Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Space Available Travel - Lobbying For It


Recommended Posts

Dear fellow Veterans:

Today I sent a simple email message to my Congressional Representative George Miller. I'd encourage all Veterans to send a similar message to their Representative to advocate for this Tax neutral benefit for Disabled Veterans. You can copy my message below and adjust it accordingly.

Dear Honorable Miller:

Currently, I'm a Disabled Veteran, being well taken care of by the V.A. in Martinez C.A., and for that I am grateful.

In the next few months, it's likely I will be rated 100% disabled due to respiratory and other challenges. Thankfully, I can still walk and hike in a limited capacity.

With my limitations I can still travel, and recently discovered that Disabled Veterans (especially 100% ratings) are not eligible for Space Available travel on DOD aircraft.

Further, it's my understanding numerous Bills have been introduced to both the Senate and House, and none have survived or passed for signature by my Commander-in-Chief.

As a Citizen, and Disabled Veteran, I'd appreciate your advocating for this important Veterans' benefit which would be a negligible cost to Tax Payers, and a great social and morale booster by enabling Veterans to visit family in our mobile society.

Respectfully yours,

Peter Cxxxxxx

Disabled Veteran

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This fight has been going on for years. The retired military feel it would be taking seats from them, but half the time the planes go out with many emty seats. They are catergory six which is the lowest catergory. This means that they can not have a seat until all 5 catergories before them have a seat. I think they should just make a catergory seven for 100% disabled vet's. This would stop the retired military people that fly space a stop fighting the bills to give disabled vets the right to fly because the retirees would have first shot at the seats then the disabled vets, catergory seven would be no threat to them. Hope this makes sense to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Red,

Make complete sense, and IMHO (no such thing...wink.png ) 100% Disabled Vets served as long, hard and distinguished as 20 year retirees. There must be a way to push for this. Here's my Congressman's response.

May 1, 2012

Mr. Peter I.

Dear Mr. X,

Thank you for contacting me to share your support for space-available flight privileges for retired military service members.

As you know, Space Available Flight is a privilege where military service members, their families, and service retirees are allowed to fill seats on Air Force air transport flights that would otherwise be left empty. The seats are made available on a "space-available" basis and are only done so once all the space-required (duty) passengers and cargo have been accommodated.

Currently, "gray area" retirees (National Guard members or Reservists who are eligible for retirement but under the age of 60) and surviving spouses and their dependents are not eligible for full Space-Available travel.

Legislation is pending in the House of Representatives, The Space-Available Act, H.R. 4164, which would extend full Space Available travel benefits on military aircraft to National Guardsmen, Reservists, "gray area" retirees, and surviving spouses and their dependents, which would allow them to fly with the United States and internationally.

Certainly, given the enormous sacrifices that National Guard Members, reservists, and spouses make in today's modern military, extending Space-A travel to them would be a small, but significant gesture to recognize their efforts in helping to ensure our freedom.

I look forward to reviewing this or similar legislation when it comes before the full House for final consideration. I will certainly keep your support in mind at that time.

Sincerely,

GEORGE MILLER

Member of Congress

P.S. Keep up with the latest news from Washington at GeorgeMiller.house.gov and Facebook.com/RepGeorgeMiller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Ping Jockey,

Rep Miller did not even mention disabled veterans in his answer back to you. It looks like he wants everyone else to fly but not disabled vets. Did I read his letter back to you right? I am 72, better hurry if I ever get to fly space a.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

You got two chumps/moderators at Military.com forum who are tying anchors to this issue, so don't go there. And they slam Vets looking for help half the time.

There is a new bill. Contact your Reps to get this out of commitee and signed. This is what I sent to the Armed Services Committee. And if you go to Open Congress web site, it will help you contact ALL your Congress reps at once...


"Honorable Chairman Howard P. McKeon

Armed Services Committee

2120 Rayburn House Office Bldg.
Washington, DC 20515

Reference: H.R.164 Space Availability travel for service connected Permanently Disabled Veterans



Versions of this bill have been floating around the halls of Congress for decades. I pray that you will move it out of committee and onto the floor.

Taking care of Disabled Veterans who were not medically retired from their service, yet sustained injuries severe enough to warrant apermanent and total rating is a small benefit to extend to us. Many of us pine for our days in the Military and traveling to see the wonders of our sacrifices, here and around the world.

The aircraft we would be able to fly on give priority to our Nation’s defense and we would only be occupying seats which would have been left empty. It is hard to imagine why this has not been enacted before.

Your endorsement and help in passing this legislation would certainly be another accolade you could cite as your support for America’s permanently Disabled Veterans. And it would be nearly cost-free."

Edited by Watchdog311

Change does not come from Compliance mad.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not know why they will not pass this. At least make the catergory 7 so 100% vets and their spouse could fly. Half the time, the planes are not close to being full. Some body with some power has to get to the congress to get this passed. These guys will tell you they are going to help and it never gets voted on. It has been going on for years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use