Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Early Effective Date For Anemia

Rate this question


Reddit

Question

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

In June 2008 VA examiner found that my April 14, 2004 hysterectomy essentially resolved the Veteran's anemia issues and that her condition is in remission.

“STR (Jun1988-March 1993)”

“The treatment notes indicate that I had complaints of headaches and dizziness during this time.”

Was that noted in 2004?

Can you obtain any buddy statements that you suffered from headaches and dizziness prior to the EED they gave you (which seems really not appropriate here at all)

I dont see where the VA considered this at all:

“I was diagnosed with anemia, have been taking iron pills during service. A prescription forFerrous sulfate tablet three times a day 65mg was May 1997”

When did this prescription stop?

I would use this as evidence to warrant a better EED and anything you can obtain such as buddy statements that show, solely due to the anemia you had symptoms of it prior to their EED that warranted a compensable rating.

I am surprised at the way they determined the rating. Did the VA at any point award SC at “0” prior to the EED they gave you?

You asked:

"tell me what do you all think, do I have a chance at winning this"

In the 1990s the Prodigy Vets BBS on line had a former BVA lawyer Bill Smith, who helped anyone he could with advise as to how to handle their VA claim.

He stated many times, that in his experience working for the BVA, he felt 98- to 99% of all claims could succeed.

I would estimate that a little lower myself.

But still I personally have found that Nothing is impossible with the VA. It just takes getting the right evidence.

Often an IMO is the best way to resolve claims like yours but IMos are costly.

Maybe you could get an estimate from an IMO doctor as to your chances here of getting more retro comp and then weigh their fee against the potential retro .

Also have you searched the BVA for similiar cases regarding anemia to see how the vet either succeeded or why they were denied?

Denied cases at the BVA show us a lot as to what was lacking in the specific claims they denied , and what a similiar claim needs to overcome.

By all means continue to try for a better EED.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Berta they did they gave service connect non-compensate. said I was asymaptic and did not mention anything about medication.

C&P exam does not mention anything about anemia. Just said diagnosis Anemia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that info changes my advise.

I was stuck on this from the file downloaded here:

"VARO

Reconsideration for Early Effective date with Compensation

Anemia- Diagnostic Code 7700"

When did you receive the last decision?

You had one year in which to file a formal appeal.

A reconsideration request , as I have advised here many times,

if not granted to the veteran's satisfaction with the one year NOD appeal period ,must have a formal NOD filed ,with proof of mailing to the VARO within the one year NOD time frame, otherwise the VA can say the NOD was not timely filed and that claim would be over.

It appeared to me after I had filed a reconsideration request on a CUE denial, that VA was 'working' to resolve the issue. Until I figured out their bizarre SOCs and denials- with no legal basis at all, were just to string me along until I lost my appeal rights.

I filed my formal NOD within days of the NOD year deadline.

The CUE claim was awarded this past January.

What is the staus of your appeal on this, if the NOD was filed in time?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that info changes my advise. I was stuck on this from the file downloaded here: "VARO Reconsideration for Early Effective date with Compensation Anemia- Diagnostic Code 7700" When did you receive the last decision? You had one year in which to file a formal appeal. A reconsideration request , as I have advised here many times, if not granted to the veteran's satisfaction with the one year NOD appeal period ,must have a formal NOD filed ,with proof of mailing to the VARO within the one year NOD time frame, otherwise the VA can say the NOD was not timely filed and that claim would be over. It appeared to me after I had filed a reconsideration request on a CUE denial, that VA was 'working' to resolve the issue. Until I figured out their bizarre SOCs and denials- with no legal basis at all, were just to string me along until I lost my appeal rights. I filed my formal NOD within days of the NOD year deadline. The CUE claim was awarded this past January. What is the staus of your appeal on this, if the NOD was filed in time?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK THIS IS WHAT HAPPEN BERTHA AND IT MY HELP SOMEONE.

When i filed my claim in 1997 they denied it then, I appeal. It then came back as serivce connected 0 percent, but stated that they did not have records from sep 1993- thru dec1997. said it theses records are located at a later date will reconsider. well, they said they had them and not they say they don't.

was able to track down a medication order for iron tablets for may 1997. and was wonder will that be enough for records not use in first decison.

Reddit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use