service connection. CONTENTIONS OF APPELLANT ON APPEAL The veteran contends that she was raped in service, became pregnant, and was forced to have an abortion against her wishes and beliefs, and that as a result, she began abusing alcohol and developed psychiatric problems. Therefore, she asserts, service connection is warranted for a chronic acquired psychiatric disability. The representative maintains that if this claim is not allowed on the basis of in-service incurrence, it must be remanded to the RO to have the RO address the presumption of soundness on service entrance examination. THIS IS A GREAT POST!
  12. Boy youve got THAT RIGHT! LOL! Sorry bout the mess last night. I dont like bein called a liar, but everybody else is presumed to be telling the truth. Makes me feel ostracized, and hurts my feelings. However it was never my intention to have that mess goin.Okay MAN!lol! sincerely, Mystic
  13. OW. That sounds painful! What did ya want to know tho. Mystic
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines