Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C P Exams Saying Caused By Or Result Of Service

Rate this question


walt

Question

Good Morning everyone and Thank you.

My claim has been in decision twice and has been sent back to gathering of evidence.the regional office has asked St.Louis DOD For this."request herbicide exposure documents" I understand they are checking the archives for documents from korean service. I have some questions please.First I have three cp exams with what I think is positive.One is for panic disorder from a va Phychiatrist saying ,"The condition/dissability panic disorder is most likely caused by or a result of military service.

The other two are for copd and high blood pressure,both saying, the condition/dissability" is as likely as not (greater than 50/50 probability} caused by or a result of military service.Am I correct in thinking it is still up to the rater whether I get anything or not?The copd and high blood pressure were written as an addendum at the time I went for the cp exam for the panic disorder.I had a cp exam by the same Dr. that gave these two opinions and he was no help at all on the conditions he examined me for then.

Also these three conditions are three of four I was denied for in 2000.The denial letter stated in the analysis...service connection is denied since the condition neither occurred in nor was caused by service. Yet directly above in the facts paragraph it says...The veteran has submitted evidence showing he was diagnosed with mild copd in 1979(I was in service at that time)Treatment records from va medical center in Murfreesboro Tennessee show he was treated for copd in Feb. 2000. It says basically the same thing for anxiety and high blood pressure.

In the evidence it says...Notice from nprc that they forwarded the veterans service medical records to Montgomery Regional office on August 4 2000 These records have not been received....medical evidence from the veteran....treatment records from va medical center in Murfreesboro TN. for the period of May 26 1992 to May 23,2000. They now have all this plus va records from Two other va medical centers.At the time they did not have two of my four dd 214's.They do now.

Thet stated in denial that if records were subsquently received claim will be reconsidered with date of claim protection. I pointed this out to them in my present claim.I guess they only got these records when I opened this claim.

As to the request from DOD for herbiside exposure...The presumptive date for korea agent orange and herbicide exposure begins1 April 68 and I left there in November 67.However I have a declassified document showing it was tested at nine different locations on 80 acres during Sept.,Oct.,Nov.and I think Dec.1977 I was TDY twice to the DMZ and was stationed six miles south.I have not found out the locations it was tested except The south border tape to civilian control line.Thre have been some granted Service connection for this.I am trying to get all info I can come up with.

I know some of this is repetative of my previous post but I tried to give all I could so you would be able to advise and/or comment. Thank you all very,very much.Too I noticed for first time im my va records..prognosses advanced emphysema.

Walter A. Brazelton SR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

The "rater" makes the decision. It seems from your stated information that you should be successful.

However the VA's error rate is high enough that there is no telling. I'd say that there is at least a 30% chance that you will end up filing an appeal. On the other hand, you may have at least a 50% chance of a favorable decision. I assume that you have already filed for reconsideration, from your remarks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a year ago the VA extended the end date of Korean AO exposure to Aug. 31, 1971 which hopefully has helped some Korean War vets attain SC for AO.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-01-25/html/2011-1342.htm

“Thet stated in denial that if records were subsquently received claim will be reconsidered with date of claim protection. I pointed this out to them in my present claim.I guess they only got these records when I opened this claim. “

Yes that is true.

We have info here on that in topic called “Newly discovered service records.” available under a search here.

VA is firm on the AO Korean reg dates. I dont see here any AO presumptive condition but if the COPD and HBP is in your SMRs, and the panic disorder , as the C & P s do sound favorable for SC, then I don't see need to focus on the AO regs, unless the HBP was first manifestation of Ischemic heart disease,by established medical evidence.

Although VA holds to those dates above, perhaps something will definitely turn up in the search for the herbicide exposure documents that would help you if you in fact have an AO presumptive condition.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About a year ago the VA extended the end date of Korean AO exposure to Aug. 31, 1971 which hopefully has helped some Korean War vets attain SC for AO.

http://www.gpo.gov/f...l/2011-1342.htm

“Thet stated in denial that if records were subsquently received claim will be reconsidered with date of claim protection. I pointed this out to them in my present claim.I guess they only got these records when I opened this claim. “

Yes that is true.

We have info here on that in topic called “Newly discovered service records.” available under a search here.

VA is firm on the AO Korean reg dates. I dont see here any AO presumptive condition but if the COPD and HBP is in your SMRs, and the panic disorder , as the C & P s do sound favorable for SC, then I don't see need to focus on the AO regs, unless the HBP was first manifestation of Ischemic heart disease,by established medical evidence.

Although VA holds to those dates above, perhaps something will definitely turn up in the search for the herbicide exposure documents that would help you if you in fact have an AO presumptive condition.

Thank you Berta.

Walter A. Brazelton SR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "rater" makes the decision. It seems from your stated information that you should be successful.

However the VA's error rate is high enough that there is no telling. I'd say that there is at least a 30% chance that you will end up filing an appeal. On the other hand, you may have at least a 50% chance of a favorable decision. I assume that you have already filed for reconsideration, from your remarks.

Thank you Sir. What I am trying to find out is what Percentage I would get.I have applied for tdiu hoping for it if not 100 %. I reopened this claim when I was denied on the Neimer review.I still do not understand why they did it knowing I was in Korea and not Viet Nam.

Walter A. Brazelton SR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Berta.

Berta I do have prostate cancer.I know the presumptive date is 1 April 68 and I left in November of 67 But agent orange and one or two other herbicides was tested on 80 acres in nine locations in late 67.I believe I was in the covered area.I know there have been some serviced connected for this testing.I was stationed six miles South of Dmz and Tdy to it twice. Just not sure about time frame.Depends on what they find in archives I guess. Thank you very Kindly again.

Walter A. Brazelton SR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walt, what base were you stationed at & unit.

Coot

Edited by cooter

!!!BROKEN ARROW!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use